莫桑比克医疗保健中常见精神障碍、严重精神障碍、药物使用障碍和自杀风险筛查的心理计量学评估。

Kathryn L Lovero, Melissa A Stockton, M Claire Greene, Cale Basaraba, Saida Khan, Dirceu Mabunda, Flavio Mandlate, Lidia Gouveia, Wilza Fumo, Melanie M Wall, Cristiane S Duarte, Maria A Oquendo, Milton L Wainberg
{"title":"莫桑比克医疗保健中常见精神障碍、严重精神障碍、药物使用障碍和自杀风险筛查的心理计量学评估。","authors":"Kathryn L Lovero, Melissa A Stockton, M Claire Greene, Cale Basaraba, Saida Khan, Dirceu Mabunda, Flavio Mandlate, Lidia Gouveia, Wilza Fumo, Melanie M Wall, Cristiane S Duarte, Maria A Oquendo, Milton L Wainberg","doi":"10.18103/mra.v12i8.5294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Globally, mental and substance use disorders are a leading cause of disease burden. In low- and middle-income countries, where there is an extreme shortage of trained mental health specialists, validated, brief screening tools for mental and substance use disorders are required for non-specialists to efficiently identify patients in need of mental health care. Mozambique, one of the poorest countries in the world, has fewer than two mental health specialists for every 100,000 people. In the present study, we evaluated a comprehensive set of seven measures for depression, anxiety, somatization, alcohol use disorder, substance use disorder, psychosis and mania, and suicide risk among N=911 Mozambican adults in general healthcare settings. All instruments demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (α > 0.75). Compared to diagnoses made by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, all measures showed good criterion validity (AUC > 0.75), except the Psychosis Screening Questionnaire, which showed low sensitivity (0.58) for psychotic disorder. No substantial differences were observed in internal consistency when stratifying by gender, age, education level, primary language, facility-type, and patient status; criterion validity showed some variability when stratified by sub-population, particularly for education, primary language, and whether the participant was seeking care that day. Exploratory factor analyses indicated that the measures best differentiate categories of diagnoses (common mental disorder, severe mental disorders, substance use disorders, and suicide risk) rather than individual diagnoses, suggesting the utility of a transdiagnostic approach. Our findings support the use of these measures in Mozambique to identify common mental disorders, substance use disorders, and suicide risk, but indicate further research is needed to develop an adequate screen for severe mental disorders. Given the limited mental health specialists in this and other LMIC settings, these brief measures can support non-specialist provision of mental health services and promote closure of the treatment gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":94137,"journal":{"name":"Medical research archives","volume":"12 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11391859/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Evaluation of Screens for Common Mental Disorders, Severe Mental Disorders, Substance Use Disorders, and Suicide Risk in Mozambican Healthcare.\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn L Lovero, Melissa A Stockton, M Claire Greene, Cale Basaraba, Saida Khan, Dirceu Mabunda, Flavio Mandlate, Lidia Gouveia, Wilza Fumo, Melanie M Wall, Cristiane S Duarte, Maria A Oquendo, Milton L Wainberg\",\"doi\":\"10.18103/mra.v12i8.5294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Globally, mental and substance use disorders are a leading cause of disease burden. In low- and middle-income countries, where there is an extreme shortage of trained mental health specialists, validated, brief screening tools for mental and substance use disorders are required for non-specialists to efficiently identify patients in need of mental health care. Mozambique, one of the poorest countries in the world, has fewer than two mental health specialists for every 100,000 people. In the present study, we evaluated a comprehensive set of seven measures for depression, anxiety, somatization, alcohol use disorder, substance use disorder, psychosis and mania, and suicide risk among N=911 Mozambican adults in general healthcare settings. All instruments demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (α > 0.75). Compared to diagnoses made by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, all measures showed good criterion validity (AUC > 0.75), except the Psychosis Screening Questionnaire, which showed low sensitivity (0.58) for psychotic