基于人工智能的乳腺 X 射线摄影和断层扫描技术≤ 2 厘米乳房肿块分类策略

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Zhenzhen Shao , Yuxin Cai , Yujuan Hao , Congyi Hu , Ziling Yu , Yue Shen , Fei Gao , Fandong Zhang , Wenjuan Ma , Qian Zhou , Jingjing Chen , Hong Lu
{"title":"基于人工智能的乳腺 X 射线摄影和断层扫描技术≤ 2 厘米乳房肿块分类策略","authors":"Zhenzhen Shao ,&nbsp;Yuxin Cai ,&nbsp;Yujuan Hao ,&nbsp;Congyi Hu ,&nbsp;Ziling Yu ,&nbsp;Yue Shen ,&nbsp;Fei Gao ,&nbsp;Fandong Zhang ,&nbsp;Wenjuan Ma ,&nbsp;Qian Zhou ,&nbsp;Jingjing Chen ,&nbsp;Hong Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the diagnosis performance of digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), DM combined DBT with AI-based strategies for breast mass ≤ 2 cm.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>DM and DBT images in 483 patients including 512 breast masses were acquired from November 2018 to November 2019. Malignant and benign tumours were determined by biopsies using histological analysis and follow-up within 24 months. The radiomics and deep learning methods were employed to extract the breast mass features in images and finally for benign and malignant classification. The DM, DBT and DM combined DBT (DM + DBT) images were fed into radiomics and deep learning models to construct corresponding models, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was employed to estimate model performance. An external dataset of 146 patients from March 2021 to December 2022 from another center was enrolled for external validation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the internal testing dataset, compared with the DM model and the DBT model, the DM + DBT models based on radiomics and deep learning both showed statistically significant higher AUCs [0.810 (RA-DM), 0.823 (RA-DBT) and 0.869 (RA-DM + DBT), P ≤ 0.001; 0.867 (DL-DM), 0.871 (DL-DBT) and 0.908 (DL-DM + DBT), P = 0.001]. The deep learning models present superior to the radiomics models in the experiments with only DM (0.867 vs 0.810, P = 0.001), only DBT (0.871 vs 0.823, P = 0.001) and DM + DBT (0.908 vs 0.869, P = 0.003).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>DBT has a clear additional value for diagnosing breast mass less than 2 cm compared with only DM. AI-based methods, especially deep learning, can help achieve excellent performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 103805"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096097762400136X/pdfft?md5=23778896652ae9c47710fa8e71a02f2e&pid=1-s2.0-S096097762400136X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-based strategies in breast mass ≤ 2 cm classification with mammography and tomosynthesis\",\"authors\":\"Zhenzhen Shao ,&nbsp;Yuxin Cai ,&nbsp;Yujuan Hao ,&nbsp;Congyi Hu ,&nbsp;Ziling Yu ,&nbsp;Yue Shen ,&nbsp;Fei Gao ,&nbsp;Fandong Zhang ,&nbsp;Wenjuan Ma ,&nbsp;Qian Zhou ,&nbsp;Jingjing Chen ,&nbsp;Hong Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the diagnosis performance of digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), DM combined DBT with AI-based strategies for breast mass ≤ 2 cm.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>DM and DBT images in 483 patients including 512 breast masses were acquired from November 2018 to November 2019. Malignant and benign tumours were determined by biopsies using histological analysis and follow-up within 24 months. The radiomics and deep learning methods were employed to extract the breast mass features in images and finally for benign and malignant classification. The DM, DBT and DM combined DBT (DM + DBT) images were fed into radiomics and deep learning models to construct corresponding models, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was employed to estimate model performance. An external dataset of 146 patients from March 2021 to December 2022 from another center was enrolled for external validation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the internal testing dataset, compared with the DM model and the DBT model, the DM + DBT models based on radiomics and deep learning both showed statistically significant higher AUCs [0.810 (RA-DM), 0.823 (RA-DBT) and 0.869 (RA-DM + DBT), P ≤ 0.001; 0.867 (DL-DM), 0.871 (DL-DBT) and 0.908 (DL-DM + DBT), P = 0.001]. The deep learning models present superior to the radiomics models in the experiments with only DM (0.867 vs 0.810, P = 0.001), only DBT (0.871 vs 0.823, P = 0.001) and DM + DBT (0.908 vs 0.869, P = 0.003).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>DBT has a clear additional value for diagnosing breast mass less than 2 cm compared with only DM. AI-based methods, especially deep learning, can help achieve excellent performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast\",\"volume\":\"78 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103805\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096097762400136X/pdfft?md5=23778896652ae9c47710fa8e71a02f2e&pid=1-s2.0-S096097762400136X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096097762400136X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096097762400136X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估数字乳腺X线摄影(DM)和数字乳腺断层扫描(DBT)的诊断性能,DM结合DBT与基于人工智能的策略对≤2厘米的乳腺肿块的诊断性能。材料和方法从2018年11月至2019年11月采集了483名患者的DM和DBT图像,包括512个乳腺肿块。通过组织学分析和24个月内的随访,活检确定恶性和良性肿瘤。采用放射组学和深度学习方法提取图像中的乳腺肿块特征,最后进行良恶性分类。将DM、DBT和DM联合DBT(DM + DBT)图像分别输入放射组学和深度学习模型,构建相应的模型。接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)用于估算模型性能。结果在内部测试数据集中,与DM模型和DBT模型相比,基于放射组学和深度学习的DM + DBT模型的AUCs均有显著统计学意义的提高[0.810(RA-DM)、0.823(RA-DBT)和 0.869(RA-DM + DBT),P ≤ 0.001;0.867(DL-DM)、0.871(DL-DBT)和 0.908(DL-DM + DBT),P = 0.001]。在仅使用 DM(0.867 vs 0.810,P = 0.001)、仅使用 DBT(0.871 vs 0.823,P = 0.001)和 DM + DBT(0.908 vs 0.869,P = 0.003)的实验中,深度学习模型优于放射组学模型。基于人工智能的方法,尤其是深度学习,可以帮助实现卓越的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AI-based strategies in breast mass ≤ 2 cm classification with mammography and tomosynthesis

