Áron Ghimessy, Péter Radeczky, Klára Török, Levente Bogyó, Kristóf Csende, László Mészáros, Balázs Gieszer, Hanna Tihanyi, Gábor Tarsoly, Márton Csaba, Sára Lality, Kázmér István Hartyánszky, Ákos Kocsis, Ildikó Madurka, László Agócs, Ferenc Rényi-Vámos
{"title":"[机器人辅助胸腔手术：我们的初次体验]。","authors":"Áron Ghimessy, Péter Radeczky, Klára Török, Levente Bogyó, Kristóf Csende, László Mészáros, Balázs Gieszer, Hanna Tihanyi, Gábor Tarsoly, Márton Csaba, Sára Lality, Kázmér István Hartyánszky, Ákos Kocsis, Ildikó Madurka, László Agócs, Ferenc Rényi-Vámos","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our goal was to examine the postoperative indicators after the first 300 thoracic robotic cases in the National Institute of Oncology. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological and postoperative indicators of the first 300 patients. We also compared the first 30 cases performed by one surgeon to his 30 VATS (video-assisted thoracic surgery) and open cases. The average hospital stay was 5.2 days, the chest tube was removed on the second day. Conversion, need for reoperation and morbidity was low (1.8%, 2% and 10.6%, respectively). The change in operating time slows down after 20 cases. The hospital stay and complications were slightly favorable with RATS (robotic-assisted thoracic surgery) than with VATS. The intensive care stay, however, was significantly shorter while the amount of removed lymph nodes was significantly higher in RATS procedures. As a conclusion, RATS is a safe technique in thoracic surgery. Moreover, more lymph nodes are removed with RATS which can lead to better staging.</p>","PeriodicalId":94127,"journal":{"name":"Magyar onkologia","volume":"68 3","pages":"223-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Robot-assisted thoracic surgery. Our first experiences].\",\"authors\":\"Áron Ghimessy, Péter Radeczky, Klára Török, Levente Bogyó, Kristóf Csende, László Mészáros, Balázs Gieszer, Hanna Tihanyi, Gábor Tarsoly, Márton Csaba, Sára Lality, Kázmér István Hartyánszky, Ákos Kocsis, Ildikó Madurka, László Agócs, Ferenc Rényi-Vámos\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our goal was to examine the postoperative indicators after the first 300 thoracic robotic cases in the National Institute of Oncology. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological and postoperative indicators of the first 300 patients. We also compared the first 30 cases performed by one surgeon to his 30 VATS (video-assisted thoracic surgery) and open cases. The average hospital stay was 5.2 days, the chest tube was removed on the second day. Conversion, need for reoperation and morbidity was low (1.8%, 2% and 10.6%, respectively). The change in operating time slows down after 20 cases. The hospital stay and complications were slightly favorable with RATS (robotic-assisted thoracic surgery) than with VATS. The intensive care stay, however, was significantly shorter while the amount of removed lymph nodes was significantly higher in RATS procedures. As a conclusion, RATS is a safe technique in thoracic surgery. Moreover, more lymph nodes are removed with RATS which can lead to better staging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magyar onkologia\",\"volume\":\"68 3\",\"pages\":\"223-228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magyar onkologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magyar onkologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Robot-assisted thoracic surgery. Our first experiences].
Our goal was to examine the postoperative indicators after the first 300 thoracic robotic cases in the National Institute of Oncology. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological and postoperative indicators of the first 300 patients. We also compared the first 30 cases performed by one surgeon to his 30 VATS (video-assisted thoracic surgery) and open cases. The average hospital stay was 5.2 days, the chest tube was removed on the second day. Conversion, need for reoperation and morbidity was low (1.8%, 2% and 10.6%, respectively). The change in operating time slows down after 20 cases. The hospital stay and complications were slightly favorable with RATS (robotic-assisted thoracic surgery) than with VATS. The intensive care stay, however, was significantly shorter while the amount of removed lymph nodes was significantly higher in RATS procedures. As a conclusion, RATS is a safe technique in thoracic surgery. Moreover, more lymph nodes are removed with RATS which can lead to better staging.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
