利用全球可变分辨率模型建立跨尺度的强降水模型:中国灾难性事件案例研究

IF 3.8 2区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Mingyue Xu, Chun Zhao, Gudongze Li, Jun Gu, Jiawang Feng, Ziyu Zhang, Jianping Guo
{"title":"利用全球可变分辨率模型建立跨尺度的强降水模型:中国灾难性事件案例研究","authors":"Mingyue Xu,&nbsp;Chun Zhao,&nbsp;Gudongze Li,&nbsp;Jun Gu,&nbsp;Jiawang Feng,&nbsp;Ziyu Zhang,&nbsp;Jianping Guo","doi":"10.1029/2024JD041180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>An unprecedented heavy rainfall event in China (“21.7” extreme rainfall event) was simulated using the global variable-resolution model (MPAS-Atmosphere) across the scales (4, 8, 16 and 50 km). Although almost all experiments at different resolutions reproduce the spatiotemporal characteristics of precipitation, the simulated precipitation intensity from high to low is 16, 8, 50, and 4 km, with the 16 km simulation being closest to the observations. Precipitation magnitude is prominently influenced by the difference in simulated large-scale circulation across a range of grid spacings. Further analysis revealed that the differences in latent heating across scales affect the geopotential height and wind field by altering temperature. The latent heating in 4 km simulation is the minimum while the 16 km simulation is maximum. More latent heating release leads to the low-level pressure depression, amplifies the water vapor flux convergence, produces stronger upward motion and more clouds, and ultimately results in stronger precipitation. The sensitivity experiments for turning off latent heating tendencies during the event showed that the latent heat release has positive feedback on the “21.7” heavy rainfall event. This study highlights the importance of scale-awareness of latent heat at different resolutions and suggests that the difference in simulated latent heat release during the event is the main reason for simulated different atmospheric circulation and precipitation across scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling Across Scales of Heavy Precipitation With a Global Variable-Resolution Model: A Case Study of a Catastrophic Event in China\",\"authors\":\"Mingyue Xu,&nbsp;Chun Zhao,&nbsp;Gudongze Li,&nbsp;Jun Gu,&nbsp;Jiawang Feng,&nbsp;Ziyu Zhang,&nbsp;Jianping Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JD041180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>An unprecedented heavy rainfall event in China (“21.7” extreme rainfall event) was simulated using the global variable-resolution model (MPAS-Atmosphere) across the scales (4, 8, 16 and 50 km). Although almost all experiments at different resolutions reproduce the spatiotemporal characteristics of precipitation, the simulated precipitation intensity from high to low is 16, 8, 50, and 4 km, with the 16 km simulation being closest to the observations. Precipitation magnitude is prominently influenced by the difference in simulated large-scale circulation across a range of grid spacings. Further analysis revealed that the differences in latent heating across scales affect the geopotential height and wind field by altering temperature. The latent heating in 4 km simulation is the minimum while the 16 km simulation is maximum. More latent heating release leads to the low-level pressure depression, amplifies the water vapor flux convergence, produces stronger upward motion and more clouds, and ultimately results in stronger precipitation. The sensitivity experiments for turning off latent heating tendencies during the event showed that the latent heat release has positive feedback on the “21.7” heavy rainfall event. This study highlights the importance of scale-awareness of latent heat at different resolutions and suggests that the difference in simulated latent heat release during the event is the main reason for simulated different atmospheric circulation and precipitation across scales.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD041180\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD041180","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用全球变分辨率模式(MPAS-Atmosphere)对中国前所未有的强降雨事件("21.7 "极端降雨事件)进行了跨尺度(4、8、16 和 50 千米)模拟。尽管几乎所有不同分辨率的实验都再现了降水的时空特征,但模拟的降水强度从高到低分别为 16、8、50 和 4 千米,其中 16 千米的模拟结果与观测结果最为接近。降水强度受不同网格间距的模拟大尺度环流差异的影响非常显著。进一步分析表明,不同尺度的潜热差异会通过改变温度来影响位势高度和风场。4 千米模拟的潜热最小,而 16 千米模拟的潜热最大。更多的潜热释放会导致低层气压降低,放大水汽通量辐合,产生更强的上升运动和更多的云,最终导致更强的降水。在事件期间关闭潜热倾向的灵敏度实验表明,潜热释放对 "21.7 "强降雨事件具有正反馈作用。这项研究强调了在不同分辨率下对潜热进行尺度感知的重要性,并表明事件期间模拟潜热释放的差异是模拟不同尺度大气环流和降水的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modeling Across Scales of Heavy Precipitation With a Global Variable-Resolution Model: A Case Study of a Catastrophic Event in China

An unprecedented heavy rainfall event in China (“21.7” extreme rainfall event) was simulated using the global variable-resolution model (MPAS-Atmosphere) across the scales (4, 8, 16 and 50 km). Although almost all experiments at different resolutions reproduce the spatiotemporal characteristics of precipitation, the simulated precipitation intensity from high to low is 16, 8, 50, and 4 km, with the 16 km simulation being closest to the observations. Precipitation magnitude is prominently influenced by the difference in simulated large-scale circulation across a range of grid spacings. Further analysis revealed that the differences in latent heating across scales affect the geopotential height and wind field by altering temperature. The latent heating in 4 km simulation is the minimum while the 16 km simulation is maximum. More latent heating release leads to the low-level pressure depression, amplifies the water vapor flux convergence, produces stronger upward motion and more clouds, and ultimately results in stronger precipitation. The sensitivity experiments for turning off latent heating tendencies during the event showed that the latent heat release has positive feedback on the “21.7” heavy rainfall event. This study highlights the importance of scale-awareness of latent heat at different resolutions and suggests that the difference in simulated latent heat release during the event is the main reason for simulated different atmospheric circulation and precipitation across scales.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
684
期刊介绍: JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信