Dilapan S 与 Foley 球囊在宫颈诱导前成熟术中的疗效比较--非劣效性试验

{"title":"Dilapan S 与 Foley 球囊在宫颈诱导前成熟术中的疗效比较--非劣效性试验","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The need for induction of labor is increasing in present obstetric practice. The available non-pharmacological methods for cervical ripening at term are Foley balloon and Dilapan-S. With the gaining popularity of Dilapan-S worldwide, there are very few clinical trials conducted in India to evaluate its effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the efficacy of Dilapan-S and Foley balloons for pre-induction cervical ripening.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>This single-center randomized non-inferiority trial included primi- and multi-gravida women between 37 and 41 weeks of gestation and unfavourable cervix with a Bishop's score between 0 and 2. Using a random number table, patients were assigned to study Group 1 Dilapan-S and to control Group 2 Foley balloon. Dilapan-S or Foley balloon was inserted intracervically and assessed for dilation after 12 hours. Patients with unfavourable dilatation were further provided prostaglandins (PgE 1 and 2) for further augmentation of induction. Primary outcome measures included improvement in Bishop's score, and mode of delivery, followed by time to delivery from intervention, use of other augmentation methods, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After screening, 296 patients with Bishop score less than 2, (148 in each group) were enrolled in the study. The number of patients who had vaginal delivery was comparable between both groups (<em>p</em>=.72), and so were the maternal outcomes. Two cases of cord prolapse occurred with Foley balloon. Group 2 showed significant improvement in Bishop's score (<em>p</em>&lt;.001), and Group 1 had a significantly higher use of augmentation with PgE1 (<em>p</em>-.01) and PgE2 (<em>p</em>&lt;.001). The number of contractions was significantly lower in Group 1 (<em>p</em>&lt;.001), and contraction intensity was higher in Group 2. There was no significant difference in cesarean delivery for failed induction of labor between the groups (<em>p</em>=.72). Based on the primary outcome measure, Dilapan-S was found to be non-inferior to the Foley balloon.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dilapan-S is non-inferior to Foley balloon in achieving pre-induction cervical ripening in term pregnancies, and therefore Dilapan-S can be suggested as an alternative in clinical practice with minimal risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824000819/pdfft?md5=11bcf4a70769963288838286133b452d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666577824000819-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Dilapan S compared to foley balloon in preinduction cervical ripening—a noninferiority trial\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The need for induction of labor is increasing in present obstetric practice. The available non-pharmacological methods for cervical ripening at term are Foley balloon and Dilapan-S. With the gaining popularity of Dilapan-S worldwide, there are very few clinical trials conducted in India to evaluate its effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the efficacy of Dilapan-S and Foley balloons for pre-induction cervical ripening.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>This single-center randomized non-inferiority trial included primi- and multi-gravida women between 37 and 41 weeks of gestation and unfavourable cervix with a Bishop's score between 0 and 2. Using a random number table, patients were assigned to study Group 1 Dilapan-S and to control Group 2 Foley balloon. Dilapan-S or Foley balloon was inserted intracervically and assessed for dilation after 12 hours. Patients with unfavourable dilatation were further provided prostaglandins (PgE 1 and 2) for further augmentation of induction. Primary outcome measures included improvement in Bishop's score, and mode of delivery, followed by time to delivery from intervention, use of other augmentation methods, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After screening, 296 patients with Bishop score less than 2, (148 in each group) were enrolled in the study. The number of patients who had vaginal delivery was comparable between both groups (<em>p</em>=.72), and so were the maternal outcomes. Two cases of cord prolapse occurred with Foley balloon. Group 2 showed significant improvement in Bishop's score (<em>p</em>&lt;.001), and Group 1 had a significantly higher use of augmentation with PgE1 (<em>p</em>-.01) and PgE2 (<em>p</em>&lt;.001). The number of contractions was significantly lower in Group 1 (<em>p</em>&lt;.001), and contraction intensity was higher in Group 2. There was no significant difference in cesarean delivery for failed induction of labor between the groups (<em>p</em>=.72). Based on the primary outcome measure, Dilapan-S was found to be non-inferior to the Foley balloon.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dilapan-S is non-inferior to Foley balloon in achieving pre-induction cervical ripening in term pregnancies, and therefore Dilapan-S can be suggested as an alternative in clinical practice with minimal risks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJOG global reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824000819/pdfft?md5=11bcf4a70769963288838286133b452d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666577824000819-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJOG global reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824000819\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824000819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在目前的产科实践中,引产的需求日益增加。临产时宫颈成熟的非药物方法有 Foley 球囊和 Dilapan-S。研究设计这项单中心随机非劣效性试验纳入了妊娠 37 至 41 周、宫颈不佳且 Bishop 评分在 0 至 2 之间的初产妇和多产妇。通过随机数字表,患者被分配到研究组 1 Dilapan-S 和对照组 2 Foley balloon。在宫颈内插入 Dilapan-S 或 Foley 球囊,12 小时后评估扩张情况。扩张效果不佳的患者将进一步使用前列腺素(PgE 1 和 PgE 2),以进一步增强诱导效果。主要结果指标包括 Bishop 评分的改善情况和分娩方式,其次是干预后的分娩时间、其他扩容方法的使用情况以及产妇和新生儿的预后。结果经过筛选,296 名 Bishop 评分低于 2 分的患者(每组 148 人)被纳入研究。两组患者中经阴道分娩的人数相当(P=0.72),产妇结局也相当。使用 Foley 球囊时发生了两例脐带脱垂。第 2 组的 Bishop 评分有明显改善(p<.001),而第 1 组使用 PgE1(p-.01)和 PgE2(p<.001)扩容的比例明显更高。第一组的宫缩次数明显较少(p<.001),第二组的宫缩强度较高。结论 在足月妊娠引产前宫颈成熟方面,Dilapan-S 的效果优于 Foley 球囊,因此在临床实践中,Dilapan-S 可作为一种风险最小的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Dilapan S compared to foley balloon in preinduction cervical ripening—a noninferiority trial

