{"title":"贝达喹啉耐药概率对耐利福平肺结核治疗决策的影响。","authors":"T P H Trang, R Kessels, T Decroo, A Van Rie","doi":"10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate diagnosis of bedaquiline (BDQ) resistance remains challenging. A Bayesian approach expresses this uncertainty as a probability of BDQ resistance (prBDQ<sup>R</sup>) with a 95% credible interval. We investigated how prBDQ<sup>R</sup> information influences BDQ prescribing decisions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We performed a discrete choice experiment with 55 international rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis physicians. We employed mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression to quantify the effect of prBDQ<sup>R</sup>, patient attributes, and contextual factors on the decision to continue BDQ or not when sequencing results become available.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PrBDQ<sup>R</sup> was the most influential factor for BDQ decision-making, three times greater than treatment response. Each percentage point increase in prBDQ<sup>R</sup> resulted in 8.2% lower odds (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.90-0.93) of continuing BDQ as a fully effective drug and 5.0% lower odds (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.96) of continuing it but not counting it as an effective drug. The most favourable patient profile for prescribing BDQ as a fully effective drug was a patient receiving the BPaLM regimen (BDQ, pretomanid, linezolid and moxifloxacin) with low prBDQ<sup>R</sup>, good 1-month treatment response, fluoroquinolone-susceptible TB, and no prior BDQ treatment. Physicians with higher discomfort with uncertainty and more years of experience with BDQ were more inclined to stop BDQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the uncertainty of genotype-phenotype associations, physicians valued prBDQ<sup>R</sup> for BDQ decision-making in rifampicin-resistant TB treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":519984,"journal":{"name":"IJTLD open","volume":"1 9","pages":"384-390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11409166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of bedaquiline resistance probability on treatment decision for rifampicin-resistant TB.\",\"authors\":\"T P H Trang, R Kessels, T Decroo, A Van Rie\",\"doi\":\"10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate diagnosis of bedaquiline (BDQ) resistance remains challenging. A Bayesian approach expresses this uncertainty as a probability of BDQ resistance (prBDQ<sup>R</sup>) with a 95% credible interval. We investigated how prBDQ<sup>R</sup> information influences BDQ prescribing decisions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We performed a discrete choice experiment with 55 international rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis physicians. We employed mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression to quantify the effect of prBDQ<sup>R</sup>, patient attributes, and contextual factors on the decision to continue BDQ or not when sequencing results become available.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PrBDQ<sup>R</sup> was the most influential factor for BDQ decision-making, three times greater than treatment response. Each percentage point increase in prBDQ<sup>R</sup> resulted in 8.2% lower odds (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.90-0.93) of continuing BDQ as a fully effective drug and 5.0% lower odds (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.96) of continuing it but not counting it as an effective drug. The most favourable patient profile for prescribing BDQ as a fully effective drug was a patient receiving the BPaLM regimen (BDQ, pretomanid, linezolid and moxifloxacin) with low prBDQ<sup>R</sup>, good 1-month treatment response, fluoroquinolone-susceptible TB, and no prior BDQ treatment. Physicians with higher discomfort with uncertainty and more years of experience with BDQ were more inclined to stop BDQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the uncertainty of genotype-phenotype associations, physicians valued prBDQ<sup>R</sup> for BDQ decision-making in rifampicin-resistant TB treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJTLD open\",\"volume\":\"1 9\",\"pages\":\"384-390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11409166/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJTLD open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0362\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJTLD open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of bedaquiline resistance probability on treatment decision for rifampicin-resistant TB.
Background: Accurate diagnosis of bedaquiline (BDQ) resistance remains challenging. A Bayesian approach expresses this uncertainty as a probability of BDQ resistance (prBDQR) with a 95% credible interval. We investigated how prBDQR information influences BDQ prescribing decisions.
Method: We performed a discrete choice experiment with 55 international rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis physicians. We employed mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression to quantify the effect of prBDQR, patient attributes, and contextual factors on the decision to continue BDQ or not when sequencing results become available.
Results: PrBDQR was the most influential factor for BDQ decision-making, three times greater than treatment response. Each percentage point increase in prBDQR resulted in 8.2% lower odds (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.90-0.93) of continuing BDQ as a fully effective drug and 5.0% lower odds (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.96) of continuing it but not counting it as an effective drug. The most favourable patient profile for prescribing BDQ as a fully effective drug was a patient receiving the BPaLM regimen (BDQ, pretomanid, linezolid and moxifloxacin) with low prBDQR, good 1-month treatment response, fluoroquinolone-susceptible TB, and no prior BDQ treatment. Physicians with higher discomfort with uncertainty and more years of experience with BDQ were more inclined to stop BDQ.
Conclusion: Given the uncertainty of genotype-phenotype associations, physicians valued prBDQR for BDQ decision-making in rifampicin-resistant TB treatment.