Ayalew Tefferi, Saubia Fathima, Ali Khalid A. Alsugair, Fnu Aperna, Anuya Natu, Maymona G. Abdelmagid, Clifford M. Csizmar, Mark Gurney, Terra L. Lasho, Christy M. Finke, Abhishek A. Mangaonkar, Aref Al-Kali, Animesh Pardanani, Kaaren K. Reichard, Rong He, Naseema Gangat, Mrinal M. Patnaik
{"title":"慢性粒单核细胞白血病中的 PHF6 基因突变确定了一个具有独特表型和良好预后的独特患者亚群","authors":"Ayalew Tefferi, Saubia Fathima, Ali Khalid A. Alsugair, Fnu Aperna, Anuya Natu, Maymona G. Abdelmagid, Clifford M. Csizmar, Mark Gurney, Terra L. Lasho, Christy M. Finke, Abhishek A. Mangaonkar, Aref Al-Kali, Animesh Pardanani, Kaaren K. Reichard, Rong He, Naseema Gangat, Mrinal M. Patnaik","doi":"10.1002/ajh.27492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current study was inspired by observations from exploratory analyses of an institutional cohort with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML; <i>N</i> = 398) that revealed no instances of blast transformation in the seven patients with plant homeodomain finger protein 6 (<i>PHF6</i>) mutation (<i>PHF6</i><sup>MUT</sup>). A subsequent Mayo Clinic enterprise-wide database search identified 28 more cases with <i>PHF6</i><sup>MUT</sup>. Compared with their wild-type <i>PHF6</i> counterparts (<i>PHF6</i><sup>WT</sup>; <i>N</i> = 391), <i>PHF6</i><sup>MUT</sup> cases (<i>N</i> = 35) were more likely to co-express <i>TET2</i> (89% vs. 45%; <i>p</i> < .01), <i>RUNX1</i> (29% vs. 14%; <i>p</i> = .03), <i>CBL</i> (14% vs. 2%; <i>p</i> < .01), and <i>U2AF1</i> (17% vs. 6%; <i>p</i> = .04) and less likely <i>SRSF2</i> (23% vs. 45%; <i>p</i> < .01) mutation. They were also more likely to display loss of Y chromosome (LoY; 21% vs. 2%; <i>p</i> < .01) and platelets <100 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L (83% vs. 51%; <i>p</i> < .01). Multivariable analysis identified <i>PHF6</i><sup>MUT</sup> (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15–0.50) and <i>DNMT3A</i><sup>MUT</sup> (HR 5.8, 95% CI 3.3–10.5) as the strongest molecular predictors of overall survival. The same was true for blast transformation-free survival with corresponding HR (95% CI) of 0.08 (0.01–0.6) and 9.5 (3.8–23.5). At median 20 months follow-up, blast transformation was documented in none of the 33 patients with <i>PHF6</i><sup>MUT</sup>/<i>DNMT3A</i><sup>WT</sup> but in 6 (32%) of 19 with <i>DNMT3A</i><sup>MUT</sup> and 74 (20%) of 374 with <i>PHF6</i><sup>WT</sup>/<i>DNMT3A</i><sup>WT</sup> (<i>p</i> < .01). The specific molecular signatures sustained their significant predictive performance in the context of the CMML-specific molecular prognostic model (CPSS-mol). <i>PHF6</i><sup>MUT</sup> identifies a unique subset of patients with CMML characterized by thrombocytopenia, higher prevalence of LoY, and superior prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"99 12","pages":"2321-2327"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajh.27492","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PHF6 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia identify a unique subset of patients with distinct phenotype and superior prognosis\",\"authors\":\"Ayalew Tefferi, Saubia Fathima, Ali Khalid A. Alsugair, Fnu Aperna, Anuya Natu, Maymona G. Abdelmagid, Clifford M. Csizmar, Mark Gurney, Terra L. Lasho, Christy M. Finke, Abhishek A. Mangaonkar, Aref Al-Kali, Animesh Pardanani, Kaaren K. Reichard, Rong He, Naseema Gangat, Mrinal M. Patnaik\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajh.27492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The current study was inspired by observations from exploratory analyses of an institutional cohort with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML; <i>N</i> = 398) that revealed no instances of blast transformation in the seven patients with plant homeodomain finger protein 6 (<i>PHF6</i>) mutation (<i>PHF6</i><sup>MUT</sup>). A subsequent Mayo Clinic enterprise-wide database search identified 28 more cases with <i>PHF6</i><sup>MUT</sup>. Compared with their wild-type <i>PHF6</i> counterparts (<i>PHF6</i><sup>WT</sup>; <i>N</i> = 391), <i>PHF6</i><sup>MUT</sup> cases (<i>N</i> = 35) were more likely to co-express <i>TET2</i> (89% vs. 45%; <i>p</i> < .01), <i>RUNX1</i> (29% vs. 14%; <i>p</i> = .03), <i>CBL</i> (14% vs. 