Background

The need for induction of labor is increasing in present obstetric practice. The available non-pharmacological methods for cervical ripening at term are Foley balloon and Dilapan-S. With the gaining popularity of Dilapan-S worldwide, there are very few clinical trials conducted in India to evaluate its effectiveness.

Objective

To compare the efficacy of Dilapan-S and Foley balloons for pre-induction cervical ripening.

Study design

This single-center randomized non-inferiority trial included primi- and multi-gravida women between 37 and 41 weeks of gestation and unfavourable cervix with a Bishop's score between 0 and 2. Using a random number table, patients were assigned to study Group 1 Dilapan-S and to control Group 2 Foley balloon. Dilapan-S or Foley balloon was inserted intracervically and assessed for dilation after 12 hours. Patients with unfavourable dilatation were further provided prostaglandins (PgE 1 and 2) for further augmentation of induction. Primary outcome measures included improvement in Bishop's score, and mode of delivery, followed by time to delivery from intervention, use of other augmentation methods, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Results

After screening, 296 patients with Bishop score less than 2, (148 in each group) were enrolled in the study. The number of patients who had vaginal delivery was comparable between both groups (p=.72), and so were the maternal outcomes. Two cases of cord prolapse occurred with Foley balloon. Group 2 showed significant improvement in Bishop's score (p<.001), and Group 1 had a significantly higher use of augmentation with PgE1 (p-.01) and PgE2 (p<.001). The number of contractions was significantly lower in Group 1 (p<.001), and contraction intensity was higher in Group 2. There was no significant difference in cesarean delivery for failed induction of labor between the groups (p=.72). Based on the primary outcome measure, Dilapan-S was found to be non-inferior to the Foley balloon.

Conclusion

Dilapan-S is non-inferior to Foley balloon in achieving pre-induction cervical ripening in term pregnancies, and therefore Dilapan-S can be suggested as an alternative in clinical practice with minimal risks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信