环境保护税政策与企业风险承担:来自中国的证据

IF 7.5 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
{"title":"环境保护税政策与企业风险承担:来自中国的证据","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The fight against pollution problems has sparked a myriad of Environmental Protection Tax (EPT) policies by governments across the globe. However, it remains unclear whether and how EPT affects the level of corporate risk-taking. To narrow the gap, this research selects the EPT policy implemented in 2018 as a quasi-natural experiment to test the effect of EPT on the level of corporate risk-taking by using the sample of Chinese listed firms from 2014 to 2022. The result finds that EPT could dampen the level of corporate risk-taking. Mechanism analysis shows that, the increased market attention, elevated financing costs, and raised investment in end-of-pipe pollution control are the mechanisms by which EPT reduces the level of corporate risk-taking. The “market pressure hypothesis” and “resource dependence hypothesis” of corporate risk-taking can help us better understand these three paths. Moreover, the heterogeneity analysis reveals that the disincentive effect is more pronounced in small enterprises, and those with high financing constraints and low institutional investor ownership. Meanwhile, the disincentive effect is also more pronounced for enterprises located in regions with underdeveloped digital financial inclusion and strong law enforcement. Overall, our findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of EPT on corporate risk-taking at the micro level and provide valuable insights for targeted policy enhancements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental protection tax policy and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The fight against pollution problems has sparked a myriad of Environmental Protection Tax (EPT) policies by governments across the globe. However, it remains unclear whether and how EPT affects the level of corporate risk-taking. To narrow the gap, this research selects the EPT policy implemented in 2018 as a quasi-natural experiment to test the effect of EPT on the level of corporate risk-taking by using the sample of Chinese listed firms from 2014 to 2022. The result finds that EPT could dampen the level of corporate risk-taking. Mechanism analysis shows that, the increased market attention, elevated financing costs, and raised investment in end-of-pipe pollution control are the mechanisms by which EPT reduces the level of corporate risk-taking. The “market pressure hypothesis” and “resource dependence hypothesis” of corporate risk-taking can help us better understand these three paths. Moreover, the heterogeneity analysis reveals that the disincentive effect is more pronounced in small enterprises, and those with high financing constraints and low institutional investor ownership. Meanwhile, the disincentive effect is also more pronounced for enterprises located in regions with underdeveloped digital financial inclusion and strong law enforcement. Overall, our findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of EPT on corporate risk-taking at the micro level and provide valuable insights for targeted policy enhancements.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924005234\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924005234","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为解决污染问题,世界各国政府纷纷出台环境保护税(EPT)政策。然而,EPT 是否以及如何影响企业的风险承担水平,目前仍不清楚。为缩小这一差距,本研究选取 2018 年实施的 EPT 政策作为准自然实验,以 2014 年至 2022 年的中国上市公司为样本,检验 EPT 对企业风险承担水平的影响。结果发现,EPT 可以抑制企业风险承担水平。机制分析表明,市场关注度提高、融资成本上升、末端污染治理投资增加是 EPT 降低企业风险承担水平的机制。企业风险承担的 "市场压力假说 "和 "资源依赖假说 "可以帮助我们更好地理解这三条路径。此外,异质性分析表明,抑制效应在小企业、融资约束高和机构投资者持股比例低的企业中更为明显。同时,对于位于数字金融普惠性不发达和执法力度较强地区的企业,抑制效应也更为明显。总之,我们的研究结果有助于更全面地了解 EPT 在微观层面上对企业风险承担的影响,并为有针对性的政策改进提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental protection tax policy and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China
The fight against pollution problems has sparked a myriad of Environmental Protection Tax (EPT) policies by governments across the globe. However, it remains unclear whether and how EPT affects the level of corporate risk-taking. To narrow the gap, this research selects the EPT policy implemented in 2018 as a quasi-natural experiment to test the effect of EPT on the level of corporate risk-taking by using the sample of Chinese listed firms from 2014 to 2022. The result finds that EPT could dampen the level of corporate risk-taking. Mechanism analysis shows that, the increased market attention, elevated financing costs, and raised investment in end-of-pipe pollution control are the mechanisms by which EPT reduces the level of corporate risk-taking. The “market pressure hypothesis” and “resource dependence hypothesis” of corporate risk-taking can help us better understand these three paths. Moreover, the heterogeneity analysis reveals that the disincentive effect is more pronounced in small enterprises, and those with high financing constraints and low institutional investor ownership. Meanwhile, the disincentive effect is also more pronounced for enterprises located in regions with underdeveloped digital financial inclusion and strong law enforcement. Overall, our findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of EPT on corporate risk-taking at the micro level and provide valuable insights for targeted policy enhancements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信