中度和晚期早产儿 2 个月时的母乳喂养:群组随机对照试验 2 个月随访的启示

Amanda M. Moe , Meredith L. Brockway , Deborah A. McNeil , Arfan R. Afzal , Karen M. Benzies
{"title":"中度和晚期早产儿 2 个月时的母乳喂养:群组随机对照试验 2 个月随访的启示","authors":"Amanda M. Moe ,&nbsp;Meredith L. Brockway ,&nbsp;Deborah A. McNeil ,&nbsp;Arfan R. Afzal ,&nbsp;Karen M. Benzies","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Human milk (HM) is the optimal nutrition for infants; preterm infants demonstrate shorter HM feeding duration. Care interventions may increase HM feeding among preterm infants after NICU discharge. We compared Alberta Family Integrated Care (FICare) versus Standard Care on HM feeding in preterm infants at age 2 months.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a follow-up of a cluster randomized controlled trial of 455 infants and their mothers with data linked to the infant's 2-month public health visit. We used partial proportional odds to model group differences and factors associated with feeding type: exclusive HM (EHM), Non-EHM, or no HM (NHM).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared to Standard Care, mothers in Alberta FICare were less likely to provide EHM versus NHM. There was no group difference between EHM and Non-EHM. Mothers with higher education who were on maternity leave or employed were more likely to provide EHM. Infants who received EHM at discharge were more likely to continue at age 2 months. Higher maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy at discharge was associated with a greater likelihood of EHM.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Alberta FICare was not associated with EHM feeding at age 2 months.</div></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><div>Different factors predicted the three HM feeding categories, suggesting the need to individualize feeding supports.</div><div>Trial Registration.</div><div><span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> Identifier <span><span>NCT02879799</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, retrospectively registered August 26, 2016.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000931/pdfft?md5=9856878c44c9b3a7194c4938287306a6&pid=1-s2.0-S2772628224000931-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human milk feeding for moderate and late preterm infants at age 2 months: Insights from a cluster randomized controlled trial 2-month follow-up\",\"authors\":\"Amanda M. Moe ,&nbsp;Meredith L. Brockway ,&nbsp;Deborah A. McNeil ,&nbsp;Arfan R. Afzal ,&nbsp;Karen M. Benzies\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Human milk (HM) is the optimal nutrition for infants; preterm infants demonstrate shorter HM feeding duration. Care interventions may increase HM feeding among preterm infants after NICU discharge. We compared Alberta Family Integrated Care (FICare) versus Standard Care on HM feeding in preterm infants at age 2 months.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a follow-up of a cluster randomized controlled trial of 455 infants and their mothers with data linked to the infant's 2-month public health visit. We used partial proportional odds to model group differences and factors associated with feeding type: exclusive HM (EHM), Non-EHM, or no HM (NHM).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared to Standard Care, mothers in Alberta FICare were less likely to provide EHM versus NHM. There was no group difference between EHM and Non-EHM. Mothers with higher education who were on maternity leave or employed were more likely to provide EHM. Infants who received EHM at discharge were more likely to continue at age 2 months. Higher maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy at discharge was associated with a greater likelihood of EHM.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Alberta FICare was not associated with EHM feeding at age 2 months.</div></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><div>Different factors predicted the three HM feeding categories, suggesting the need to individualize feeding supports.</div><div>Trial Registration.</div><div><span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> Identifier <span><span>NCT02879799</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, retrospectively registered August 26, 2016.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PEC innovation\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000931/pdfft?md5=9856878c44c9b3a7194c4938287306a6&pid=1-s2.0-S2772628224000931-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PEC innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000931\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的人乳(HM)是婴儿的最佳营养;早产儿的人乳喂养持续时间较短。护理干预措施可增加早产儿在新生儿重症监护室出院后的人奶喂养。我们比较了艾伯塔省家庭综合护理(FICare)与标准护理对 2 个月大早产儿 HM 喂养的影响。方法我们对 455 名婴儿及其母亲进行了分组随机对照试验的随访,数据与婴儿 2 个月的公共健康检查相关联。结果与标准护理相比,艾伯塔省家庭护理中心的母亲不太可能提供纯母乳喂养(EHM)或无母乳喂养(NHM)。EHM和Non-EHM之间没有群体差异。受过高等教育、正在休产假或有工作的母亲更有可能提供超急诊护理。出院时接受超母乳喂养的婴儿更有可能在 2 个月大时继续母乳喂养。出院时母亲母乳喂养自我效能较高,与EHM的可能性较大相关。结论阿尔伯塔省家庭医疗保健计划与2个月大时的EHM喂养无关。创新不同的因素预测了三种HM喂养类别,表明需要个性化的喂养支持。Trial Registration.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02879799,2016年8月26日回顾性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human milk feeding for moderate and late preterm infants at age 2 months: Insights from a cluster randomized controlled trial 2-month follow-up

Objective

Human milk (HM) is the optimal nutrition for infants; preterm infants demonstrate shorter HM feeding duration. Care interventions may increase HM feeding among preterm infants after NICU discharge. We compared Alberta Family Integrated Care (FICare) versus Standard Care on HM feeding in preterm infants at age 2 months.

Methods

We conducted a follow-up of a cluster randomized controlled trial of 455 infants and their mothers with data linked to the infant's 2-month public health visit. We used partial proportional odds to model group differences and factors associated with feeding type: exclusive HM (EHM), Non-EHM, or no HM (NHM).

Results

Compared to Standard Care, mothers in Alberta FICare were less likely to provide EHM versus NHM. There was no group difference between EHM and Non-EHM. Mothers with higher education who were on maternity leave or employed were more likely to provide EHM. Infants who received EHM at discharge were more likely to continue at age 2 months. Higher maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy at discharge was associated with a greater likelihood of EHM.

Conclusion

Alberta FICare was not associated with EHM feeding at age 2 months.

Innovation

Different factors predicted the three HM feeding categories, suggesting the need to individualize feeding supports.
Trial Registration.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02879799, retrospectively registered August 26, 2016.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PEC innovation
PEC innovation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
147 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信