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnosis performance of digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), DM combined DBT with AI-based strategies for breast mass ≤ 2 cm.

Materials and methods

DM and DBT images in 483 patients including 512 breast masses were acquired from November 2018 to November 2019. Malignant and benign tumours were determined by biopsies using histological analysis and follow-up within 24 months. The radiomics and deep learning methods were employed to extract the breast mass features in images and finally for benign and malignant classification. The DM, DBT and DM combined DBT (DM + DBT) images were fed into radiomics and deep learning models to construct corresponding models, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was employed to estimate model performance. An external dataset of 146 patients from March 2021 to December 2022 from another center was enrolled for external validation.

Results

In the internal testing dataset, compared with the DM model and the DBT model, the DM + DBT models based on radiomics and deep learning both showed statistically significant higher AUCs [0.810 (RA-DM), 0.823 (RA-DBT) and 0.869 (RA-DM + DBT), P ≤ 0.001; 0.867 (DL-DM), 0.871 (DL-DBT) and 0.908 (DL-DM + DBT), P = 0.001]. The deep learning models present superior to the radiomics models in the experiments with only DM (0.867 vs 0.810, P = 0.001), only DBT (0.871 vs 0.823, P = 0.001) and DM + DBT (0.908 vs 0.869, P = 0.003).

Conclusions

DBT has a clear additional value for diagnosing breast mass less than 2 cm compared with only DM. AI-based methods, especially deep learning, can help achieve excellent performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breast
Breast 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
165
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Breast is an international, multidisciplinary journal for researchers and clinicians, which focuses on translational and clinical research for the advancement of breast cancer prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all stages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信