Nuria Gomez-Casanovas, Elena Blanc-Betes, Carl J. Bernacchi, Elizabeth H. Boughton, Wendy Yang, Caitlin Moore, Taylor L. Pederson, Amartya Saha, Evan H. DeLucia
{"title":"美国东南部放牧牧场改种甘蔗后甘蔗种植对碳循环的影响","authors":"Nuria Gomez-Casanovas, Elena Blanc-Betes, Carl J. Bernacchi, Elizabeth H. Boughton, Wendy Yang, Caitlin Moore, Taylor L. Pederson, Amartya Saha, Evan H. DeLucia","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The expansion of sugarcane, a tropical high-yielding feedstock, will likely reshape the Southeastern United States (SE US) bioenergy landscape. However, the sustainability of sugarcane, particularly as it displaces grazed pastures, is highly uncertain. Here, we investigated how pasture conversion to sugarcane in subtropical Florida impacts net ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> exchange (NEE) and net ecosystem carbon (C) balance (NECB). Measurements were made over three full growth cycles (> 3 years) in sugarcane—plant cane, PC; first ratoon cane, FRC; second ratoon cane, SRC—and in improved (IM) and semi-native (SN) pastures, which make up ca. 37% of agricultural land in the region. Immediately following conversion, PC was a stronger net source of CO<sub>2</sub> than pastures, indicating the importance of CO<sub>2</sub> losses related to land disturbance. Sugarcane, however, shifted to a strong net sink of CO<sub>2</sub> after first regrowth, and overall sugarcane was a stronger net CO<sub>2</sub> sink than pastures. Both stand age and low water availability during cane emergence and tillering substantially decreased its potential gross CO<sub>2</sub> uptake. Accounting for all C gains and removals (i.e., NECB), greater frequency of burn events and repeated harvest increased removals and overall made sugarcane a stronger C source relative to pastures despite substantial C inputs from the previous land use and a stronger CO<sub>2</sub> sink strength. Time since conversion substantially reduced C losses from sugarcane, and the NECB of SRC was similar to that of IM pasture but lower than that of SN pasture, indicating a rapid shift in the NECB of cane. We conclude that the C-balance implications following conversion will depend on the proportion of IM versus SN pastures converted to sugarcane. Furthermore, our findings suggest that no-burn harvest management strategies will be critical to the development of a sustainable bioenergy landscape in SE US.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"16 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Sugarcane Cultivation on C Cycling in Southeastern United States Following Conversion From Grazed Pastures\",\"authors\":\"Nuria Gomez-Casanovas, Elena Blanc-Betes, Carl J. Bernacchi, Elizabeth H. Boughton, Wendy Yang, Caitlin Moore, Taylor L. Pederson, Amartya Saha, Evan H. DeLucia\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.70003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The expansion of sugarcane, a tropical high-yielding feedstock, will likely reshape the Southeastern United States (SE US) bioenergy landscape. However, the sustainability of sugarcane, particularly as it displaces grazed pastures, is highly uncertain. Here, we investigated how pasture conversion to sugarcane in subtropical Florida impacts net ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> exchange (NEE) and net ecosystem carbon (C) balance (NECB). Measurements were made over three full growth cycles (> 3 years) in sugarcane—plant cane, PC; first ratoon cane, FRC; second ratoon cane, SRC—and in improved (IM) and semi-native (SN) pastures, which make up ca. 37% of agricultural land in the region. Immediately following conversion, PC was a stronger net source of CO<sub>2</sub> than pastures, indicating the importance of CO<sub>2</sub> losses related to land disturbance. Sugarcane, however, shifted to a strong