disorder. No substantial differences were observed in internal consistency when stratifying by gender, age, education level, primary language, facility-type, and patient status; criterion validity showed some variability when stratified by sub-population, particularly for education, primary language, and whether the participant was seeking care that day. Exploratory factor analyses indicated that the measures best differentiate categories of diagnoses (common mental disorder, severe mental disorders, substance use disorders, and suicide risk) rather than individual diagnoses, suggesting the utility of a transdiagnostic approach. Our findings support the use of these measures in Mozambique to identify common mental disorders, substance use disorders, and suicide risk, but indicate further research is needed to develop an adequate screen for severe mental disorders. Given the limited mental health specialists in this and other LMIC settings, these brief measures can support non-specialist provision of mental health services and promote closure of the treatment gap.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical research archives\",\"volume\":\"12 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11391859/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical research archives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i8.5294\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical research archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i8.5294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内,精神障碍和药物使用障碍是造成疾病负担的主要原因。在中低收入国家,训练有素的心理健康专家极度缺乏,因此需要针对精神障碍和药物使用障碍的有效、简短筛查工具,以便非专业人员有效识别需要心理健康护理的患者。莫桑比克是世界上最贫穷的国家之一,每 10 万人中只有不到两名心理健康专家。在本研究中,我们对莫桑比克 911 名成年人的抑郁、焦虑、躯体化、酒精使用障碍、药物使用障碍、精神病和躁狂症以及自杀风险进行了全面评估。所有工具的内部一致性均可接受(α > 0.75)。与迷你国际神经精神病学访谈的诊断结果相比,除精神病筛查问卷对精神病性障碍的敏感性较低(0.58)外,其他所有测量指标均显示出良好的标准效度(AUC > 0.75)。按性别、年龄、受教育程度、主要语言、机构类型和患者身份进行分层时,内部一致性未发现实质性差异;按亚人群进行分层时,标准效度显示出一定的差异性,尤其是受教育程度、主要语言和受试者当天是否就诊。探索性因素分析表明,这些测量方法最能区分诊断类别(常见精神障碍、严重精神障碍、药物使用障碍和自杀风险),而不是单个诊断,这表明了跨诊断方法的实用性。我们的研究结果支持在莫桑比克使用这些测量方法来识别普通精神障碍、药物使用障碍和自杀风险,但表明还需要进一步的研究来开发适当的严重精神障碍筛查方法。鉴于莫桑比克和其他低收入与中等收入国家的精神卫生专家有限,这些简明的测量方法可以支持非专家提供精神卫生服务,并促进缩小治疗差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric Evaluation of Screens for Common Mental Disorders, Severe Mental Disorders, Substance Use Disorders, and Suicide Risk in Mozambican Healthcare.

Globally, mental and substance use disorders are a leading cause of disease burden. In low- and middle-income countries, where there is an extreme shortage of trained mental health specialists, validated, brief screening tools for mental and substance use disorders are required for non-specialists to efficiently identify patients in need of mental health care. Mozambique, one of the poorest countries in the world, has fewer than two mental health specialists for every 100,000 people. In the present study, we evaluated a comprehensive set of seven measures for depression, anxiety, somatization, alcohol use disorder, substance use disorder, psychosis and mania, and suicide risk among N=911 Mozambican adults in general healthcare settings. All instruments demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (α > 0.75). Compared to diagnoses made by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, all measures showed good criterion validity (AUC > 0.75), except the Psychosis Screening Questionnaire, which showed low sensitivity (0.58) for psychotic disorder. No substantial differences were observed in internal consistency when stratifying by gender, age, education level, primary language, facility-type, and patient status; criterion validity showed some variability when stratified by sub-population, particularly for education, primary language, and whether the participant was seeking care that day. Exploratory factor analyses indicated that the measures best differentiate categories of diagnoses (common mental disorder, severe mental disorders, substance use disorders, and suicide risk) rather than individual diagnoses, suggesting the utility of a transdiagnostic approach. Our findings support the use of these measures in Mozambique to identify common mental disorders, substance use disorders, and suicide risk, but indicate further research is needed to develop an adequate screen for severe mental disorders. Given the limited mental health specialists in this and other LMIC settings, these brief measures can support non-specialist provision of mental health services and promote closure of the treatment gap.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信