[骶旁动脉穿孔器皮瓣在蝶窦疾病治疗中的临床应用]。

Q3 Medicine
J H Lan, Z H Chen, Y Y Fan, L Han, T Wang, C Y Jia, W L He
{"title":"[骶旁动脉穿孔器皮瓣在蝶窦疾病治疗中的临床应用]。","authors":"J H Lan, Z H Chen, Y Y Fan, L Han, T Wang, C Y Jia, W L He","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231017-00137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate clinical efficacy of parasacral perforator flap (PPF) on postoperative wound healing in pilonidal sinus diseases (PSDs). <b>Methods:</b> The surgery steps were as follows: (1) To preoperatively detect parasacral perforator arteries with the handhold Doppler probe and mark them; (2) To remove the infected and necrotic tissues of PSDs completely; (3) To design the PPF according to the wound size and the parasacral perforator arteries' localization; (4) To harvest the flap from the gluteus maximus muscle surface and transfer it to the wound without tension. Several data were documented, including surgical duration, flap length, flap width, drainage tube placement duration, hospital stay, duration from operation to stitch removal, postsurgical complications and recurrence. <b>Results:</b> There were six patients with PSDs whose postoperative wound healing was repaired by PPF, admitted in our department from March 2021 to March 2023. Of them, five were male and one was female. Their median age was 24 (range: 18-33) years old. Their median surgical duration was 165 (range: 134-207) minutes, median length of PPF was 8 (range: 7-11) cm, median width of PPF was 3 (range: 3-4) cm, mean duration of drainage tube placement was 8 (range: 4-17) days, mean hospital stay was 13 (range: 6-23) days, mean duration from operation to stitch removal was 14 (range: 14-17) days, median follow-up time was 6-16 months. Incisions of all six cases achieved first-intention healing without early- or late-stage complications. No recurrence occurred during follow-up. All patients involved were satisfied with their clinical efficacy. <b>Conclusion:</b> The utility of PPF in postoperative wound healing of PPDs was effective, safe and reliable.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 9","pages":"970-973"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Clinical application of parasacral artery perforator flap in the treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Diseases].\",\"authors\":\"J H Lan, Z H Chen, Y Y Fan, L Han, T Wang, C Y Jia, W L He\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231017-00137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate clinical efficacy of parasacral perforator flap (PPF) on postoperative wound healing in pilonidal sinus diseases (PSDs). <b>Methods:</b> The surgery steps were as follows: (1) To preoperatively detect parasacral perforator arteries with the handhold Doppler probe and mark them; (2) To remove the infected and necrotic tissues of PSDs completely; (3) To design the PPF according to the wound size and the parasacral perforator arteries' localization; (4) To harvest the flap from the gluteus maximus muscle surface and transfer it to the wound without tension. Several data were documented, including surgical duration, flap length, flap width, drainage tube placement duration, hospital stay, duration from operation to stitch removal, postsurgical complications and recurrence. <b>Results:</b> There were six patients with PSDs whose postoperative wound healing was repaired by PPF, admitted in our department from March 2021 to March 2023. Of them, five were male and one was female. Their median age was 24 (range: 18-33) years old. Their median surgical duration was 165 (range: 134-207) minutes, median length of PPF was 8 (range: 7-11) cm, median width of PPF was 3 (range: 3-4) cm, mean duration of drainage tube placement was 8 (range: 4-17) days, mean hospital stay was 13 (range: 6-23) days, mean duration from operation to stitch removal was 14 (range: 14-17) days, median follow-up time was 6-16 months. Incisions of all six cases achieved first-intention healing without early- or late-stage complications. No recurrence occurred during follow-up. All patients involved were satisfied with their clinical efficacy. <b>Conclusion:</b> The utility of PPF in postoperative wound healing of PPDs was effective, safe and reliable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华胃肠外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"27 9\",\"pages\":\"970-973\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华胃肠外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231017-00137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华胃肠外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231017-00137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究骶骨旁穿孔器皮瓣(PPF)对朝天鼻窦疾病(PSD)术后伤口愈合的临床疗效。手术方法手术步骤如下:(1)术前用手持式多普勒探头检测骶骨旁穿孔动脉并标记;(2)彻底清除PSD感染和坏死组织;(3)根据创面大小和骶骨旁穿孔动脉定位设计PPF;(4)从臀大肌表面采集皮瓣并无张力转移至创面。记录了多项数据,包括手术时间、皮瓣长度、皮瓣宽度、引流管放置时间、住院时间、从手术到拆线的时间、术后并发症和复发情况。结果:2021 年 3 月至 2023 年 3 月期间,我科共收治了 6 名 PSD 患者,他们术后的伤口愈合都是通过 PPF 修复的。其中五名男性,一名女性。他们的中位年龄为 24 岁(18-33 岁)。手术时间中位数为 165 分钟(范围:134-207 分钟),PPF 长度中位数为 8 厘米(范围:7-11 厘米),PPF 宽度中位数为 3 厘米(范围:3-4 厘米),放置引流管的平均时间为 8 天(范围:4-17 天),平均住院时间为 13 天(范围:6-23 天),从手术到拆线的平均时间为 14 天(范围:14-17 天),随访时间中位数为 6-16 个月。所有六个病例的切口都达到了初愈效果,没有出现早期或晚期并发症。随访期间无复发。所有患者都对其临床疗效表示满意。结论PPF 在 PPD 术后伤口愈合中的应用是有效、安全和可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Clinical application of parasacral artery perforator flap in the treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Diseases].

Objective: To investigate clinical efficacy of parasacral perforator flap (PPF) on postoperative wound healing in pilonidal sinus diseases (PSDs). Methods: The surgery steps were as follows: (1) To preoperatively detect parasacral perforator arteries with the handhold Doppler probe and mark them; (2) To remove the infected and necrotic tissues of PSDs completely; (3) To design the PPF according to the wound size and the parasacral perforator arteries' localization; (4) To harvest the flap from the gluteus maximus muscle surface and transfer it to the wound without tension. Several data were documented, including surgical duration, flap length, flap width, drainage tube placement duration, hospital stay, duration from operation to stitch removal, postsurgical complications and recurrence. Results: There were six patients with PSDs whose postoperative wound healing was repaired by PPF, admitted in our department from March 2021 to March 2023. Of them, five were male and one was female. Their median age was 24 (range: 18-33) years old. Their median surgical duration was 165 (range: 134-207) minutes, median length of PPF was 8 (range: 7-11) cm, median width of PPF was 3 (range: 3-4) cm, mean duration of drainage tube placement was 8 (range: 4-17) days, mean hospital stay was 13 (range: 6-23) days, mean duration from operation to stitch removal was 14 (range: 14-17) days, median follow-up time was 6-16 months. Incisions of all six cases achieved first-intention healing without early- or late-stage complications. No recurrence occurred during follow-up. All patients involved were satisfied with their clinical efficacy. Conclusion: The utility of PPF in postoperative wound healing of PPDs was effective, safe and reliable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华胃肠外科杂志
中华胃肠外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6776
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信