利用磁共振成像检测前列腺癌的差异:基于人群的研究。

IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Christiane J El Khoury, Stephen J Freedland, Krupa Gandhi, Scott W Keith, Nikita Nikita, Amy Shaver, Swapnil Sharma, Wm Kevin Kelly, Grace Lu-Yao
{"title":"利用磁共振成像检测前列腺癌的差异:基于人群的研究。","authors":"Christiane J El Khoury, Stephen J Freedland, Krupa Gandhi, Scott W Keith, Nikita Nikita, Amy Shaver, Swapnil Sharma, Wm Kevin Kelly, Grace Lu-Yao","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Racial disparities exist in prostate cancer (PCa) care and outcomes. Ultrasound-guided biopsy may miss a significant portion of clinically significant PCa while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improves its detection. This study aims to investigate demographic and SES factors influencing MRI utilization for PCa detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SEER-Medicare data were used to assess use of pre-diagnostic MRI in 90,908 patients diagnosed with primary PCa (2012-2019). Modified Poisson regression models adjusted for socioeconomic factors such as income, education, Medicare buy-in and dual eligibility were used to examine factors associated with MRI use. All statistical tests were two-sided.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-diagnostic MRI utilization increased substantially between 2012 (3.8%) and 2019 (32.6%). The disparity in utilization between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White patients decreased by more than half from 43% (RR = 0.57, 95%CI = 0.48-0.67) in 2012 to 20% (RR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.74-0.86) in 2019. Rural residents were 35% less likely (RR = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.61-0.69) to undergo MRI, while those in the Central US (vs West) were 49% less likely (RR = 0.49, 95%CI = 0.48-0.51). No significant disparities in MRI use were identified between ages ≥75 and 64-75. SES factors associated with MRI were income, education, Medicare buy-in and dual eligibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed increased MRI utilization over time including among those 75 and older. Racial disparities decreased, while wide urban/rural disparities remained. Targeted public health interventions should focus on geographical factors, as \"urban/rural designations\" and \"US region\" were associated with the most prominent disparities. Future research should explore pathways contributing to these disparities, using a multidisciplinary approach, including geographical studies, to help eliminate healthcare inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":14809,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in the Utilization of MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Population-Based Study.\",\"authors\":\"Christiane J El Khoury, Stephen J Freedland, Krupa Gandhi, Scott W Keith, Nikita Nikita, Amy Shaver, Swapnil Sharma, Wm Kevin Kelly, Grace Lu-Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jnci/djae234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Racial disparities exist in prostate cancer (PCa) care and outcomes. Ultrasound-guided biopsy may miss a significant portion of clinically significant PCa while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improves its detection. This study aims to investigate demographic and SES factors influencing MRI utilization for PCa detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SEER-Medicare data were used to assess use of pre-diagnostic MRI in 90,908 patients diagnosed with primary PCa (2012-2019). Modified Poisson regression models adjusted for socioeconomic factors such as income, education, Medicare buy-in and dual eligibility were used to examine factors associated with MRI use. All statistical tests were two-sided.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-diagnostic MRI utilization increased substantially between 2012 (3.8%) and 2019 (32.6%). The disparity in utilization between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White patients decreased by more than half from 43% (RR = 0.57, 95%CI = 0.48-0.67) in 2012 to 20% (RR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.74-0.86) in 2019. Rural residents were 35% less likely (RR = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.61-0.69) to undergo MRI, while those in the Central US (vs West) were 49% less likely (RR = 0.49, 95%CI = 0.48-0.51). No significant disparities in MRI use were identified between ages ≥75 and 64-75. SES factors associated with MRI were income, education, Medicare buy-in and dual eligibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed increased MRI utilization over time including among those 75 and older. Racial disparities decreased, while wide urban/rural disparities remained. Targeted public health interventions should focus on geographical factors, as \\\"urban/rural designations\\\" and \\\"US region\\\" were associated with the most prominent disparities. Future research should explore pathways contributing to these disparities, using a multidisciplinary approach, including geographical studies, to help eliminate healthcare inequities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae234\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae234","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前列腺癌(PCa)的治疗和结果存在种族差异。超声引导下的活检可能会漏检相当一部分有临床意义的 PCa,而磁共振成像(MRI)则能提高 PCa 的检测率。本研究旨在调查影响 PCa 检测中磁共振成像利用率的人口统计学和社会经济地位因素:方法:使用 SEER-Medicare 数据评估 90908 名确诊为原发性 PCa 患者(2012-2019 年)诊断前 MRI 的使用情况。使用经调整的社会经济因素(如收入、教育、医疗保险购买和双重资格)的修正泊松回归模型来研究与 MRI 使用相关的因素。所有统计检验均为双侧检验:2012年(3.8%)至2019年(32.6%)期间,诊断前核磁共振成像的使用率大幅上升。非西班牙裔黑人和非西班牙裔白人患者之间的使用率差距缩小了一半以上,从2012年的43%(RR = 0.57,95%CI = 0.48-0.67)下降到2019年的20%(RR = 0.80,95%CI = 0.74-0.86)。农村居民接受核磁共振成像的可能性降低了 35%(RR = 0.65,95%CI = 0.61-0.69),而美国中部(与西部相比)居民接受核磁共振成像的可能性降低了 49%(RR = 0.49,95%CI = 0.48-0.51)。在年龄≥75岁和64-75岁之间,核磁共振成像的使用率没有发现明显差异。与核磁共振成像相关的社会经济因素包括收入、教育、医疗保险购买和双重资格:这项研究表明,随着时间的推移,包括 75 岁及以上人群在内,磁共振成像的使用率在不断增加。种族差异有所缩小,但城乡差异仍然很大。有针对性的公共卫生干预措施应侧重于地理因素,因为 "城市/农村指定 "和 "美国地区 "与最突出的差异有关。未来的研究应采用包括地理研究在内的多学科方法,探索造成这些差异的途径,以帮助消除医疗保健不公平现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities in the Utilization of MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Population-Based Study.

Background: Racial disparities exist in prostate cancer (PCa) care and outcomes. Ultrasound-guided biopsy may miss a significant portion of clinically significant PCa while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improves its detection. This study aims to investigate demographic and SES factors influencing MRI utilization for PCa detection.

Methods: SEER-Medicare data were used to assess use of pre-diagnostic MRI in 90,908 patients diagnosed with primary PCa (2012-2019). Modified Poisson regression models adjusted for socioeconomic factors such as income, education, Medicare buy-in and dual eligibility were used to examine factors associated with MRI use. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: Pre-diagnostic MRI utilization increased substantially between 2012 (3.8%) and 2019 (32.6%). The disparity in utilization between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White patients decreased by more than half from 43% (RR = 0.57, 95%CI = 0.48-0.67) in 2012 to 20% (RR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.74-0.86) in 2019. Rural residents were 35% less likely (RR = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.61-0.69) to undergo MRI, while those in the Central US (vs West) were 49% less likely (RR = 0.49, 95%CI = 0.48-0.51). No significant disparities in MRI use were identified between ages ≥75 and 64-75. SES factors associated with MRI were income, education, Medicare buy-in and dual eligibility.

Conclusions: This study revealed increased MRI utilization over time including among those 75 and older. Racial disparities decreased, while wide urban/rural disparities remained. Targeted public health interventions should focus on geographical factors, as "urban/rural designations" and "US region" were associated with the most prominent disparities. Future research should explore pathways contributing to these disparities, using a multidisciplinary approach, including geographical studies, to help eliminate healthcare inequities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
203
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the National Cancer Institute is a reputable publication that undergoes a peer-review process. It is available in both print (ISSN: 0027-8874) and online (ISSN: 1460-2105) formats, with 12 issues released annually. The journal's primary aim is to disseminate innovative and important discoveries in the field of cancer research, with specific emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, behavioral, and health outcomes studies. Authors are encouraged to submit reviews, minireviews, and commentaries. The journal ensures that submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous and expedited review to publish scientifically and medically significant findings in a timely manner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信