利用时空通用克里金法实时评估活林燃料含水量和可燃性

IF 2.6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Andrea Viñuales , Fernando Montes , Mercedes Guijarro , Cristina Gómez , Ignacio de la Calle , Javier Madrigal
{"title":"利用时空通用克里金法实时评估活林燃料含水量和可燃性","authors":"Andrea Viñuales ,&nbsp;Fernando Montes ,&nbsp;Mercedes Guijarro ,&nbsp;Cristina Gómez ,&nbsp;Ignacio de la Calle ,&nbsp;Javier Madrigal","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the critical role that live fuel moisture content (LFMC) plays in shaping both fire occurrence and behaviour, integration of this factor in wildfire risk assessment remains constrained. Similarly, although flammability is a key factor, its cartographic representation at landscape level poses serious challenges, primarily due to the reliance on bench-scale laboratory experiments for obtaining data. This study aimed to evaluate the spatial and temporal dynamics of LFMC and fuel flammability quantified by the peak heat release rate (PHRR), within a fire-prone forest region in southern Spain. This vulnerable Mediterranean ecosystem is characterized by the prevalence of <em>Pinus pinea L.</em> forests and <em>Cistus ladanifer L.</em> shrublands. LFMC was assessed in fifteen field surveys spanning two fire seasons, across thirty-eight sampling plots, by spatio-temporal universal kriging (UK). Similarly, flammability was assessed in eight surveys, including one fire season, across eight sampling plots, by spatio-temporal universal cokriging (UCK). The auxiliary variables considered were temperature, seasonality, insolation and spectral indices derived from Sentinel-2 and MODIS satellite-derived data. The resulting models exhibited good accuracy, with RMSE values ranging from 11.78 % to 11.89 % for LFMC calibration and between 19.84 % and 20.15 % for the validation data set. Similarly, regarding flammability, RMSE values ranged from 24.08 % to 24.10 % for calibration and between 30.63 % and 30.66 % for validation. LFMC and flammability maps were generated. Temporal autocorrelation in the LFMC models had a significant impact on their performance, whereas PHRR demonstrated a stronger influence through spatial autocorrelation. These unprecedented findings are of great importance in fire behaviour analysis, as the concurrent use of LFMC and PHRR appears to yield diverse yet complementary insights. The use of these techniques, previously unexplored for this specific purpose, marks a significant advance in the field of forest fuel modelling and fire risk evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51043,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Modelling","volume":"498 ","pages":"Article 110867"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380024002552/pdfft?md5=0ca5496b55168031e3ae81515d963354&pid=1-s2.0-S0304380024002552-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-time assessment of live forest fuel moisture content and flammability by using space-time universal kriging\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Viñuales ,&nbsp;Fernando Montes ,&nbsp;Mercedes Guijarro ,&nbsp;Cristina Gómez ,&nbsp;Ignacio de la Calle ,&nbsp;Javier Madrigal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite the critical role that live fuel moisture content (LFMC) plays in shaping both fire occurrence and behaviour, integration of this factor in wildfire risk assessment remains constrained. Similarly, although flammability is a key factor, its cartographic representation at landscape level poses serious challenges, primarily due to the reliance on bench-scale laboratory experiments for obtaining data. This study aimed to evaluate the spatial and temporal dynamics of LFMC and fuel flammability quantified by the peak heat release rate (PHRR), within a fire-prone forest region in southern Spain. This vulnerable Mediterranean ecosystem is characterized by the prevalence of <em>Pinus pinea L.</em> forests and <em>Cistus ladanifer L.</em> shrublands. LFMC was assessed in fifteen field surveys spanning two fire seasons, across thirty-eight sampling plots, by spatio-temporal universal kriging (UK). Similarly, flammability was assessed in eight surveys, including one fire season, across eight sampling plots, by spatio-temporal universal cokriging (UCK). The auxiliary variables considered were temperature, seasonality, insolation and spectral indices derived from Sentinel-2 and MODIS satellite-derived data. The resulting models exhibited good accuracy, with RMSE values ranging from 11.78 % to 11.89 % for LFMC calibration and between 19.84 % and 20.15 % for the validation data set. Similarly, regarding flammability, RMSE values ranged from 24.08 % to 24.10 % for calibration and between 30.63 % and 30.66 % for validation. LFMC and flammability maps were generated. Temporal autocorrelation in the LFMC models had a significant impact on their performance, whereas PHRR demonstrated a stronger influence through spatial autocorrelation. These unprecedented findings are of