玉米产量和水分的定向重组与循环选择的潜在遗传增益

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Crop Science Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1002/csc2.21368
John N. Cameron, Rex Bernardo
{"title":"玉米产量和水分的定向重组与循环选择的潜在遗传增益","authors":"John N. Cameron,&nbsp;Rex Bernardo","doi":"10.1002/csc2.21368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recurrent selection is a proven method and targeted recombination is a potential method for achieving genetic gain. Our objectives were to determine the (1) equivalency in predicted gains between cycles of recurrent selection and targeted recombination in maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.), (2) correspondence between targeted-recombination positions when gains from nontargeted chromosomes are considered versus ignored, and (3) trade-offs in predicted gains for yield and moisture in targeted recombination. From genomewide marker effects for 2911 single nucleotide polymorphism loci in 270 biparental populations, we obtained predicted gains from fixed numbers of targeted recombinations and compared these gains to the genotypic-value distributions of doubled haploids obtained from different cycles of simulated recurrent selection. On average, it took three cycles of single-trait recurrent selection to obtain at least a few doubled haploid lines with the same performance achieved with nine or 10 targeted recombinations in Cycle 0. Results indicated that when targeting recombinations across the genome, gains from segregation on nontargeted chromosomes do not need to be considered. Predicted increases in yield were associated with increases in moisture. Given the logistics of pyramiding targeted recombinations and the lack of mature technologies for routine targeted recombination, recurrent selection is currently the preferred approach for accumulating favorable recombinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10849,"journal":{"name":"Crop Science","volume":"64 6","pages":"3231-3241"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/csc2.21368","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential genetic gains from targeted recombination versus recurrent selection for maize yield and moisture\",\"authors\":\"John N. Cameron,&nbsp;Rex Bernardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/csc2.21368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Recurrent selection is a proven method and targeted recombination is a potential method for achieving genetic gain. Our objectives were to determine the (1) equivalency in predicted gains between cycles of recurrent selection and targeted recombination in maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.), (2) correspondence between targeted-recombination positions when gains from nontargeted chromosomes are considered versus ignored, and (3) trade-offs in predicted gains for yield and moisture in targeted recombination. From genomewide marker effects for 2911 single nucleotide polymorphism loci in 270 biparental populations, we obtained predicted gains from fixed numbers of targeted recombinations and compared these gains to the genotypic-value distributions of doubled haploids obtained from different cycles of simulated recurrent selection. On average, it took three cycles of single-trait recurrent selection to obtain at least a few doubled haploid lines with the same performance achieved with nine or 10 targeted recombinations in Cycle 0. Results indicated that when targeting recombinations across the genome, gains from segregation on nontargeted chromosomes do not need to be considered. Predicted increases in yield were associated with increases in moisture. Given the logistics of pyramiding targeted recombinations and the lack of mature technologies for routine targeted recombination, recurrent selection is currently the preferred approach for accumulating favorable recombinations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Science\",\"volume\":\"64 6\",\"pages\":\"3231-3241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/csc2.21368\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csc2.21368\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csc2.21368","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

循环选择是一种行之有效的方法,而定向重组是实现遗传增益的一种潜在方法。我们的目标是确定:(1) 在玉米(Zea mays L.)中,循环选择和定向重组之间的预测增益是否相等;(2) 在考虑与忽略非目标染色体的增益时,定向重组位置之间的对应关系;(3) 定向重组中产量和水分预测增益的权衡。从 270 个双亲种群中 2911 个单核苷酸多态性位点的全基因组标记效应中,我们获得了固定数目的定向重组的预测收益,并将这些收益与不同周期模拟循环选择获得的加倍单倍体的基因型值分布进行了比较。平均而言,经过三个周期的单性状循环选择后,至少有几个加倍单倍体株系的表现与第 0 周期中 9 或 10 次定向重组的表现相同。结果表明,当在整个基因组中进行定向重组时,无需考虑非定向染色体上的分离收益。预测的产量增加与水分增加有关。鉴于金字塔定向重组的后勤工作以及常规定向重组技术的不成熟,循环选择是目前积累有利重组的首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Potential genetic gains from targeted recombination versus recurrent selection for maize yield and moisture

Potential genetic gains from targeted recombination versus recurrent selection for maize yield and moisture

Recurrent selection is a proven method and targeted recombination is a potential method for achieving genetic gain. Our objectives were to determine the (1) equivalency in predicted gains between cycles of recurrent selection and targeted recombination in maize (Zea mays L.), (2) correspondence between targeted-recombination positions when gains from nontargeted chromosomes are considered versus ignored, and (3) trade-offs in predicted gains for yield and moisture in targeted recombination. From genomewide marker effects for 2911 single nucleotide polymorphism loci in 270 biparental populations, we obtained predicted gains from fixed numbers of targeted recombinations and compared these gains to the genotypic-value distributions of doubled haploids obtained from different cycles of simulated recurrent selection. On average, it took three cycles of single-trait recurrent selection to obtain at least a few doubled haploid lines with the same performance achieved with nine or 10 targeted recombinations in Cycle 0. Results indicated that when targeting recombinations across the genome, gains from segregation on nontargeted chromosomes do not need to be considered. Predicted increases in yield were associated with increases in moisture. Given the logistics of pyramiding targeted recombinations and the lack of mature technologies for routine targeted recombination, recurrent selection is currently the preferred approach for accumulating favorable recombinations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crop Science
Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in Crop Science are of interest to researchers, policy makers, educators, and practitioners. The scope of articles in Crop Science includes crop breeding and genetics; crop physiology and metabolism; crop ecology, production, and management; seed physiology, production, and technology; turfgrass science; forage and grazing land ecology and management; genomics, molecular genetics, and biotechnology; germplasm collections and their use; and biomedical, health beneficial, and nutritionally enhanced plants. Crop Science publishes thematic collections of articles across its scope and includes topical Review and Interpretation, and Perspectives articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信