Qingning Lin , Yuqing Jian , Deshuo Zhang , Jingdong Li , Shiping Mao
{"title":"探索数字经济对农业可持续发展的 \"双刃剑 \"效应:来自中国的证据","authors":"Qingning Lin , Yuqing Jian , Deshuo Zhang , Jingdong Li , Shiping Mao","doi":"10.1016/j.horiz.2024.100122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The prolonged reliance on excessive resource utilization and unsustainable production methods has resulted in significant environmental issues in China, posing serious challenges to the sustainable development of agriculture. While the digital economy offers new opportunities for enhancing agricultural sustainability, its rapid and unregulated growth could also lead to negative effects. Therefore, exploring the relationship between the digital economy and sustainable agriculture development (SAD), along with clarifying the mechanisms involved, is of paramount importance. This study uses the EBM-GML index to calculate AGTFP as a representation of SAD and empirically tests the impact and mechanism of the digital economy on SAD. Additionally, it explores the moderating role of government behavior, specifically Agricultural fiscal support and digital policies. The main findings are as follows: (1) During the observation period, SAD showed a steady upward trend, but regional disparities widened, forming a contiguous agglomeration pattern. The decentralization of the digital economy weakened, trending towards unipolarization and homogenization, with a north-to-south diffusion. (2) The impact of the digital economy on SAD presents an inverted \"U\" shape, indicating a \"double-edged sword\" effect. This relationship remains significant after robustness and endogeneity tests. Additionally, the digital economy exhibits significant spatial effects, maintaining an inverted U-shaped relationship with SAD in neighboring areas. (3) Regional heterogeneity shows that coastal provinces are in digital economy suppression or alert areas, while inland regions are in enhancement areas. During the study period, the number of suppression and alert areas did not significantly increase, but there was a trend of shifting from coastal to inland regions. (4) When below the threshold, the digital economy promotes agricultural green technology innovation, optimizes resource allocation, and fosters synergetic agglomeration of agriculture with the secondary and tertiary industries, enhancing SAD. However, surpassing the threshold negatively impacts these mechanisms. (5) Fiscal support for agriculture smooths the inverted \"U\" curve, mitigating the negative impact of excessive digital economy growth on SAD. Conversely, digital policies steepen the inverted \"U\" curve, exacerbating these negative effects. The findings highlight the need for balanced digital economic development to support sustainable agricultural growth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101199,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Horizons","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772737824000336/pdfft?md5=78c21312aba21546ee3ec63e56aea53e&pid=1-s2.0-S2772737824000336-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the \\\"Double-Edged Sword\\\" effect of the digital economy on sustainable agricultural development: Evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Qingning Lin , Yuqing Jian , Deshuo Zhang , Jingdong Li , Shiping Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.horiz.2024.100122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The prolonged reliance on excessive resource utilization and unsustainable production methods has resulted in significant environmental issues in China, posing serious challenges to the sustainable development of agriculture. While the digital economy offers new opportunities for enhancing agricultural sustainability, its rapid and unregulated growth could also lead to negative effects. Therefore, exploring the relationship between the digital economy and sustainable agriculture development (SAD), along with clarifying the mechanisms involved, is of paramount importance. This study uses the EBM-GML index to calculate AGTFP as a representation of SAD and empirically tests the impact and mechanism of the digital economy on SAD. Additionally, it explores the moderating role of government behavior, specifically Agricultural fiscal support and digital policies. The main findings are as follows: (1) During the observation period, SAD showed a steady upward trend, but regional disparities widened, forming a contiguous agglomeration pattern. The decentralization of the digital economy weakened, trending towards unipolarization and homogenization, with a north-to-south diffusion. (2) The impact of the digital economy on SAD presents an inverted \\\"U\\\" shape, indicating a \\\"double-edged sword\\\" effect. This relationship remains significant after robustness and endogeneity tests. Additionally, the digital