{"title":"腹壁成形术中的逆行脐疝修补术:安全而简单的技术","authors":"Ron Skorochod, Yoram Wolf","doi":"10.1007/s00266-024-04368-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abdominoplasties are a very common procedure that is geared toward improving the abdominal contour and restoring quality of life. Main candidates for surgery are postpartum patients and patients after massive weight lost results in excess skin. The high incidence of umbilical hernias in the general population raises the question of whether combining its repair with cosmetic abdominoplasties is a safe and effective procedure.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Determine the safety of the \"retrograde umbilical hernia\" (RUH) technique, which utilizes a pre-peritoneal approach to the hernia, during abdominoplasty procedure and expand the literature on hernia repair during aesthetic abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is the retrospective cohort study of all patients that underwent abdominoplasty by the senior author. Eligible patients were divided into 2 groups: where one group included all patients who underwent abdominoplasty with RUH repair, and the second group underwent sole abdominoplasty. Baseline variables, surgical notes, and post-operative outcomes were obtained from the patients' medical records and analyzed for the purpose of this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 744 patients underwent abdominoplasties during the course of our study, 112 of which underwent concomitant umbilical hernia repair using the retrograde technique. The RUH technique was not found to result in a higher rate of complications compared to a similar population of traditional abdominoplasties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The retrograde umbilical hernia repair is a safe and efficient technique that can be easily implemented during abdominoplasty procedures in a heterogeneous population of patients.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iii: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrograde Umbilical Hernia Repair During Abdominoplasty: A Safe and Simple Technique.\",\"authors\":\"Ron Skorochod, Yoram Wolf\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00266-024-04368-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abdominoplasties are a very common procedure that is geared toward improving the abdominal contour and restoring quality of life. Main candidates for surgery are postpartum patients and patients after massive weight lost results in excess skin. The high incidence of umbilical hernias in the general population raises the question of whether combining its repair with cosmetic abdominoplasties is a safe and effective procedure.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Determine the safety of the \\\"retrograde umbilical hernia\\\" (RUH) technique, which utilizes a pre-peritoneal approach to the hernia, during abdominoplasty procedure and expand the literature on hernia repair during aesthetic abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is the retrospective cohort study of all patients that underwent abdominoplasty by the senior author. Eligible patients were divided into 2 groups: where one group included all patients who underwent abdominoplasty with RUH repair, and the second group underwent sole abdominoplasty. Baseline variables, surgical notes, and post-operative outcomes were obtained from the patients' medical records and analyzed for the purpose of this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 744 patients underwent abdominoplasties during the course of our study, 112 of which underwent concomitant umbilical hernia repair using the retrograde technique. The RUH technique was not found to result in a higher rate of complications compared to a similar population of traditional abdominoplasties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The retrograde umbilical hernia repair is a safe and efficient technique that can be easily implemented during abdominoplasty procedures in a heterogeneous population of patients.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iii: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04368-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04368-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:腹部整形是一种非常常见的手术,目的是改善腹部轮廓,恢复生活质量。手术的主要对象是产后患者和因大量减肥而导致皮肤过厚的患者。脐疝在普通人群中的发病率很高,这就提出了一个问题:将脐疝修补与腹部美容整形手术相结合是否是一种安全有效的手术。目的:确定腹部美容整形手术中 "逆行脐疝"(RUH)技术的安全性,该技术利用腹膜前入路对疝进行修补,并扩展有关腹部美容整形手术中疝修补的文献:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是由资深作者进行腹部整形手术的所有患者。符合条件的患者被分为两组:一组包括所有接受腹壁成形术并进行 RUH 修复的患者,另一组仅接受腹壁成形术。本研究从患者病历中获取基线变量、手术记录和术后结果,并对其进行分析:结果:在我们的研究过程中,共有 744 名患者接受了腹壁成形术,其中 112 名患者同时使用逆行技术进行了脐疝修补术。与类似的传统腹壁整形术相比,逆行脐疝修补术的并发症发生率并不高:结论:逆行脐疝修补术是一种安全高效的技术,可在腹部整形手术中轻松实施,适用于不同类型的患者:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章指定一个证据等级。有关这些循证医学等级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者须知 www.springer.com/00266 。
Retrograde Umbilical Hernia Repair During Abdominoplasty: A Safe and Simple Technique.
Background: Abdominoplasties are a very common procedure that is geared toward improving the abdominal contour and restoring quality of life. Main candidates for surgery are postpartum patients and patients after massive weight lost results in excess skin. The high incidence of umbilical hernias in the general population raises the question of whether combining its repair with cosmetic abdominoplasties is a safe and effective procedure.
Purpose: Determine the safety of the "retrograde umbilical hernia" (RUH) technique, which utilizes a pre-peritoneal approach to the hernia, during abdominoplasty procedure and expand the literature on hernia repair during aesthetic abdominal surgery.
Methods: This is the retrospective cohort study of all patients that underwent abdominoplasty by the senior author. Eligible patients were divided into 2 groups: where one group included all patients who underwent abdominoplasty with RUH repair, and the second group underwent sole abdominoplasty. Baseline variables, surgical notes, and post-operative outcomes were obtained from the patients' medical records and analyzed for the purpose of this study.
Results: In total, 744 patients underwent abdominoplasties during the course of our study, 112 of which underwent concomitant umbilical hernia repair using the retrograde technique. The RUH technique was not found to result in a higher rate of complications compared to a similar population of traditional abdominoplasties.
Conclusions: The retrograde umbilical hernia repair is a safe and efficient technique that can be easily implemented during abdominoplasty procedures in a heterogeneous population of patients.
Level of evidence iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .