比较 COVID-19 疫苗试验中用于检测抗体反应的检测方法:英国多中心随机对照试验的结果:确定与季节性流感疫苗(ComFluCOV)同时接种的 COVID-19 疫苗的免疫原性反应

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
{"title":"比较 COVID-19 疫苗试验中用于检测抗体反应的检测方法:英国多中心随机对照试验的结果:确定与季节性流感疫苗(ComFluCOV)同时接种的 COVID-19 疫苗的免疫原性反应","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The ComFluCOV trial tested the safety and immunogenicity of COVID-19 and influenza vaccines co-administration. Binding and functional SARS-CoV2 anti-spike responses were measured using assays developed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The three assays used to measure the immunogenicity outcomes are reported here and their performance compared to inform future vaccine development.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adults aged over 18 were vaccinated with a COVID-19 and either an influenza vaccine or saline placebo. Serum sampled one month after vaccination was used to measure SARS-CoV2 anti-spike antibody concentrations using a commercial in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), a commercial fast throughput electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) and a viral neutralisation assay (VNA). Geometric mean ratios were used to compare the response to COVID-19 with or without influenza vaccine with a threshold of 0.67 considered non-inferior. The relationship between the different assays was examined using Kendall rank correlations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The geometric mean ratios exceeded 0.67 using all assays for all COVID-19 and influenza vaccine combinations tested. Moderate rank correlations were found between the three assays.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>All three assays confirmed that vaccine co-administration did not significantly impact on immunogenicity of any of the vaccines tested.</div><div><strong>Trial registration:</strong> ISRCTN14391248, registered on 17/03/2021.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X2401051X/pdfft?md5=daf81b769761a25552b00d3b067afe66&pid=1-s2.0-S0264410X2401051X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of assays used to detect antibody response in COVID-19 vaccine trials: Results from of a UK multi-Centre randomised controlled trial to determine the immunogenicity responses of COVID-19 vaccines administered concomitantly with seasonal influenza vaccines (ComFluCOV)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The ComFluCOV trial tested the safety and immunogenicity of COVID-19 and influenza vaccines co-administration. Binding and functional SARS-CoV2 anti-spike responses were measured using assays developed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The three assays used to measure the immunogenicity outcomes are reported here and their performance compared to inform future vaccine development.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adults aged over 18 were vaccinated with a COVID-19 and either an influenza vaccine or saline placebo. Serum sampled one month after vaccination was used to measure SARS-CoV2 anti-spike antibody concentrations using a commercial in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), a commercial fast throughput electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) and a viral neutralisation assay (VNA). Geometric mean ratios were used to compare the response to COVID-19 with or without influenza vaccine with a threshold of 0.67 considered non-inferior. The relationship between the different assays was examined using Kendall rank correlations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The geometric mean ratios exceeded 0.67 using all assays for all COVID-19 and influenza vaccine combinations tested. Moderate rank correlations were found between the three assays.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>All three assays confirmed that vaccine co-administration did not significantly impact on immunogenicity of any of the vaccines tested.</div><div><strong>Trial registration:</strong> ISRCTN14391248, registered on 17/03/2021.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X2401051X/pdfft?md5=daf81b769761a25552b00d3b067afe66&pid=1-s2.0-S0264410X2401051X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X2401051X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X2401051X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景ComFluCOV试验测试了COVID-19和流感疫苗联合应用的安全性和免疫原性。使用针对 COVID-19 大流行而开发的检测方法测量了结合和功能性 SARS-CoV2 抗尖峰反应。方法18 岁以上的成人接种 COVID-19 和流感疫苗或生理盐水安慰剂。接种疫苗一个月后采集血清样本,使用商用内部酶联免疫吸附试验 (ELISA)、商用快速通量电化学发光免疫测定 (ECLIA) 和病毒中和试验 (VNA) 测定 SARS-CoV2 抗尖峰抗体浓度。采用几何平均比来比较接种或不接种流感疫苗对 COVID-19 的反应,以 0.67 为非劣效阈值。结果对所有 COVID-19 和流感疫苗组合进行测试后,所有检测方法的几何平均比均超过 0.67。结论所有三种检测方法都证实,联合接种疫苗不会对任何受试疫苗的免疫原性产生显著影响:试验注册:ISRCTN14391248,注册日期:2021年3月17日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of assays used to detect antibody response in COVID-19 vaccine trials: Results from of a UK multi-Centre randomised controlled trial to determine the immunogenicity responses of COVID-19 vaccines administered concomitantly with seasonal influenza vaccines (ComFluCOV)

Background

The ComFluCOV trial tested the safety and immunogenicity of COVID-19 and influenza vaccines co-administration. Binding and functional SARS-CoV2 anti-spike responses were measured using assays developed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The three assays used to measure the immunogenicity outcomes are reported here and their performance compared to inform future vaccine development.

Methods

Adults aged over 18 were vaccinated with a COVID-19 and either an influenza vaccine or saline placebo. Serum sampled one month after vaccination was used to measure SARS-CoV2 anti-spike antibody concentrations using a commercial in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), a commercial fast throughput electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) and a viral neutralisation assay (VNA). Geometric mean ratios were used to compare the response to COVID-19 with or without influenza vaccine with a threshold of 0.67 considered non-inferior. The relationship between the different assays was examined using Kendall rank correlations.

Results

The geometric mean ratios exceeded 0.67 using all assays for all COVID-19 and influenza vaccine combinations tested. Moderate rank correlations were found between the three assays.

Conclusion

All three assays confirmed that vaccine co-administration did not significantly impact on immunogenicity of any of the vaccines tested.
Trial registration: ISRCTN14391248, registered on 17/03/2021.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信