David Dylan García-Meléndez, Raquel Moreno Presa, Pilar Quintana Castro, Bárbara Serrano Calleja, Sara Rosenstone Calvo, María Isabel Morales-Casado
{"title":"利用结构和功能磁共振成像对轻度 COVID-19 引起的持续性嗅觉功能障碍患者进行成像对比研究","authors":"David Dylan García-Meléndez, Raquel Moreno Presa, Pilar Quintana Castro, Bárbara Serrano Calleja, Sara Rosenstone Calvo, María Isabel Morales-Casado","doi":"10.1016/j.medcle.2024.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Persistent post-COVID olfactory dysfunction continues to be studied due to the controversy in its pathophysiology and neuroimaging.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>The patients had confirmed mild COVID-19 infection with olfactory dysfunction of more than one month of evolution and they were compared to controls with normal olfaction, assessed using the Sniffin’ Sticks Olfactory Test and underwent brain, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the olfactory bulb and olfactory function.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 8 patients and 2 controls participated. The average age of the patients was 34.5 years (SD 8.5), and that of the controls was 28.5 (SD 2.1). The average score in the patients’ olfactory test was 7.9 points (SD 2.2). In brain and olfactory bulb MRI tests, no morphological differences were found. When evaluated by functional MRI, none of the patients activated the entorhinal area in comparison to the controls, who did show activation at this level. Activation of secondary olfactory areas in cases and controls were as follows: orbitofrontal (25% vs 100%), basal ganglia (25% vs 50%) and insula (38% vs 0%) respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There were no observed morphological changes in the brain MRI. Unlike the controls, none of the patients activated the entorhinal cortex in the olfactory functional MRI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74154,"journal":{"name":"Medicina clinica (English ed.)","volume":"163 6","pages":"Pages 286-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative imaging study of patients with persistent olfactory dysfunction due to mild COVID-19 using structural and functional MRI\",\"authors\":\"David Dylan García-Meléndez, Raquel Moreno Presa, Pilar Quintana Castro, Bárbara Serrano Calleja, Sara Rosenstone Calvo, María Isabel Morales-Casado\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medcle.2024.04.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Persistent post-COVID olfactory dysfunction continues to be studied due to the controversy in its pathophysiology and neuroimaging.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>The patients had confirmed mild COVID-19 infection with olfactory dysfunction of more than one month of evolution and they were compared to controls with normal olfaction, assessed using the Sniffin’ Sticks Olfactory Test and underwent brain, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the olfactory bulb and olfactory function.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 8 patients and 2 controls participated. The average age of the patients was 34.5 years (SD 8.5), and that of the controls was 28.5 (SD 2.1). The average score in the patients’ olfactory test was 7.9 points (SD 2.2). In brain and olfactory bulb MRI tests, no morphological differences were found. When evaluated by functional MRI, none of the patients activated the entorhinal area in comparison to the controls, who did show activation at this level. Activation of secondary olfactory areas in cases and controls were as follows: orbitofrontal (25% vs 100%), basal ganglia (25% vs 50%) and insula (38% vs 0%) respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There were no observed morphological changes in the brain MRI. Unlike the controls, none of the patients activated the entorhinal cortex in the olfactory functional MRI.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina clinica (English ed.)\",\"volume\":\"163 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 286-290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina clinica (English ed.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2387020624003991\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina clinica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2387020624003991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
材料与方法 患者确诊为轻度 COVID-19 感染,并伴有超过一个月的嗅觉功能障碍,将他们与嗅觉正常的对照组进行比较,使用嗅棒嗅觉测试(Sniffin' Sticks Olfactory Test)进行评估,并对嗅球和嗅觉功能进行脑部磁共振成像(MRI)检查。患者的平均年龄为 34.5 岁(SD 8.5),对照组的平均年龄为 28.5 岁(SD 2.1)。患者的嗅觉测试平均分为 7.9 分(标准差为 2.2 分)。在大脑和嗅球核磁共振成像测试中,没有发现任何形态学差异。通过功能性核磁共振成像进行评估时,与对照组相比,患者均未激活内嗅区,而对照组则显示激活了内嗅区。病例和对照组的次级嗅区激活情况如下:眶额叶(25% vs 100%)、基底节(25% vs 50%)和岛叶(38% vs 0%)。与对照组不同的是,在嗅觉功能磁共振成像中,没有一名患者激活了内侧皮层。
Comparative imaging study of patients with persistent olfactory dysfunction due to mild COVID-19 using structural and functional MRI
Introduction
Persistent post-COVID olfactory dysfunction continues to be studied due to the controversy in its pathophysiology and neuroimaging.
Materials and methods
The patients had confirmed mild COVID-19 infection with olfactory dysfunction of more than one month of evolution and they were compared to controls with normal olfaction, assessed using the Sniffin’ Sticks Olfactory Test and underwent brain, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the olfactory bulb and olfactory function.
Results
A total of 8 patients and 2 controls participated. The average age of the patients was 34.5 years (SD 8.5), and that of the controls was 28.5 (SD 2.1). The average score in the patients’ olfactory test was 7.9 points (SD 2.2). In brain and olfactory bulb MRI tests, no morphological differences were found. When evaluated by functional MRI, none of the patients activated the entorhinal area in comparison to the controls, who did show activation at this level. Activation of secondary olfactory areas in cases and controls were as follows: orbitofrontal (25% vs 100%), basal ganglia (25% vs 50%) and insula (38% vs 0%) respectively.
Conclusions
There were no observed morphological changes in the brain MRI. Unlike the controls, none of the patients activated the entorhinal cortex in the olfactory functional MRI.