聚类遗传算法调查:分类与实证分析

IF 8.2 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Hermes Robles-Berumen , Amelia Zafra , Sebastián Ventura
{"title":"聚类遗传算法调查:分类与实证分析","authors":"Hermes Robles-Berumen ,&nbsp;Amelia Zafra ,&nbsp;Sebastián Ventura","doi":"10.1016/j.swevo.2024.101720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Clustering, an unsupervised learning technique, aims to group patterns into clusters where similar patterns are grouped together, while dissimilar ones are placed in different clusters. This task can present itself as a complex optimization problem due to the extensive search space generated by all potential data partitions. Genetic Algorithms (GAs) have emerged as efficient tools for addressing this task. Consequently, significant advancements and numerous proposals have been developed in this field.</div><div>This work offers a comprehensive and critical review of state-of-the-art mono-objective Genetic Algorithms (GAs) for partitional clustering. From a more theoretical standpoint, it examines 22 well-known proposals in detail, covering their encoding strategies, objective functions, genetic operators, local search methods, and parent selection strategies. Based on this information, a specific taxonomy is proposed. In addition, from a more practical standpoint, a detailed experimental study is conducted to discern the advantages and disadvantages of approaches. Specifically, 22 different cluster validation indices are considered to compare the performance of clustering techniques. This evaluation is performed across 94 datasets encompassing diverse configurations, including the number of classes, separation between classes, and pattern dimensionality. Results reveal interesting findings, such as the key role of local search in optimizing results and reducing search space. Additionally, representations based on centroids and labels demonstrate greater efficiency and crossover and mutation operators do not prove to be as relevant. Ultimately, while the results are satisfactory, real-world clustering problems introduce additional complexity, especially for algorithms aiming to determine the number of clusters, resulting in diminished performance and the need for new approaches to be explored. Code, datasets and instructions to run algorithms in the LEAL library are available in an associated repository, in order to facilitate future experiments in this environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48682,"journal":{"name":"Swarm and Evolutionary Computation","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 101720"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of genetic algorithms for clustering: Taxonomy and empirical analysis\",\"authors\":\"Hermes Robles-Berumen ,&nbsp;Amelia Zafra ,&nbsp;Sebastián Ventura\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.swevo.2024.101720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Clustering, an unsupervised learning technique, aims to group patterns into clusters where similar patterns are grouped together, while dissimilar ones are placed in different clusters. This task can present itself as a complex optimization problem due to the extensive search space generated by all potential data partitions. Genetic Algorithms (GAs) have emerged as efficient tools for addressing this task. Consequently, significant advancements and numerous proposals have been developed in this field.</div><div>This work offers a comprehensive and critical review of state-of-the-art mono-objective Genetic Algorithms (GAs) for partitional clustering. From a more theoretical standpoint, it examines 22 well-known proposals in detail, covering their encoding strategies, objective functions, genetic operators, local search methods, and parent selection strategies. Based on this information, a specific taxonomy is proposed. In addition, from a more practical standpoint, a detailed experimental study is conducted to discern the advantages and disadvantages of approaches. Specifically, 22 different cluster validation indices are considered to compare the performance of clustering techniques. This evaluation is performed across 94 datasets encompassing diverse configurations, including the number of classes, separation between classes, and pattern dimensionality. Results reveal interesting findings, such as the key role of local search in optimizing results and reducing search space. Additionally, representations based on centroids and labels demonstrate greater efficiency and crossover and mutation operators do not prove to be as relevant. Ultimately, while the results are satisfactory, real-world clustering problems introduce additional complexity, especially for algorithms aiming to determine the number of clusters, resulting in diminished performance and the need for new approaches to be explored. Code, datasets and instructions to run algorithms in the LEAL library are available in an associated repository, in order to facilitate future experiments in this environment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Swarm and Evolutionary Computation\",\"volume\":\"91 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101720\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Swarm and Evolutionary Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221065022400258X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swarm and Evolutionary Computation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221065022400258X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