great importance in fire behaviour analysis, as the concurrent use of LFMC and PHRR appears to yield diverse yet complementary insights. The use of these techniques, previously unexplored for this specific purpose, marks a significant advance in the field of forest fuel modelling and fire risk evaluation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Modelling\",\"volume\":\"498 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110867\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380024002552/pdfft?md5=0ca5496b55168031e3ae81515d963354&pid=1-s2.0-S0304380024002552-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380024002552\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380024002552","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管活燃料含水量(LFMC)在影响火灾发生和行为方面起着关键作用,但将这一因素纳入野火风险评估仍然受到限制。同样,尽管可燃性是一个关键因素,但其在景观层面上的制图表达却面临着严峻的挑战,这主要是由于依赖台架规模的实验室实验来获取数据。本研究旨在评估西班牙南部森林火灾易发区内的 LFMC 和以峰值热释放率 (PHRR) 量化的燃料可燃性的时空动态。这个脆弱的地中海生态系统的特点是松树林和 Cistus ladanifer L.灌木林的普遍存在。通过时空通用克里格法(UK),在跨越两个火灾季节的十五次实地调查中,对三十八个取样地块的可燃性进行了评估。同样,通过时空通用克里格法(UCK)对八个取样地块进行了八次调查(包括一个火灾季节),评估了可燃性。所考虑的辅助变量包括温度、季节性、日照和从哨兵-2 和 MODIS 卫星数据中得出的光谱指数。结果表明模型具有良好的准确性,LFMC 校准的均方根误差值在 11.78 % 到 11.89 % 之间,验证数据集的均方根误差值在 19.84 % 到 20.15 % 之间。同样,在可燃性方面,校准的 RMSE 值介于 24.08 % 到 24.10 % 之间,验证的 RMSE 值介于 30.63 % 到 30.66 % 之间。生成了 LFMC 和易燃性地图。LFMC 模型中的时间自相关性对其性能有显著影响,而 PHRR 则通过空间自相关性显示出更大的影响。这些史无前例的发现对火灾行为分析具有重要意义,因为同时使用 LFMC 和 PHRR 似乎能产生不同但互补的见解。这些技术以前从未被用于这一特定目的,它们的使用标志着森林燃料建模和火灾风险评估领域的重大进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-time assessment of live forest fuel moisture content and flammability by using space-time universal kriging
Despite the critical role that live fuel moisture content (LFMC) plays in shaping both fire occurrence and behaviour, integration of this factor in wildfire risk assessment remains constrained. Similarly, although flammability is a key factor, its cartographic representation at landscape level poses serious challenges, primarily due to the reliance on bench-scale laboratory experiments for obtaining data. This study aimed to evaluate the spatial and temporal dynamics of LFMC and fuel flammability quantified by the peak heat release rate (PHRR), within a fire-prone forest region in southern Spain. This vulnerable Mediterranean ecosystem is characterized by the prevalence of Pinus pinea L. forests and Cistus ladanifer L. shrublands. LFMC was assessed in fifteen field surveys spanning two fire seasons, across thirty-eight sampling plots, by spatio-temporal universal kriging (UK). Similarly, flammability was assessed in eight surveys, including one fire season, across eight sampling plots, by spatio-temporal universal cokriging (UCK). The auxiliary variables considered were temperature, seasonality, insolation and spectral indices derived from Sentinel-2 and MODIS satellite-derived data. The resulting models exhibited good accuracy, with RMSE values ranging from 11.78 % to 11.89 % for LFMC calibration and between 19.84 % and 20.15 % for the validation data set. Similarly, regarding flammability, RMSE values ranged from 24.08 % to 24.10 % for calibration and between 30.63 % and 30.66 % for validation. LFMC and flammability maps were generated. Temporal autocorrelation in the LFMC models had a significant impact on their performance, whereas PHRR demonstrated a stronger influence through spatial autocorrelation. These unprecedented findings are of great importance in fire behaviour analysis, as the concurrent use of LFMC and PHRR appears to yield diverse yet complementary insights. The use of these techniques, previously unexplored for this specific purpose, marks a significant advance in the field of forest fuel modelling and fire risk evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Modelling
Ecological Modelling 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
259
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The journal is concerned with the use of mathematical models and systems analysis for the description of ecological processes and for the sustainable management of resources. Human activity and well-being are dependent on and integrated with the functioning of ecosystems and the services they provide. We aim to understand these basic ecosystem functions using mathematical and conceptual modelling, systems analysis, thermodynamics, computer simulations, and ecological theory. This leads to a preference for process-based models embedded in theory with explicit causative agents as opposed to strictly statistical or correlative descriptions. These modelling methods can be applied to a wide spectrum of issues ranging from basic ecology to human ecology to socio-ecological systems. The journal welcomes research articles, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, book reviews, and other communications. The journal also supports the activities of the [International Society of Ecological Modelling (ISEM)](http://www.isemna.org/).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信