单手操作中的肩背姿势评估:扩展人体工程学伸手指南,考虑腰椎轴向扭转。

Jessa M Davidson, Colin D McKinnon, Clark R Dickerson, Jack P Callaghan
{"title":"单手操作中的肩背姿势评估:扩展人体工程学伸手指南,考虑腰椎轴向扭转。","authors":"Jessa M Davidson, Colin D McKinnon, Clark R Dickerson, Jack P Callaghan","doi":"10.1080/24725838.2024.2402690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Occupational applicationsAcross a series of standing single-handed exertions performed at different lateral angles, distances, heights, and loads, lumbar axial twist exceeded an angular threshold of 9° in select exertions. Specifically, 9° of rightward axial twist was exceeded for all exertions performed laterally (90° from the body midline). Additionally, for those at the body midline, 9° of leftward axial twist was exceeded for upward exertions and exertions performed at far distances (tertiary reach envelope). Further, the data supports that for many exertions, lumbar flexion-extension and shoulder elevation would be unlikely to increase the potential for injury as angles remained within the <i>in vivo</i> lumbar neutral zone and were not considered overhead. Given the relationship between lateral hand exertions and lumbar axial twist, it is generally recommended that standing single-handed exertions not be performed beyond 60° from the midline. In addition to the current recommendations related to reach distance, future ergonomic reach envelope guidelines could benefit from incorporating recommendations on reach angle from the body midline.</p>","PeriodicalId":73332,"journal":{"name":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","volume":" ","pages":"189-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Assessment of Back and Shoulder Postures in Single-Handed Exertions: Expanding Ergonomic Reaching Guidelines to Consider Lumbar Spine Axial Twist.\",\"authors\":\"Jessa M Davidson, Colin D McKinnon, Clark R Dickerson, Jack P Callaghan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24725838.2024.2402690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Occupational applicationsAcross a series of standing single-handed exertions performed at different lateral angles, distances, heights, and loads, lumbar axial twist exceeded an angular threshold of 9° in select exertions. Specifically, 9° of rightward axial twist was exceeded for all exertions performed laterally (90° from the body midline). Additionally, for those at the body midline, 9° of leftward axial twist was exceeded for upward exertions and exertions performed at far distances (tertiary reach envelope). Further, the data supports that for many exertions, lumbar flexion-extension and shoulder elevation would be unlikely to increase the potential for injury as angles remained within the <i>in vivo</i> lumbar neutral zone and were not considered overhead. Given the relationship between lateral hand exertions and lumbar axial twist, it is generally recommended that standing single-handed exertions not be performed beyond 60° from the midline. In addition to the current recommendations related to reach distance, future ergonomic reach envelope guidelines could benefit from incorporating recommendations on reach angle from the body midline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"189-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2024.2402690\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2024.2402690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

职业应用在一系列以不同侧向角度、距离、高度和负荷进行的单手站立用力动作中,腰部轴向扭转在某些动作中超过了 9° 的角度阈值。具体来说,所有横向(与身体中线成 90°)用力时,右侧轴向扭转都超过了 9°。此外,在身体中线处,向上用力和远距离用力(三级伸展包络)时,轴向左扭转超过了 9°。此外,数据还证明,在许多用力动作中,腰部屈伸和肩部抬高不太可能增加受伤的可能性,因为角度仍在体内腰部中立区范围内,且不被视为高举。鉴于侧手用力与腰椎轴向扭转之间的关系,一般建议站立时单手用力不要超过中线 60°。除了目前与伸手距离相关的建议外,未来的人体工程学伸手包络线指南还可以纳入从身体中线开始的伸手角度建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Assessment of Back and Shoulder Postures in Single-Handed Exertions: Expanding Ergonomic Reaching Guidelines to Consider Lumbar Spine Axial Twist.

Occupational applicationsAcross a series of standing single-handed exertions performed at different lateral angles, distances, heights, and loads, lumbar axial twist exceeded an angular threshold of 9° in select exertions. Specifically, 9° of rightward axial twist was exceeded for all exertions performed laterally (90° from the body midline). Additionally, for those at the body midline, 9° of leftward axial twist was exceeded for upward exertions and exertions performed at far distances (tertiary reach envelope). Further, the data supports that for many exertions, lumbar flexion-extension and shoulder elevation would be unlikely to increase the potential for injury as angles remained within the in vivo lumbar neutral zone and were not considered overhead. Given the relationship between lateral hand exertions and lumbar axial twist, it is generally recommended that standing single-handed exertions not be performed beyond 60° from the midline. In addition to the current recommendations related to reach distance, future ergonomic reach envelope guidelines could benefit from incorporating recommendations on reach angle from the body midline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信