同时和有序组合各种技术,从麦芽根茎中可持续地广泛提取蛋白质和多酚类物质

IF 5.2 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Ester Hernández-Corroto , María Luisa Marina , María Concepción García
{"title":"同时和有序组合各种技术,从麦芽根茎中可持续地广泛提取蛋白质和多酚类物质","authors":"Ester Hernández-Corroto ,&nbsp;María Luisa Marina ,&nbsp;María Concepción García","doi":"10.1016/j.sampre.2024.100131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The emergence of tecnhiques such as microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE), ultrasounds-assisted extraction (UAE), and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) has brough many benefits but their single use does not guarantee the hollistic extraction of target compounds from complex samples. Taking into account their different principles and that one technique may favour the extraction of certain compounds over others, this work proposes the combination of these techniques for improving extraction yields in the recovery of proteins, as example of large molecule, and phenolic compounds, as example of small molecule, from a recalcitrant sample. No single extraction technique recovered all proteins or phenolic compounds, even after a proper optimization. Among them, PLE was the most advantageous, enabling the extraction of 67 % proteins and 1.20 g gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/100 g sample. Analysis of samples by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and separation of extracts by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) and sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) revealed that PLE showed the most distinct efficiency among EAE, MAE, and UAE, whereas the latter three exhibited more similar results. Based in these results, ten different combinations (sequential and/or simultaneous) of these techniques were proposed. PLE in combination with another technique showed a great potential for the extraction of both large and small molecules. Particularly, the combination of EAE and PLE recovered 100 % of proteins and more than three times the phenolic compounds extracted by other methods reported in the literature, even revealing significant synergistic effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100052,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Sample Preparation","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100131"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simultaneous and sequential combination of techniques for the sustainable and extensive extraction of proteins and polyphenols from malt rootlets\",\"authors\":\"Ester Hernández-Corroto ,&nbsp;María Luisa Marina ,&nbsp;María Concepción García\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sampre.2024.100131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The emergence of tecnhiques such as microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE), ultrasounds-assisted extraction (UAE), and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) has brough many benefits but their single use does not guarantee the hollistic extraction of target compounds from complex samples. Taking into account their different principles and that one technique may favour the extraction of certain compounds over others, this work proposes the combination of these techniques for improving extraction yields in the recovery of proteins, as example of large molecule, and phenolic compounds, as example of small molecule, from a recalcitrant sample. No single extraction technique recovered all proteins or phenolic compounds, even after a proper optimization. Among them, PLE was the most advantageous, enabling the extraction of 67 % proteins and 1.20 g gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/100 g sample. Analysis of samples by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and separation of extracts by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) and sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) revealed that PLE showed the most distinct efficiency among EAE, MAE, and UAE, whereas the latter three exhibited more similar results. Based in these results, ten different combinations (sequential and/or simultaneous) of these techniques were proposed. PLE in combination with another technique showed a great potential for the extraction of both large and small molecules. Particularly, the combination of EAE and PLE recovered 100 % of proteins and more than three times the phenolic compounds extracted by other methods reported in the literature, even revealing significant synergistic effects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Sample Preparation\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Sample Preparation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582024000305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Sample Preparation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582024000305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微波辅助萃取(MAE)、酶辅助萃取(EAE)、超声辅助萃取(UAE)和加压液体萃取(PLE)等技术的出现带来了许多好处,但这些技术的单一使用并不能保证从复杂样品中准确萃取目标化合物。考虑到这几种萃取技术的不同原理,以及一种技术可能比其他技术更有利于萃取某些化合物,本研究建议将这几种萃取技术结合使用,以提高萃取率,从而从难萃取的样品中回收蛋白质(如大分子)和酚类化合物(如小分子)。即使经过适当的优化,也没有一种萃取技术能回收所有蛋白质或酚类化合物。其中,PLE 最具优势,可提取 67% 的蛋白质和 1.20 克没食子酸当量(GAE)/100 克样品。通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对样品进行分析,并通过反相高效液相色谱(RP-HPLC)和十二烷基硫酸钠聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)对提取物进行分离,结果表明,在 EAE、MAE 和 UAE 中,PLE 的效率最高,而后三者的结果较为相似。根据这些结果,提出了这些技术的十种不同组合(连续和/或同时)。PLE 与另一种技术的结合显示了提取大分子和小分子的巨大潜力。特别是,EAE 和 PLE 的组合能 100% 地回收蛋白质,其酚类化合物的回收率是文献报道的其他方法的三倍以上,甚至显示出显著的协同效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Simultaneous and sequential combination of techniques for the sustainable and extensive extraction of proteins and polyphenols from malt rootlets

Simultaneous and sequential combination of techniques for the sustainable and extensive extraction of proteins and polyphenols from malt rootlets
The emergence of tecnhiques such as microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE), ultrasounds-assisted extraction (UAE), and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) has brough many benefits but their single use does not guarantee the hollistic extraction of target compounds from complex samples. Taking into account their different principles and that one technique may favour the extraction of certain compounds over others, this work proposes the combination of these techniques for improving extraction yields in the recovery of proteins, as example of large molecule, and phenolic compounds, as example of small molecule, from a recalcitrant sample. No single extraction technique recovered all proteins or phenolic compounds, even after a proper optimization. Among them, PLE was the most advantageous, enabling the extraction of 67 % proteins and 1.20 g gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/100 g sample. Analysis of samples by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and separation of extracts by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) and sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) revealed that PLE showed the most distinct efficiency among EAE, MAE, and UAE, whereas the latter three exhibited more similar results. Based in these results, ten different combinations (sequential and/or simultaneous) of these techniques were proposed. PLE in combination with another technique showed a great potential for the extraction of both large and small molecules. Particularly, the combination of EAE and PLE recovered 100 % of proteins and more than three times the phenolic compounds extracted by other methods reported in the literature, even revealing significant synergistic effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信