Intercomparison of citrus evapotranspiration among eddy covariance, OpenET ensemble models, and the Water and Energy Balance Model (BAITSSS)

Remote sensing-based surface energy balance algorithms have been used to estimate water use of various crops. However, citrus evapotranspiration (ET) estimation is challenging mainly due to evergreen leaves and a clumped canopy structure. In this study, we evaluated the performance of two methods for calculating ET: the ensemble of OpenET models, which are mostly satellite thermal-based models, and the BAITSSS water and energy balance model. Calculated ET was compared with (i.) eddy covariance (EC) ET measurements and (ii.) water received (irrigation plus precipitation) data for two citrus orchards in San Joaquin Valley, California. Polaris-based soil hydraulic properties and measured volumetric water content were used for BAITSSS parameterization and initialization, respectively. Sentinel-2 based NDVI was used for BAITSSS simulation. Results showed that annual ET based on the OpenET ensemble model (1169 mm) was on average 30 % larger (r² ∼ 0.71, RMSE ∼ 1.16 mm) than both EC ET (908 mm) and water received (886 mm). The disparity mostly occurred in spring. BAITSSS, on the other hand, showed mixed results compared to observations (r² ∼ 0.77, RMSE ∼ 0.94 mm). Both measured from EC and modeled ET from BAITSSS and ensemble OpenET values were below grass reference ET (ET_o) for the majority of the simulation period. Soil moisture and water received data indicated the orchards may have been deficit irrigated. Overall, this study highlights the challenges of ET modeling in citrus orchards and the need for improved estimation of ET for this specialty crop.