使用无监督机器学习算法进行异常检测:模拟研究

IF 2.7 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
{"title":"使用无监督机器学习算法进行异常检测:模拟研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of five prominent unsupervised machine learning anomaly detection algorithms: One-Class Support Vector Machine (One-Class SVM), One-Class SVM with Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Isolation Forest (iForest), Local Outlier Factor (LOF), and Robust Covariance (Elliptic Envelope). Through systematic analysis on a synthetically simulated dataset, the study assessed each algorithm’s predictive performance using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score specifically for outlier detection. The evaluation reveals that One-Class SVM, Isolation Forest, and Robust Covariance are more effective in identifying outliers in the synthetic simulated dataset, with Isolation Forest slightly outperforming the other algorithms in terms of balancing precision and recall. One-Class SVM with SGD shows promise in precision but needs adjustment to improve recall. Local Outlier Factor may require parameter tuning or may not be as suitable for this particular dataset’s characteristics. The findings reveal significant variations in performance, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each method in identifying anomalies. This research contributes to the field of machine learning by demonstrating that the selection of an anomaly detection algorithm should be a considered decision, taking into account the specific characteristics of the data and the operational context of its application. Future work should explore parameter optimization, the impact of dataset characteristics on model performance, and the application of these models to real-world datasets to validate their efficacy in practical anomaly detection scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21690,"journal":{"name":"Scientific African","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227624003284/pdfft?md5=d89c3cb9a30070e40ceab3ad79af22ab&pid=1-s2.0-S2468227624003284-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anomaly detection using unsupervised machine learning algorithms: A simulation study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of five prominent unsupervised machine learning anomaly detection algorithms: One-Class Support Vector Machine (One-Class SVM), One-Class SVM with Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Isolation Forest (iForest), Local Outlier Factor (LOF), and Robust Covariance (Elliptic Envelope). Through systematic analysis on a synthetically simulated dataset, the study assessed each algorithm’s predictive performance using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score specifically for outlier detection. The evaluation reveals that One-Class SVM, Isolation Forest, and Robust Covariance are more effective in identifying outliers in the synthetic simulated dataset, with Isolation Forest slightly outperforming the other algorithms in terms of balancing precision and recall. One-Class SVM with SGD shows promise in precision but needs adjustment to improve recall. Local Outlier Factor may require parameter tuning or may not be as suitable for this particular dataset’s characteristics. The findings reveal significant variations in performance, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each method in identifying anomalies. This research contributes to the field of machine learning by demonstrating that the selection of an anomaly detection algorithm should be a considered decision, taking into account the specific characteristics of the data and the operational context of its application. Future work should explore parameter optimization, the impact of dataset characteristics on model performance, and the application of these models to real-world datasets to validate their efficacy in practical anomaly detection scenarios.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific African\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227624003284/pdfft?md5=d89c3cb9a30070e40ceab3ad79af22ab&pid=1-s2.0-S2468227624003284-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific African\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227624003284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific African","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227624003284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对五种著名的无监督机器学习异常检测算法进行了综合评估:单类支持向量机(One-Class SVM)、随机梯度下降单类支持向量机(One-Class SVM with Stochastic Gradient Descent,SGD)、隔离森林(Isolation Forest,iForest)、局部离群因子(Local Outlier Factor,LOF)和鲁棒性协方差(Robust Covariance,Elliptic Envelope)。通过对合成模拟数据集进行系统分析,该研究使用准确度、精确度、召回率和 F1 分数评估了每种算法的预测性能,特别是在离群点检测方面。评估结果表明,One-Class SVM、Isolation Forest 和 Robust Covariance 在识别合成模拟数据集中的离群值方面更为有效,其中 Isolation Forest 在平衡精度和召回率方面略优于其他算法。带有 SGD 的单类 SVM 在精确度方面表现出色,但需要进行调整以提高召回率。本地离群因子可能需要调整参数,或者可能不适合这一特定数据集的特点。研究结果揭示了性能上的显著差异,突出了每种方法在识别异常方面的优势和局限性。这项研究表明,异常检测算法的选择应该是一个深思熟虑的决定,要考虑到数据的具体特征及其应用的操作环境,从而为机器学习领域做出贡献。未来的工作应探索参数优化、数据集特征对模型性能的影响,以及将这些模型应用于真实世界的数据集,以验证它们在实际异常检测场景中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anomaly detection using unsupervised machine learning algorithms: A simulation study
This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of five prominent unsupervised machine learning anomaly detection algorithms: One-Class Support Vector Machine (One-Class SVM), One-Class SVM with Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Isolation Forest (iForest), Local Outlier Factor (LOF), and Robust Covariance (Elliptic Envelope). Through systematic analysis on a synthetically simulated dataset, the study assessed each algorithm’s predictive performance using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score specifically for outlier detection. The evaluation reveals that One-Class SVM, Isolation Forest, and Robust Covariance are more effective in identifying outliers in the synthetic simulated dataset, with Isolation Forest slightly outperforming the other algorithms in terms of balancing precision and recall. One-Class SVM with SGD shows promise in precision but needs adjustment to improve recall. Local Outlier Factor may require parameter tuning or may not be as suitable for this particular dataset’s characteristics. The findings reveal significant variations in performance, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each method in identifying anomalies. This research contributes to the field of machine learning by demonstrating that the selection of an anomaly detection algorithm should be a considered decision, taking into account the specific characteristics of the data and the operational context of its application. Future work should explore parameter optimization, the impact of dataset characteristics on model performance, and the application of these models to real-world datasets to validate their efficacy in practical anomaly detection scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific African
Scientific African Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信