{"title":"使用非卤化溶剂从巨栉藻中提取聚(3-羟基丁酸酯):性能比较分析","authors":"Fernanda Borges, Xilena Rodriguez Oyola, Nilo Sérgio Medeiros Cardozo, Débora Jung Luvizetto Faccin","doi":"10.1016/j.bej.2024.109502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Solvent extraction using chloroform is the most common industrial process for poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (P(3HB)) recovery from dried biomass, and still a major barrier to expanding the commercial application of this biodegradable biopolymer. Consequently, there is great interest in alternative non-halogenated solvents for this process and some relevant related results are available in the literature for P(3HB) recovery from Gram-negative bacteria. This work evaluated the potential of a set of non-halogenated solvents for the extraction of P(3HB) from <em>Priestia megaterium</em>, a Gram-positive bacterium of great potential for P(3HB) production. Ethyl acetate (EtAc), methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), dimethyl carbonate (DMC), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethylacetamide (NNDA), 2-heptanone (2-Hp), propylene carbonate (PC), and isoamyl propionate (IAP) were tested. Preliminary solubilization tests using commercial P(3HB) showed that EtAc, MEK, DMC and IAP had lower P(3HB) solubilization capacity (below 0.08 g/L for EtAc, MEK, and DMC; 1.3–2.5 g/L for IAP) than DMSO (65–70 g/L) and PC, 2-Hp and NNDA (>100 g/L). Then, only DMSO, PC, 2-Hp, and NNDA were evaluated in recovery tests with intracellular P(3HB). DMSO was not selective for P(3HB), causing digestion of cell wall components. PC, 2-Hp, and NNDA outperformed chloroform, but NNDA stood out for its remarkably higher recovery (98.5 %, 30 min, 140 ºC).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8766,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Engineering Journal","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 109502"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extraction of poly(3-hydroxybutirate) from Priestia megaterium using non-halogenated solvents: A comparative performance analysis\",\"authors\":\"Fernanda Borges, Xilena Rodriguez Oyola, Nilo Sérgio Medeiros Cardozo, Débora Jung Luvizetto Faccin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bej.2024.109502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Solvent extraction using chloroform is the most common industrial process for poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (P(3HB)) recovery from dried biomass, and still a major barrier to expanding the commercial application of this biodegradable biopolymer. Consequently, there is great interest in alternative non-halogenated solvents for this process and some relevant related results are available in the literature for P(3HB) recovery from Gram-negative bacteria. This work evaluated the potential of a set of non-halogenated solvents for the extraction of P(3HB) from <em>Priestia megaterium</em>, a Gram-positive bacterium of great potential for P(3HB) production. Ethyl acetate (EtAc), methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), dimethyl carbonate (DMC), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethylacetamide (NNDA), 2-heptanone (2-Hp), propylene carbonate (PC), and isoamyl propionate (IAP) were tested. Preliminary solubilization tests using commercial P(3HB) showed that EtAc, MEK, DMC and IAP had lower P(3HB) solubilization capacity (below 0.08 g/L for EtAc, MEK, and DMC; 1.3–2.5 g/L for IAP) than DMSO (65–70 g/L) and PC, 2-Hp and NNDA (>100 g/L). Then, only DMSO, PC, 2-Hp, and NNDA were evaluated in recovery tests with intracellular P(3HB). DMSO was not selective for P(3HB), causing digestion of cell wall components. PC, 2-Hp, and NNDA outperformed chloroform, but NNDA stood out for its remarkably higher recovery (98.5 %, 30 min, 140 ºC).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biochemical Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"212 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biochemical Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369703X24002894\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369703X24002894","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Extraction of poly(3-hydroxybutirate) from Priestia megaterium using non-halogenated solvents: A comparative performance analysis
Solvent extraction using chloroform is the most common industrial process for poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (P(3HB)) recovery from dried biomass, and still a major barrier to expanding the commercial application of this biodegradable biopolymer. Consequently, there is great interest in alternative non-halogenated solvents for this process and some relevant related results are available in the literature for P(3HB) recovery from Gram-negative bacteria. This work evaluated the potential of a set of non-halogenated solvents for the extraction of P(3HB) from Priestia megaterium, a Gram-positive bacterium of great potential for P(3HB) production. Ethyl acetate (EtAc), methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), dimethyl carbonate (DMC), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethylacetamide (NNDA), 2-heptanone (2-Hp), propylene carbonate (PC), and isoamyl propionate (IAP) were tested. Preliminary solubilization tests using commercial P(3HB) showed that EtAc, MEK, DMC and IAP had lower P(3HB) solubilization capacity (below 0.08 g/L for EtAc, MEK, and DMC; 1.3–2.5 g/L for IAP) than DMSO (65–70 g/L) and PC, 2-Hp and NNDA (>100 g/L). Then, only DMSO, PC, 2-Hp, and NNDA were evaluated in recovery tests with intracellular P(3HB). DMSO was not selective for P(3HB), causing digestion of cell wall components. PC, 2-Hp, and NNDA outperformed chloroform, but NNDA stood out for its remarkably higher recovery (98.5 %, 30 min, 140 ºC).
期刊介绍:
The Biochemical Engineering Journal aims to promote progress in the crucial chemical engineering aspects of the development of biological processes associated with everything from raw materials preparation to product recovery relevant to industries as diverse as medical/healthcare, industrial biotechnology, and environmental biotechnology.
The Journal welcomes full length original research papers, short communications, and review papers* in the following research fields:
Biocatalysis (enzyme or microbial) and biotransformations, including immobilized biocatalyst preparation and kinetics
Biosensors and Biodevices including biofabrication and novel fuel cell development
Bioseparations including scale-up and protein refolding/renaturation
Environmental Bioengineering including bioconversion, bioremediation, and microbial fuel cells
Bioreactor Systems including characterization, optimization and scale-up
Bioresources and Biorefinery Engineering including biomass conversion, biofuels, bioenergy, and optimization
Industrial Biotechnology including specialty chemicals, platform chemicals and neutraceuticals
Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering including bioartificial organs, cell encapsulation, and controlled release
Cell Culture Engineering (plant, animal or insect cells) including viral vectors, monoclonal antibodies, recombinant proteins, vaccines, and secondary metabolites
Cell Therapies and Stem Cells including pluripotent, mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cells; immunotherapies; tissue-specific differentiation; and cryopreservation
Metabolic Engineering, Systems and Synthetic Biology including OMICS, bioinformatics, in silico biology, and metabolic flux analysis
Protein Engineering including enzyme engineering and directed evolution.