"医疗建议前 "离开医院与随后的吸毒过量:一项基于人群的队列研究。

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mayesha Khan, Xiao Nicole, Alexis Crabtree, Jessica Moe, Trudy Nasmith, Daniel Daly-Grafstein, Jeffrey R Brubacher, Amanda K Slaunwhite, John A Staples
{"title":"\"医疗建议前 \"离开医院与随后的吸毒过量:一项基于人群的队列研究。","authors":"Mayesha Khan, Xiao Nicole, Alexis Crabtree, Jessica Moe, Trudy Nasmith, Daniel Daly-Grafstein, Jeffrey R Brubacher, Amanda K Slaunwhite, John A Staples","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.240364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A substantial number of hospital admissions end in patient-initiated departure before medical treatment is complete. Whether \"before medically advised\" (BMA) discharge increases the risk of subsequent drug overdose remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study using administrative health data from a 20% random sample of residents of British Columbia, Canada. We focused on nonelective, nonobstetric hospital stays occurring between 2015 and 2019. We used survival analysis to compare the rate of fatal or nonfatal illicit drug overdose in the first 30 days after BMA discharge versus the rate after physician-advised discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 6440 of 189 808 (3.4%) hospital stays ended in BMA discharge. Among 820 overdoses occurring in the first 30 days after any hospital discharge, 755 (92%) involved patients with a history of substance use disorder. Unadjusted overdose rates were 10-fold higher after BMA discharge than after physician-advised discharge, and BMA discharge was associated with subsequent overdose even after adjustment for potential confounders (crude incidence, 2.8% v. 0.3%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-1.89). Before medically advised discharge was associated with increases in subsequent emergency department visits (adjusted HR 1.92; 95% CI 1.83-2.02) and unplanned hospital readmissions (adjusted HR 2.07; 95% CI 1.96-2.19), but there was no significant association with the uncommon outcomes of fatal overdose and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Before medically advised departure is associated with an increased risk of drug overdose in the first 30 days after discharge. Improved treatment of substance use disorder, expanded access to overdose prevention services, and new means of postdeparture outreach should be explored to reduce this risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":9609,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Medical Association journal","volume":"196 31","pages":"E1066-E1075"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Before medically advised\\\" departure from hospital and subsequent drug overdose: a population-based cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Mayesha Khan, Xiao Nicole, Alexis Crabtree, Jessica Moe, Trudy Nasmith, Daniel Daly-Grafstein, Jeffrey R Brubacher, Amanda K Slaunwhite, John A Staples\",\"doi\":\"10.1503/cmaj.240364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A substantial number of hospital admissions end in patient-initiated departure before medical treatment is complete. Whether \\\"before medically advised\\\" (BMA) discharge increases the risk of subsequent drug overdose remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study using administrative health data from a 20% random sample of residents of British Columbia, Canada. We focused on nonelective, nonobstetric hospital stays occurring between 2015 and 2019. We used survival analysis to compare the rate of fatal or nonfatal illicit drug overdose in the first 30 days after BMA discharge versus the rate after physician-advised discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 6440 of 189 808 (3.4%) hospital stays ended in BMA discharge. Among 820 overdoses occurring in the first 30 days after any hospital discharge, 755 (92%) involved patients with a history of substance use disorder. Unadjusted overdose rates were 10-fold higher after BMA discharge than after physician-advised discharge, and BMA discharge was associated with subsequent overdose even after adjustment for potential confounders (crude incidence, 2.8% v. 0.3%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-1.89). Before medically advised discharge was associated with increases in subsequent emergency department visits (adjusted HR 1.92; 95% CI 1.83-2.02) and unplanned hospital readmissions (adjusted HR 2.07; 95% CI 1.96-2.19), but there was no significant association with the uncommon outcomes of fatal overdose and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Before medically advised departure is associated with an increased risk of drug overdose in the first 30 days after discharge. Improved treatment of substance use disorder, expanded access to overdose prevention services, and new means of postdeparture outreach should be explored to reduce this risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Medical Association journal\",\"volume\":\"196 31\",\"pages\":\"E1066-E1075\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426346/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Medical Association journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.240364\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Medical Association journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.240364","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大量入院患者在治疗结束前主动离院。至于 "医嘱前"(BMA)出院是否会增加后续药物过量的风险,目前仍不确定:我们利用加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省 20% 随机抽样居民的健康管理数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们重点研究了 2015 年至 2019 年期间发生的非选择性、非产科住院。我们使用生存分析法比较了 BMA 出院后前 30 天内致命或非致命非法药物过量率与医生建议出院后的比率:总体而言,189 808 次住院治疗中有 6440 次(3.4%)以 BMA 出院告终。在出院后 30 天内发生的 820 例用药过量中,有 755 例(92%)患者有药物使用障碍病史。在BMA出院后,未经调整的用药过量率是医生建议出院后的10倍,即使在调整了潜在的混杂因素后,BMA出院仍与随后的用药过量有关(粗略发生率为2.8%对0.3%;调整后的危险比[HR]为1.58;95%置信区间[CI]为1.31-1.89)。医疗建议出院前与后续急诊就诊率(调整后的危险比为 1.92;95% 置信区间为 1.83-2.02)和非计划再入院率(调整后的危险比为 2.07;95% 置信区间为 1.96-2.19)的增加有关,但与致命性药物过量和全因死亡率等非常见结果无显著关联:医学建议的出院前与出院后前 30 天药物过量风险的增加有关。为降低这一风险,应探索改进药物使用障碍的治疗、扩大预防用药过量服务的可及性以及出院后外联的新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Before medically advised" departure from hospital and subsequent drug overdose: a population-based cohort study.

