对有反食综合征风险的重症监护病房住院患者进行营养治疗:系统综述

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
{"title":"对有反食综合征风险的重症监护病房住院患者进行营养治疗:系统综述","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.nut.2024.112562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The profiles of intensive care cnit (ICU) critically ill inpatients differ from those of other hospitalized patients, since organ dysfunction is a factor that increases the risk for Refeeding Syndrome (RS) development. It is important to understand the influence of feeding methods and caloric intake on mortality and RS incidence among critically ill adult inpatients. A systematic search, following PRISMA guidelines and protocol for systematic reviews, was conducted for interventional and experimental studies analyzing RS occurrence in adults admitted to ICUs. Pubmed, Scielo, Lilacs, Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science were the databases searched, and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) tool was used to assess methodological quality of selected articles. Out of 945 abstracts screened, 32 articles were read in full and 20 were included for data extraction. Considerable heterogeneity was found between all studies reviewed. Enteral feeding was the most used method, and, in general, progression of caloric intake did not follow the American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) or National Institute of Health and Care (NICE) recommendations for RS. In majority, data collection period of studies was less than 7 days; RS was observed in up to 52.5% of patients, and related mortality varied between 15.6 and 83.3%. Due to weak level of evidence and high heterogeneity found within reviewed studies, it is not possible to determine a robust recommendation as to what would be the best and safest feeding method and caloric progression protocol for patients at risk for developing RS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19482,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nutritional therapy in intensive care unit inpatients at risk for refeeding syndrome: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nut.2024.112562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The profiles of intensive care cnit (ICU) critically ill inpatients differ from those of other hospitalized patients, since organ dysfunction is a factor that increases the risk for Refeeding Syndrome (RS) development. It is important to understand the influence of feeding methods and caloric intake on mortality and RS incidence among critically ill adult inpatients. A systematic search, following PRISMA guidelines and protocol for systematic reviews, was conducted for interventional and experimental studies analyzing RS occurrence in adults admitted to ICUs. Pubmed, Scielo, Lilacs, Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science were the databases searched, and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) tool was used to assess methodological quality of selected articles. Out of 945 abstracts screened, 32 articles were read in full and 20 were included for data extraction. Considerable heterogeneity was found between all studies reviewed. Enteral feeding was the most used method, and, in general, progression of caloric intake did not follow the American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) or National Institute of Health and Care (NICE) recommendations for RS. In majority, data collection period of studies was less than 7 days; RS was observed in up to 52.5% of patients, and related mortality varied between 15.6 and 83.3%. Due to weak level of evidence and high heterogeneity found within reviewed studies, it is not possible to determine a robust recommendation as to what would be the best and safest feeding method and caloric progression protocol for patients at risk for developing RS.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899900724002119\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899900724002119","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重症监护病房(ICU)重症住院病人的情况与其他住院病人不同,因为器官功能障碍是增加反哺综合征(RS)发生风险的一个因素。了解喂食方法和热量摄入对成年重症住院患者死亡率和返饲综合征发病率的影响非常重要。根据PRISMA指南和系统性综述协议,我们对分析重症监护病房成人RS发生率的干预性和实验性研究进行了系统性检索。检索的数据库包括 Pubmed、Scielo、Lilacs、Google Scholar、Scopus 和 Web of Science,并使用苏格兰校际指南网络 (SIGN) 工具评估所选文章的方法学质量。在筛选出的 945 篇摘要中,32 篇被全文阅读,20 篇被纳入数据提取。所审查的所有研究之间都存在相当大的异质性。肠内喂养是最常用的方法,一般来说,热量摄入的进展并不遵循美国肠外和肠内营养学会(ASPEN)或英国国家健康与护理研究所(NICE)对 RS 的建议。大多数研究的数据收集期不足 7 天;多达 52.5% 的患者观察到 RS,相关死亡率介于 15.6% 和 83.3% 之间。由于综述研究中的证据水平较弱且异质性较高,因此无法就有发生 RS 风险的患者的最佳和最安全喂养方法及热量递增方案确定可靠的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nutritional therapy in intensive care unit inpatients at risk for refeeding syndrome: A systematic review
The profiles of intensive care cnit (ICU) critically ill inpatients differ from those of other hospitalized patients, since organ dysfunction is a factor that increases the risk for Refeeding Syndrome (RS) development. It is important to understand the influence of feeding methods and caloric intake on mortality and RS incidence among critically ill adult inpatients. A systematic search, following PRISMA guidelines and protocol for systematic reviews, was conducted for interventional and experimental studies analyzing RS occurrence in adults admitted to ICUs. Pubmed, Scielo, Lilacs, Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science were the databases searched, and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) tool was used to assess methodological quality of selected articles. Out of 945 abstracts screened, 32 articles were read in full and 20 were included for data extraction. Considerable heterogeneity was found between all studies reviewed. Enteral feeding was the most used method, and, in general, progression of caloric intake did not follow the American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) or National Institute of Health and Care (NICE) recommendations for RS. In majority, data collection period of studies was less than 7 days; RS was observed in up to 52.5% of patients, and related mortality varied between 15.6 and 83.3%. Due to weak level of evidence and high heterogeneity found within reviewed studies, it is not possible to determine a robust recommendation as to what would be the best and safest feeding method and caloric progression protocol for patients at risk for developing RS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition
Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Nutrition has an open access mirror journal Nutrition: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Founded by Michael M. Meguid in the early 1980''s, Nutrition presents advances in nutrition research and science, informs its readers on new and advancing technologies and data in clinical nutrition practice, encourages the application of outcomes research and meta-analyses to problems in patient-related nutrition; and seeks to help clarify and set the research, policy and practice agenda for nutrition science to enhance human well-being in the years ahead.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信