飞机噪音、睡眠和睡眠-觉醒周期之间的关系:四个主要机场附近英国生物库队列的行动测量数据。

IF 10.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Xiangpu Gong,Katie Eminson,Glory O Atilola,Calvin Jephcote,Kathryn Adams,Gabriella Captur,Andrew P Hall,Marta Blangiardo,John Gulliver,Alex V Rowlands,Anna L Hansell
{"title":"飞机噪音、睡眠和睡眠-觉醒周期之间的关系:四个主要机场附近英国生物库队列的行动测量数据。","authors":"Xiangpu Gong,Katie Eminson,Glory O Atilola,Calvin Jephcote,Kathryn Adams,Gabriella Captur,Andrew P Hall,Marta Blangiardo,John Gulliver,Alex V Rowlands,Anna L Hansell","doi":"10.1289/ehp14156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nNighttime aircraft noise may affect people's sleep, yet large-scale evidence using objective and subjective measures remains limited.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nOur aim was to investigate associations between nighttime aircraft noise exposure and objectively measured sleep disturbance using a large UK cohort.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe used data from 105,770 UK Biobank cohort participants exposed and unexposed to aircraft noise who lived in 44 local authority districts near 4 international airports in England. We used a generalized linear regression model to examine cross-sectional associations between aircraft noise Lnight (23:00 hours-07:00 hours) and 7-d actimetric measures collected 2013-2015 (n=22,102). We also used Logit and generalized estimating equations models to examine associations between Lnight and self-reported sleep measures at enrollment (2006-2010) and follow-up (2012-2013). This approach allowed us to compare and contrast the results and support potential future meta-analyses on noise-related sleep disturbance.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nCross-sectional analyses of actimetric data suggested sleep disturbance associated with Lnight, showing higher level of movements during the least active continuous 8-h time period [β: 0.12 milligravitational units; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.013, 0.23]. We also saw disrupted sleep-wake cycles as indicated by index scores of lower relative amplitude (β: -0.006; 95% CI: -0.007, -0.005), poorer interdaily stability (β: -0.010; 95% CI: -0.014, -0.006), and greater intradaily variability (β: 0.021; 95% CI: 0.019, 0.023), comparing Lnight ≥55 dB with <45 dB. Repeated cross-sectional analyses found a 52% higher odds of more frequent daytime dozing [odds ratio (OR) =1.52; 95% CI: 1.32, 1.75] for Lnight ≥55 dB in comparison with <45 dB, whereas the likelihood for more frequent sleeplessness was more uncertain (OR=1.13; 95% CI: 0.92, 1.39). Higher effect sizes were seen in preidentified vulnerable groups, including individuals >65y of age and those with diabetes or dementia.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nIndividuals exposed to higher levels of aircraft noise experienced objectively higher levels of sleep disturbance and changes in sleep-wake cycle. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14156.","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":"3 1","pages":"97006"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between Aircraft Noise, Sleep, and Sleep-Wake Cycle: Actimetric Data from the UK Biobank Cohort near Four Major Airports.\",\"authors\":\"Xiangpu Gong,Katie Eminson,Glory O Atilola,Calvin Jephcote,Kathryn Adams,Gabriella Captur,Andrew P Hall,Marta Blangiardo,John Gulliver,Alex V Rowlands,Anna L Hansell\",\"doi\":\"10.1289/ehp14156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nNighttime aircraft noise may affect people's sleep, yet large-scale evidence using objective and subjective measures remains limited.\\r\\n\\r\\nOBJECTIVE\\r\\nOur aim was to investigate associations between nighttime aircraft noise exposure and objectively measured sleep disturbance using a large UK cohort.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe used data from 105,770 UK Biobank cohort participants exposed and unexposed to aircraft noise who lived in 44 local authority districts near 4 international airports in England. We used a generalized linear regression model to examine cross-sectional associations between aircraft noise Lnight (23:00 hours-07:00 hours) and 7-d actimetric measures collected 2013-2015 (n=22,102). We also used Logit and generalized estimating equations models to examine associations between Lnight and self-reported sleep measures at enrollment (2006-2010) and follow-up (2012-2013). This approach allowed us to compare and contrast the results and support potential future meta-analyses on noise-related sleep disturbance.