Background: A substantial number of hospital admissions end in patient-initiated departure before medical treatment is complete. Whether "before medically advised" (BMA) discharge increases the risk of subsequent drug overdose remains uncertain.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using administrative health data from a 20% random sample of residents of British Columbia, Canada. We focused on nonelective, nonobstetric hospital stays occurring between 2015 and 2019. We used survival analysis to compare the rate of fatal or nonfatal illicit drug overdose in the first 30 days after BMA discharge versus the rate after physician-advised discharge.

Results: Overall, 6440 of 189 808 (3.4%) hospital stays ended in BMA discharge. Among 820 overdoses occurring in the first 30 days after any hospital discharge, 755 (92%) involved patients with a history of substance use disorder. Unadjusted overdose rates were 10-fold higher after BMA discharge than after physician-advised discharge, and BMA discharge was associated with subsequent overdose even after adjustment for potential confounders (crude incidence, 2.8% v. 0.3%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-1.89). Before medically advised discharge was associated with increases in subsequent emergency department visits (adjusted HR 1.92; 95% CI 1.83-2.02) and unplanned hospital readmissions (adjusted HR 2.07; 95% CI 1.96-2.19), but there was no significant association with the uncommon outcomes of fatal overdose and all-cause mortality.

Interpretation: Before medically advised departure is associated with an increased risk of drug overdose in the first 30 days after discharge. Improved treatment of substance use disorder, expanded access to overdose prevention services, and new means of postdeparture outreach should be explored to reduce this risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Medical Association journal
Canadian Medical Association journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
481
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) is a peer-reviewed general medical journal renowned for publishing original research, commentaries, analyses, reviews, clinical practice updates, and editorials. Led by Editor-in-Chief Dr. Kirsten Patrick, it has a significant impact on healthcare in Canada and globally, with a 2022 impact factor of 17.4. Its mission is to promote knowledge vital for the health of Canadians and the global community, guided by values of service, evidence, and integrity. The journal's vision emphasizes the importance of the best evidence, practice, and health outcomes. CMAJ covers a broad range of topics, focusing on contributing to the evidence base, influencing clinical practice, and raising awareness of pressing health issues among policymakers and the public. Since 2020, with the appointment of a Lead of Patient Involvement, CMAJ is committed to integrating patients into its governance and operations, encouraging their content submissions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信