net sink of CO<sub>2</sub> after first regrowth, and overall sugarcane was a stronger net CO<sub>2</sub> sink than pastures. Both stand age and low water availability during cane emergence and tillering substantially decreased its potential gross CO<sub>2</sub> uptake. Accounting for all C gains and removals (i.e., NECB), greater frequency of burn events and repeated harvest increased removals and overall made sugarcane a stronger C source relative to pastures despite substantial C inputs from the previous land use and a stronger CO<sub>2</sub> sink strength. Time since conversion substantially reduced C losses from sugarcane, and the NECB of SRC was similar to that of IM pasture but lower than that of SN pasture, indicating a rapid shift in the NECB of cane. We conclude that the C-balance implications following conversion will depend on the proportion of IM versus SN pastures converted to sugarcane. Furthermore, our findings suggest that no-burn harvest management strategies will be critical to the development of a sustainable bioenergy landscape in SE US.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
甘蔗是一种热带高产原料,它的发展可能会重塑美国东南部的生物能源格局。然而,甘蔗的可持续发展,尤其是当它取代放牧的牧场时,还存在很大的不确定性。在此,我们研究了佛罗里达州亚热带地区的牧草转化为甘蔗如何影响生态系统二氧化碳净交换量(NEE)和生态系统碳(C)净平衡(NECB)。在甘蔗的三个完整生长周期(> 3年)内进行了测量--种植甘蔗,PC;第一季甘蔗,FRC;第二季甘蔗,SRC;以及改良(IM)和半原生(SN)牧场,这些牧场约占该地区农业用地的37%。这些牧场约占该地区农业用地的 37%。转化后,PC 是比牧场更强的二氧化碳净来源,这表明与土地扰动有关的二氧化碳损失的重要性。然而,甘蔗在第一次重新生长后转为一个强大的二氧化碳净吸收汇,总体而言,甘蔗是比牧草更强大的二氧化碳净吸收汇。在甘蔗萌发和分蘖期间,植株年龄和低水分供应量都大大降低了其潜在的二氧化碳总吸收量。考虑到所有的碳增量和碳清除量(即 NECB),更频繁的焚烧事件和重复收割增加了清除量,总体而言,尽管甘蔗从以前的土地利用中获得了大量的碳输入,而且二氧化碳汇强度更大,但甘蔗相对于牧草而言是更强的碳源。转换后的时间大大减少了甘蔗的碳损失,SRC 的 NECB 与 IM 牧场相似,但低于 SN 牧场,这表明甘蔗的 NECB 发生了快速变化。我们的结论是,转化后的碳平衡影响将取决于转化为甘蔗的IM牧场和SN牧场的比例。此外,我们的研究结果表明,免焚烧收割管理策略对美国东南部可持续生物能源景观的发展至关重要。
Impact of Sugarcane Cultivation on C Cycling in Southeastern United States Following Conversion From Grazed Pastures
The expansion of sugarcane, a tropical high-yielding feedstock, will likely reshape the Southeastern United States (SE US) bioenergy landscape. However, the sustainability of sugarcane, particularly as it displaces grazed pastures, is highly uncertain. Here, we investigated how pasture conversion to sugarcane in subtropical Florida impacts net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE) and net ecosystem carbon (C) balance (NECB). Measurements were made over three full growth cycles (> 3 years) in sugarcane—plant cane, PC; first ratoon cane, FRC; second ratoon cane, SRC—and in improved (IM) and semi-native (SN) pastures, which make up ca. 37% of agricultural land in the region. Immediately following conversion, PC was a stronger net source of CO2 than pastures, indicating the importance of CO2 losses related to land disturbance. Sugarcane, however, shifted to a strong net sink of CO2 after first regrowth, and overall sugarcane was a stronger net CO2 sink than pastures. Both stand age and low water availability during cane emergence and tillering substantially decreased its potential gross CO2 uptake. Accounting for all C gains and removals (i.e., NECB), greater frequency of burn events and repeated harvest increased removals and overall made sugarcane a stronger C source relative to pastures despite substantial C inputs from the previous land use and a stronger CO2 sink strength. Time since conversion substantially reduced C losses from sugarcane, and the NECB of SRC was similar to that of IM pasture but lower than that of SN pasture, indicating a rapid shift in the NECB of cane. We conclude that the C-balance implications following conversion will depend on the proportion of IM versus SN pastures converted to sugarcane. Furthermore, our findings suggest that no-burn harvest management strategies will be critical to the development of a sustainable bioenergy landscape in SE US.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.