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nCross-sectional analyses of actimetric data suggested sleep disturbance associated with Lnight, showing higher level of movements during the least active continuous 8-h time period [β: 0.12 milligravitational units; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.013, 0.23]. We also saw disrupted sleep-wake cycles as indicated by index scores of lower relative amplitude (β: -0.006; 95% CI: -0.007, -0.005), poorer interdaily stability (β: -0.010; 95% CI: -0.014, -0.006), and greater intradaily variability (β: 0.021; 95% CI: 0.019, 0.023), comparing Lnight ≥55 dB with <45 dB. Repeated cross-sectional analyses found a 52% higher odds of more frequent daytime dozing [odds ratio (OR) =1.52; 95% CI: 1.32, 1.75] for Lnight ≥55 dB in comparison with <45 dB, whereas the likelihood for more frequent sleeplessness was more uncertain (OR=1.13; 95% CI: 0.92, 1.39). Higher effect sizes were seen in preidentified vulnerable groups, including individuals >65y of age and those with diabetes or dementia.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nIndividuals exposed to higher levels of aircraft noise experienced objectively higher levels of sleep disturbance and changes in sleep-wake cycle. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14156.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Health Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"97006\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Health Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp14156\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp14156","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:夜间飞机噪声可能会影响人们的睡眠,但使用客观和主观测量方法得出的大规模证据仍然有限。方法:我们使用了 105,770 名暴露于和未暴露于飞机噪声的英国生物库队列参与者的数据,这些参与者居住在英国 4 个国际机场附近的 44 个地方当局辖区。我们使用广义线性回归模型研究了飞机噪声夜间(23:00-07:00)与 2013-2015 年收集的 7 天行为测量数据(n=22,102)之间的横截面关联。我们还使用了 Logit 和广义估计方程模型来研究入组(2006-2010 年)和随访(2012-2013 年)时飞机噪声 Lnight 与自我报告的睡眠测量值之间的关系。结果行为测量数据的横断面分析表明,睡眠障碍与 "一夜 "有关,显示在最不活跃的连续 8 小时时间段内运动水平较高 [β:0.12 毫重力单位;95% 置信区间 (CI):0.013, 0.23]。我们还发现,相对振幅较低(β:-0.006;95% CI:-0.007,-0.005)、日间稳定性较差(β:-0.010;95% CI:-0.014,-0.006)和日内变异性较大(β:0.021;95% CI:0.019,0.023)的指数得分表明睡眠-觉醒周期被打乱。023),与 Lnight ≥55 dB、65 岁以及患有糖尿病或痴呆症的人进行比较。结论暴露于较高水平飞机噪声的个体客观上经历了较高水平的睡眠障碍和睡眠-觉醒周期变化。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14156。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations between Aircraft Noise, Sleep, and Sleep-Wake Cycle: Actimetric Data from the UK Biobank Cohort near Four Major Airports.
BACKGROUND Nighttime aircraft noise may affect people's sleep, yet large-scale evidence using objective and subjective measures remains limited. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to investigate associations between nighttime aircraft noise exposure and objectively measured sleep disturbance using a large UK cohort. METHODS We used data from 105,770 UK Biobank cohort participants exposed and unexposed to aircraft noise who lived in 44 local authority districts near 4 international airports in England. We used a generalized linear regression model to examine cross-sectional associations between aircraft noise Lnight (23:00 hours-07:00 hours) and 7-d actimetric measures collected 2013-2015 (n=22,102). We also used Logit and generalized estimating equations models to examine associations between Lnight and self-reported sleep measures at enrollment (2006-2010) and follow-up (2012-2013). This approach allowed us to compare and contrast the results and support potential future meta-analyses on noise-related sleep disturbance. RESULTS Cross-sectional analyses of actimetric data suggested sleep disturbance associated with Lnight, showing higher level of movements during the least active continuous 8-h time period [β: 0.12 milligravitational units; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.013, 0.23]. We also saw disrupted sleep-wake cycles as indicated by index scores of lower relative amplitude (β: -0.006; 95% CI: -0.007, -0.005), poorer interdaily stability (β: -0.010; 95% CI: -0.014, -0.006), and greater intradaily variability (β: 0.021; 95% CI: 0.019, 0.023), comparing Lnight ≥55 dB with <45 dB. Repeated cross-sectional analyses found a 52% higher odds of more frequent daytime dozing [odds ratio (OR) =1.52; 95% CI: 1.32, 1.75] for Lnight ≥55 dB in comparison with <45 dB, whereas the likelihood for more frequent sleeplessness was more uncertain (OR=1.13; 95% CI: 0.92, 1.39). Higher effect sizes were seen in preidentified vulnerable groups, including individuals >65y of age and those with diabetes or dementia. CONCLUSION Individuals exposed to higher levels of aircraft noise experienced objectively higher levels of sleep disturbance and changes in sleep-wake cycle. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14156.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Health Perspectives
Environmental Health Perspectives 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
388
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信