2%; <i>p</i> < .01), and <i>U2AF1</i> (17% vs. 6%; <i>p</i> = .04) and less likely <i>SRSF2</i> (23% vs. 45%; <i>p</i> < .01) mutation. They were also more likely to display loss of Y chromosome (LoY; 21% vs. 2%; <i>p</i> < .01) and platelets <100 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L (83% vs. 51%; <i>p</i> < .01). Multivariable analysis identified <i>PHF6</i><sup>MUT</sup> (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15–0.50) and <i>DNMT3A</i><sup>MUT</sup> (HR 5.8, 95% CI 3.3–10.5) as the strongest molecular predictors of overall survival. The same was true for blast transformation-free survival with corresponding HR (95% CI) of 0.08 (0.01–0.6) and 9.5 (3.8–23.5). At median 20 months follow-up, blast transformation was documented in none of the 33 patients with <i>PHF6</i><sup>MUT</sup>/<i>DNMT3A</i><sup>WT</sup> but in 6 (32%) of 19 with <i>DNMT3A</i><sup>MUT</sup> and 74 (20%) of 374 with <i>PHF6</i><sup>WT</sup>/<i>DNMT3A</i><sup>WT</sup> (<i>p</i> < .01). The specific molecular signatures sustained their significant predictive performance in the context of the CMML-specific molecular prognostic model (CPSS-mol). <i>PHF6</i><sup>MUT</sup> identifies a unique subset of patients with CMML characterized by thrombocytopenia, higher prevalence of LoY, and superior prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Hematology\",\"volume\":\"99 12\",\"pages\":\"2321-2327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajh.27492\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajh.27492\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajh.27492","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
PHF6 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia identify a unique subset of patients with distinct phenotype and superior prognosis
The current study was inspired by observations from exploratory analyses of an institutional cohort with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML; N = 398) that revealed no instances of blast transformation in the seven patients with plant homeodomain finger protein 6 (PHF6) mutation (PHF6MUT). A subsequent Mayo Clinic enterprise-wide database search identified 28 more cases with PHF6MUT. Compared with their wild-type PHF6 counterparts (PHF6WT; N = 391), PHF6MUT cases (N = 35) were more likely to co-express TET2 (89% vs. 45%; p < .01), RUNX1 (29% vs. 14%; p = .03), CBL (14% vs. 2%; p < .01), and U2AF1 (17% vs. 6%; p = .04) and less likely SRSF2 (23% vs. 45%; p < .01) mutation. They were also more likely to display loss of Y chromosome (LoY; 21% vs. 2%; p < .01) and platelets <100 × 109/L (83% vs. 51%; p < .01). Multivariable analysis identified PHF6MUT (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15–0.50) and DNMT3AMUT (HR 5.8, 95% CI 3.3–10.5) as the strongest molecular predictors of overall survival. The same was true for blast transformation-free survival with corresponding HR (95% CI) of 0.08 (0.01–0.6) and 9.5 (3.8–23.5). At median 20 months follow-up, blast transformation was documented in none of the 33 patients with PHF6MUT/DNMT3AWT but in 6 (32%) of 19 with DNMT3AMUT and 74 (20%) of 374 with PHF6WT/DNMT3AWT (p < .01). The specific molecular signatures sustained their significant predictive performance in the context of the CMML-specific molecular prognostic model (CPSS-mol). PHF6MUT identifies a unique subset of patients with CMML characterized by thrombocytopenia, higher prevalence of LoY, and superior prognosis.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Hematology offers extensive coverage of experimental and clinical aspects of blood diseases in humans and animal models. The journal publishes original contributions in both non-malignant and malignant hematological diseases, encompassing clinical and basic studies in areas such as hemostasis, thrombosis, immunology, blood banking, and stem cell biology. Clinical translational reports highlighting innovative therapeutic approaches for the diagnosis and treatment of hematological diseases are actively encouraged.The American Journal of Hematology features regular original laboratory and clinical research articles, brief research reports, critical reviews, images in hematology, as well as letters and correspondence.