聚类(Clustering)是一种无监督学习技术,其目的是将模式归类为簇,其中相似的模式归为一组,而不相似的模式则归入不同的簇。由于所有潜在的数据分区都会产生巨大的搜索空间,因此这项任务本身就是一个复杂的优化问题。遗传算法(GA)已成为解决这一任务的有效工具。因此,该领域取得了重大进展,并提出了许多建议。本研究对用于分区聚类的最先进的单目标遗传算法(GA)进行了全面而严谨的评述。从理论角度出发,它详细研究了 22 项著名的建议,包括编码策略、目标函数、遗传算子、局部搜索方法和父系选择策略。在此基础上,提出了具体的分类方法。此外,从更实际的角度出发,还进行了详细的实验研究,以辨别各种方法的优缺点。具体来说,考虑了 22 种不同的聚类验证指数,以比较聚类技术的性能。这项评估是在 94 个数据集上进行的,这些数据集包含不同的配置,包括类的数量、类之间的分离度和模式维度。结果揭示了一些有趣的发现,如局部搜索在优化结果和减少搜索空间方面的关键作用。此外,基于中心点和标签的表示法表现出更高的效率,而交叉和突变算子则没有那么重要。最终,虽然结果令人满意,但现实世界中的聚类问题带来了额外的复杂性,特别是对于旨在确定聚类数量的算法,导致性能下降,需要探索新的方法。LEAL 库中的代码、数据集和算法运行说明可在一个相关的资源库中获得,以方便未来在此环境中进行实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A survey of genetic algorithms for clustering: Taxonomy and empirical analysis
Clustering, an unsupervised learning technique, aims to group patterns into clusters where similar patterns are grouped together, while dissimilar ones are placed in different clusters. This task can present itself as a complex optimization problem due to the extensive search space generated by all potential data partitions. Genetic Algorithms (GAs) have emerged as efficient tools for addressing this task. Consequently, significant advancements and numerous proposals have been developed in this field.
This work offers a comprehensive and critical review of state-of-the-art mono-objective Genetic Algorithms (GAs) for partitional clustering. From a more theoretical standpoint, it examines 22 well-known proposals in detail, covering their encoding strategies, objective functions, genetic operators, local search methods, and parent selection strategies. Based on this information, a specific taxonomy is proposed. In addition, from a more practical standpoint, a detailed experimental study is conducted to discern the advantages and disadvantages of approaches. Specifically, 22 different cluster validation indices are considered to compare the performance of clustering techniques. This evaluation is performed across 94 datasets encompassing diverse configurations, including the number of classes, separation between classes, and pattern dimensionality. Results reveal interesting findings, such as the key role of local search in optimizing results and reducing search space. Additionally, representations based on centroids and labels demonstrate greater efficiency and crossover and mutation operators do not prove to be as relevant. Ultimately, while the results are satisfactory, real-world clustering problems introduce additional complexity, especially for algorithms aiming to determine the number of clusters, resulting in diminished performance and the need for new approaches to be explored. Code, datasets and instructions to run algorithms in the LEAL library are available in an associated repository, in order to facilitate future experiments in this environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Swarm and Evolutionary Computation
Swarm and Evolutionary Computation COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEC-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
169
期刊介绍: Swarm and Evolutionary Computation is a pioneering peer-reviewed journal focused on the latest research and advancements in nature-inspired intelligent computation using swarm and evolutionary algorithms. It covers theoretical, experimental, and practical aspects of these paradigms and their hybrids, promoting interdisciplinary research. The journal prioritizes the publication of high-quality, original articles that push the boundaries of evolutionary computation and swarm intelligence. Additionally, it welcomes survey papers on current topics and novel applications. Topics of interest include but are not limited to: Genetic Algorithms, and Genetic Programming, Evolution Strategies, and Evolutionary Programming, Differential Evolution, Artificial Immune Systems, Particle Swarms, Ant Colony, Bacterial Foraging, Artificial Bees, Fireflies Algorithm, Harmony Search, Artificial Life, Digital Organisms, Estimation of Distribution Algorithms, Stochastic Diffusion Search, Quantum Computing, Nano Computing, Membrane Computing, Human-centric Computing, Hybridization of Algorithms, Memetic Computing, Autonomic Computing, Self-organizing systems, Combinatorial, Discrete, Binary, Constrained, Multi-objective, Multi-modal, Dynamic, and Large-scale Optimization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信