economy exhibits significant spatial effects, maintaining an inverted U-shaped relationship with SAD in neighboring areas. (3) Regional heterogeneity shows that coastal provinces are in digital economy suppression or alert areas, while inland regions are in enhancement areas. During the study period, the number of suppression and alert areas did not significantly increase, but there was a trend of shifting from coastal to inland regions. (4) When below the threshold, the digital economy promotes agricultural green technology innovation, optimizes resource allocation, and fosters synergetic agglomeration of agriculture with the secondary and tertiary industries, enhancing SAD. However, surpassing the threshold negatively impacts these mechanisms. (5) Fiscal support for agriculture smooths the inverted \\\"U\\\" curve, mitigating the negative impact of excessive digital economy growth on SAD. Conversely, digital policies steepen the inverted \\\"U\\\" curve, exacerbating these negative effects. The findings highlight the need for balanced digital economic development to support sustainable agricultural growth.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Horizons\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772737824000336/pdfft?md5=78c21312aba21546ee3ec63e56aea53e&pid=1-s2.0-S2772737824000336-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Horizons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772737824000336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772737824000336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
长期依赖过度的资源利用和不可持续的生产方式,导致中国出现了严重的环境问题,给农业的可持续发展带来了严峻挑战。数字经济在为提高农业可持续发展提供新机遇的同时,其快速、无序的发展也可能带来负面影响。因此,探索数字经济与农业可持续发展(SAD)之间的关系,并阐明其中的机制至关重要。本研究使用 EBM-GML 指数计算 AGTFP,作为 SAD 的代表,并实证检验了数字经济对 SAD 的影响和机制。此外,研究还探讨了政府行为的调节作用,特别是农业财政支持和数字政策。主要结论如下(1)在观察期内,SAD呈稳步上升趋势,但地区差距扩大,形成连片集聚格局。数字经济的分散性减弱,趋向于单极化和同质化,由北向南扩散。(2)数字经济对 SAD 的影响呈现倒 "U "型,显示出 "双刃剑 "效应。经过稳健性检验和内生性检验后,这一关系仍然显著。此外,数字经济还表现出显著的空间效应,与邻近地区的 SAD 保持倒 "U "型关系。(3)区域异质性表明,沿海省份处于数字经济抑制区或警戒区,而内陆地区则处于提升区。在研究期间,抑制区和警戒区的数量没有明显增加,但有从沿海地区向内陆地区转移的趋势。(4)当低于阈值时,数字经济促进农业绿色技术创新,优化资源配置,促进农业与二、三产业的协同集聚,提升 SAD。然而,超过阈值则会对这些机制产生负面影响。(5) 对农业的财政支持平滑了倒 "U "曲线,减轻了数字经济过度增长对 SAD 的负面影响。反之,数字政策则会使倒 "U "曲线变陡,加剧这些负面影响。研究结果凸显了平衡数字经济发展以支持可持续农业增长的必要性。
Exploring the "Double-Edged Sword" effect of the digital economy on sustainable agricultural development: Evidence from China
The prolonged reliance on excessive resource utilization and unsustainable production methods has resulted in significant environmental issues in China, posing serious challenges to the sustainable development of agriculture. While the digital economy offers new opportunities for enhancing agricultural sustainability, its rapid and unregulated growth could also lead to negative effects. Therefore, exploring the relationship between the digital economy and sustainable agriculture development (SAD), along with clarifying the mechanisms involved, is of paramount importance. This study uses the EBM-GML index to calculate AGTFP as a representation of SAD and empirically tests the impact and mechanism of the digital economy on SAD. Additionally, it explores the moderating role of government behavior, specifically Agricultural fiscal support and digital policies. The main findings are as follows: (1) During the observation period, SAD showed a steady upward trend, but regional disparities widened, forming a contiguous agglomeration pattern. The decentralization of the digital economy weakened, trending towards unipolarization and homogenization, with a north-to-south diffusion. (2) The impact of the digital economy on SAD presents an inverted "U" shape, indicating a "double-edged sword" effect. This relationship remains significant after robustness and endogeneity tests. Additionally, the digital economy exhibits significant spatial effects, maintaining an inverted U-shaped relationship with SAD in neighboring areas. (3) Regional heterogeneity shows that coastal provinces are in digital economy suppression or alert areas, while inland regions are in enhancement areas. During the study period, the number of suppression and alert areas did not significantly increase, but there was a trend of shifting from coastal to inland regions. (4) When below the threshold, the digital economy promotes agricultural green technology innovation, optimizes resource allocation, and fosters synergetic agglomeration of agriculture with the secondary and tertiary industries, enhancing SAD. However, surpassing the threshold negatively impacts these mechanisms. (5) Fiscal support for agriculture smooths the inverted "U" curve, mitigating the negative impact of excessive digital economy growth on SAD. Conversely, digital policies steepen the inverted "U" curve, exacerbating these negative effects. The findings highlight the need for balanced digital economic development to support sustainable agricultural growth.