干细胞疗法对糖尿病足溃疡愈合疗效比较的随机对照试验网络元分析》(A Network Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Comparative Efficacy of Stem Cells Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing)。

Shiv Kumar Mudgal, Subodh Kumar, Suresh K Sharma, Rakhi Gaur, Dibyajyoti Saikia, Harminder Singh, Saurabh Varshney, Ashoo Grover, Seshadri Reddy Varikasuvu
{"title":"干细胞疗法对糖尿病足溃疡愈合疗效比较的随机对照试验网络元分析》(A Network Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Comparative Efficacy of Stem Cells Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing)。","authors":"Shiv Kumar Mudgal, Subodh Kumar, Suresh K Sharma, Rakhi Gaur, Dibyajyoti Saikia, Harminder Singh, Saurabh Varshney, Ashoo Grover, Seshadri Reddy Varikasuvu","doi":"10.1177/15347346241286216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stem cell therapy in diabetic foot ulcer has emerged as a promising treatment option to promote ulcer healing. This network meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate how they compete with each other and their ranking with respect to chances of ulcer healing. A systematic search strategy to retrieve data from five databases, were used to identify potential studies. Randomized controlled trial or clinical controlled trial, published in English, using any type of stem cells as intervention in individuals aged over 18 years diagnosed with diabetic foot ulcers were included. This network meta-analysis was performed using frequentist method using R version 4.2.1. Eighteen clinical trials were included in the study which included 13 interventions. The study found that most of the stem cells were significantly promoting ulcer healing chances with human viable wound matrix (hVWM) [RR 2.91; CI: 1.28, 6.64], peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) [RR 2.35; CI: 1.21, 4.55], bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) [RR 2.20; CI: 1.34, 3.60], were top three stem cell options among all. P score also suggested the same. Risk of bias study suggested that there was \"some concern or \"high risk'' among majority of studies. It is evident from this study that bone marrow mononuclear cells were found to be most effective in wound healing in cases of diabetic foot ulcer in that order. Though there was no significant difference between these and more studies were required to ascertain whether they differ in term of efficacy for the clinical outcome of ulcer healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Comparative Efficacy of Stem Cells Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing.\",\"authors\":\"Shiv Kumar Mudgal, Subodh Kumar, Suresh K Sharma, Rakhi Gaur, Dibyajyoti Saikia, Harminder Singh, Saurabh Varshney, Ashoo Grover, Seshadri Reddy Varikasuvu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15347346241286216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Stem cell therapy in diabetic foot ulcer has emerged as a promising treatment option to promote ulcer healing. This network meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate how they compete with each other and their ranking with respect to chances of ulcer healing. A systematic search strategy to retrieve data from five databases, were used to identify potential studies. Randomized controlled trial or clinical controlled trial, published in English, using any type of stem cells as intervention in individuals aged over 18 years diagnosed with diabetic foot ulcers were included. This network meta-analysis was performed using frequentist method using R version 4.2.1. Eighteen clinical trials were included in the study which included 13 interventions. The study found that most of the stem cells were significantly promoting ulcer healing chances with human viable wound matrix (hVWM) [RR 2.91; CI: 1.28, 6.64], peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) [RR 2.35; CI: 1.21, 4.55], bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) [RR 2.20; CI: 1.34, 3.60], were top three stem cell options among all. P score also suggested the same. Risk of bias study suggested that there was \\\"some concern or \\\"high risk'' among majority of studies. It is evident from this study that bone marrow mononuclear cells were found to be most effective in wound healing in cases of diabetic foot ulcer in that order. Though there was no significant difference between these and more studies were required to ascertain whether they differ in term of efficacy for the clinical outcome of ulcer healing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The international journal of lower extremity wounds\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The international journal of lower extremity wounds\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346241286216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346241286216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

干细胞治疗糖尿病足溃疡已成为促进溃疡愈合的一种很有前景的治疗方法。本网络荟萃分析旨在评估干细胞疗法与溃疡愈合几率之间的相互影响和排名。我们采用了系统性检索策略,从五个数据库中检索数据,以确定潜在的研究。研究对象包括用任何类型的干细胞对18岁以上被诊断患有糖尿病足溃疡的患者进行干预的随机对照试验或临床对照试验。该网络荟萃分析采用频数主义方法,使用 R 4.2.1 版本。研究共纳入18项临床试验,其中包括13项干预措施。研究发现,大多数干细胞都能显著促进溃疡愈合,其中人类存活伤口基质(hVWM)[RR 2.91;CI:1.28,6.64]、外周血单核细胞(PBMNC)[RR 2.35;CI:1.21,4.55]、骨髓间充质干细胞(BMMSCs)[RR 2.20;CI:1.34,3.60]是所有干细胞选择中的前三名。P评分也表明了这一点。偏倚风险研究表明,大多数研究存在 "一定程度的担忧 "或 "高风险"。这项研究表明,骨髓单核细胞对糖尿病足溃疡患者的伤口愈合最有效。虽然它们之间没有明显的差异,但还需要更多的研究来确定它们对溃疡愈合的临床结果是否有不同的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Comparative Efficacy of Stem Cells Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing.

Stem cell therapy in diabetic foot ulcer has emerged as a promising treatment option to promote ulcer healing. This network meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate how they compete with each other and their ranking with respect to chances of ulcer healing. A systematic search strategy to retrieve data from five databases, were used to identify potential studies. Randomized controlled trial or clinical controlled trial, published in English, using any type of stem cells as intervention in individuals aged over 18 years diagnosed with diabetic foot ulcers were included. This network meta-analysis was performed using frequentist method using R version 4.2.1. Eighteen clinical trials were included in the study which included 13 interventions. The study found that most of the stem cells were significantly promoting ulcer healing chances with human viable wound matrix (hVWM) [RR 2.91; CI: 1.28, 6.64], peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) [RR 2.35; CI: 1.21, 4.55], bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) [RR 2.20; CI: 1.34, 3.60], were top three stem cell options among all. P score also suggested the same. Risk of bias study suggested that there was "some concern or "high risk'' among majority of studies. It is evident from this study that bone marrow mononuclear cells were found to be most effective in wound healing in cases of diabetic foot ulcer in that order. Though there was no significant difference between these and more studies were required to ascertain whether they differ in term of efficacy for the clinical outcome of ulcer healing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信