{"title":"探索自我报告是否适合深入了解教师的技术教学知识","authors":"Franziska Baier-Mosch , Lukas Schulze-Vorberg , Holger Horz , Mareike Kunter","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Teachers need high technological pedagogical knowledge (TPK) to integrate digital technology effectively into their teaching. The valid assessment of teachers’ TPK is important so that researchers can investigate its development and impact on student outcomes. However, providing validity evidence for frequently used TPK self-report scales is challenging. Previous studies have indicated only weak correlations between these scales and tests. It remains open whether low correlations are due to method-specific biases of the self-reports or the fact that self-reports and tests measure different constructs (generalized knowledge/self-efficacy vs. specific knowledge). We investigated the relationship between self-report scales and tests of two aspects of teachers’ TPK – TPK-teaching and learning and TPK-classroom management – in a sample of 238 in-service teachers. Results showed that the TPK self-report scales seemed to measure a different construct (more generalized knowledge) than the tests and that low correlations cannot simply be explained by self-report method-specific biases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 101402"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24000816/pdfft?md5=0f3bcb8e4fcb832eb5f927ad6c20eb5e&pid=1-s2.0-S0191491X24000816-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the suitability of self-reports to gain insights into teachers’ technological pedagogical knowledge\",\"authors\":\"Franziska Baier-Mosch , Lukas Schulze-Vorberg , Holger Horz , Mareike Kunter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Teachers need high technological pedagogical knowledge (TPK) to integrate digital technology effectively into their teaching. The valid assessment of teachers’ TPK is important so that researchers can investigate its development and impact on student outcomes. However, providing validity evidence for frequently used TPK self-report scales is challenging. Previous studies have indicated only weak correlations between these scales and tests. It remains open whether low correlations are due to method-specific biases of the self-reports or the fact that self-reports and tests measure different constructs (generalized knowledge/self-efficacy vs. specific knowledge). We investigated the relationship between self-report scales and tests of two aspects of teachers’ TPK – TPK-teaching and learning and TPK-classroom management – in a sample of 238 in-service teachers. Results showed that the TPK self-report scales seemed to measure a different construct (more generalized knowledge) than the tests and that low correlations cannot simply be explained by self-report method-specific biases.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24000816/pdfft?md5=0f3bcb8e4fcb832eb5f927ad6c20eb5e&pid=1-s2.0-S0191491X24000816-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24000816\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24000816","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the suitability of self-reports to gain insights into teachers’ technological pedagogical knowledge
Teachers need high technological pedagogical knowledge (TPK) to integrate digital technology effectively into their teaching. The valid assessment of teachers’ TPK is important so that researchers can investigate its development and impact on student outcomes. However, providing validity evidence for frequently used TPK self-report scales is challenging. Previous studies have indicated only weak correlations between these scales and tests. It remains open whether low correlations are due to method-specific biases of the self-reports or the fact that self-reports and tests measure different constructs (generalized knowledge/self-efficacy vs. specific knowledge). We investigated the relationship between self-report scales and tests of two aspects of teachers’ TPK – TPK-teaching and learning and TPK-classroom management – in a sample of 238 in-service teachers. Results showed that the TPK self-report scales seemed to measure a different construct (more generalized knowledge) than the tests and that low correlations cannot simply be explained by self-report method-specific biases.
期刊介绍:
Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.