受过精英教育的首席执行官如何选择并购支付方式?来自台湾的证据

IF 4.8 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Dun-Yao Ke , Xuan-Qi Su
{"title":"受过精英教育的首席执行官如何选择并购支付方式?来自台湾的证据","authors":"Dun-Yao Ke ,&nbsp;Xuan-Qi Su","doi":"10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the influence of CEOs with elite educations on the selection of payment methods in mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;A). Analyzing a unique hand-collected dataset of M&amp;A announcements involving Taiwanese acquirers during 2007–2020, we find that acquirers led by elite-educated CEOs are more likely to opt for cash financing in M&amp;A transactions, a preference that persists even after conducting robustness tests and addressing endogeneity bias. Elite-educated CEOs with a Ph.D. or Master's degree in management- or finance-related disciplines are further found to exhibit a marked preference for cash payments, particularly when their firms face greater financial constraints. These observations can be attributed to potentially lower costs of external funding and might also reflect a perception among these CEOs that their firms are undervalued, as posited by both the financing proficiency hypothesis and the overconfidence trait hypothesis. By dissecting distinct implications of these two hypotheses for M&amp;A valuation, we finally examine and show that acquirers led by elite-educated CEOs, particularly those choosing cash for M&amp;A financing, experience superior post-M&amp;A stock returns and operational performance. Our conclusion thus suggests that the financial acumen derived from elite education, rather than overconfidence, predominantly influences M&amp;A payment methods and favorably impacts subsequent valuation outcomes. Overall, this study represents a pioneering effort to shed light on the often-overlooked role of top executives' elite educational backgrounds in strategic decision-making within the context of M&amp;A.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48074,"journal":{"name":"Pacific-Basin Finance Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Do Elite-Educated CEOs Choose the M&A Payment Method? Evidence from Taiwan\",\"authors\":\"Dun-Yao Ke ,&nbsp;Xuan-Qi Su\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper examines the influence of CEOs with elite educations on the selection of payment methods in mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;A). Analyzing a unique hand-collected dataset of M&amp;A announcements involving Taiwanese acquirers during 2007–2020, we find that acquirers led by elite-educated CEOs are more likely to opt for cash financing in M&amp;A transactions, a preference that persists even after conducting robustness tests and addressing endogeneity bias. Elite-educated CEOs with a Ph.D. or Master's degree in management- or finance-related disciplines are further found to exhibit a marked preference for cash payments, particularly when their firms face greater financial constraints. These observations can be attributed to potentially lower costs of external funding and might also reflect a perception among these CEOs that their firms are undervalued, as posited by both the financing proficiency hypothesis and the overconfidence trait hypothesis. By dissecting distinct implications of these two hypotheses for M&amp;A valuation, we finally examine and show that acquirers led by elite-educated CEOs, particularly those choosing cash for M&amp;A financing, experience superior post-M&amp;A stock returns and operational performance. Our conclusion thus suggests that the financial acumen derived from elite education, rather than overconfidence, predominantly influences M&amp;A payment methods and favorably impacts subsequent valuation outcomes. Overall, this study represents a pioneering effort to shed light on the often-overlooked role of top executives' elite educational backgrounds in strategic decision-making within the context of M&amp;A.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacific-Basin Finance Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacific-Basin Finance Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X24002877\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific-Basin Finance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X24002877","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了受过精英教育的首席执行官对并购(M&A)中支付方式选择的影响。通过分析手工收集的 2007-2020 年间涉及台湾收购方的并购公告数据集,我们发现精英教育背景的首席执行官领导的收购方在并购交易中更倾向于选择现金融资,即使在进行稳健性检验和解决内生性偏差后,这种偏好依然存在。受过精英教育、拥有管理或金融相关学科博士或硕士学位的首席执行官还表现出明显的现金支付偏好,尤其是当他们的公司面临更大的财务限制时。这些观察结果可以归因于外部融资的潜在成本较低,也可能反映出这些首席执行官认为其公司价值被低估,正如融资能力假说和过度自信特质假说所假设的那样。通过剖析这两个假说对并购估值的不同影响,我们最终研究并表明,由受过精英教育的首席执行官领导的并购方,尤其是那些选择现金进行并购融资的并购方,在并购后的股票回报和经营业绩都非常出色。因此,我们的结论表明,精英教育所带来的财务敏锐度,而不是过度自信,是影响并购支付方式的主要因素,并对随后的估值结果产生有利影响。总之,这项研究是一项开创性的工作,它揭示了高层管理人员的精英教育背景在 M&A 背景下的战略决策中经常被忽视的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Do Elite-Educated CEOs Choose the M&A Payment Method? Evidence from Taiwan
This paper examines the influence of CEOs with elite educations on the selection of payment methods in mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Analyzing a unique hand-collected dataset of M&A announcements involving Taiwanese acquirers during 2007–2020, we find that acquirers led by elite-educated CEOs are more likely to opt for cash financing in M&A transactions, a preference that persists even after conducting robustness tests and addressing endogeneity bias. Elite-educated CEOs with a Ph.D. or Master's degree in management- or finance-related disciplines are further found to exhibit a marked preference for cash payments, particularly when their firms face greater financial constraints. These observations can be attributed to potentially lower costs of external funding and might also reflect a perception among these CEOs that their firms are undervalued, as posited by both the financing proficiency hypothesis and the overconfidence trait hypothesis. By dissecting distinct implications of these two hypotheses for M&A valuation, we finally examine and show that acquirers led by elite-educated CEOs, particularly those choosing cash for M&A financing, experience superior post-M&A stock returns and operational performance. Our conclusion thus suggests that the financial acumen derived from elite education, rather than overconfidence, predominantly influences M&A payment methods and favorably impacts subsequent valuation outcomes. Overall, this study represents a pioneering effort to shed light on the often-overlooked role of top executives' elite educational backgrounds in strategic decision-making within the context of M&A.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: The Pacific-Basin Finance Journal is aimed at providing a specialized forum for the publication of academic research on capital markets of the Asia-Pacific countries. Primary emphasis will be placed on the highest quality empirical and theoretical research in the following areas: • Market Micro-structure; • Investment and Portfolio Management; • Theories of Market Equilibrium; • Valuation of Financial and Real Assets; • Behavior of Asset Prices in Financial Sectors; • Normative Theory of Financial Management; • Capital Markets of Development; • Market Mechanisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信