非黏膜疏通(重启)手术作为对生物制剂局部无反应患者的一种可能的挽救疗法。

Francesca Pirola, Francesco Giombi, Gian Marco Pace, Michele Cerasuolo, Jessica Zuppardo, Martina Sebastiani, Gianmarco Giunta, Giuseppe Mercante, Giuseppe Spriano, Luca Malvezzi
{"title":"非黏膜疏通(重启)手术作为对生物制剂局部无反应患者的一种可能的挽救疗法。","authors":"Francesca Pirola, Francesco Giombi, Gian Marco Pace, Michele Cerasuolo, Jessica Zuppardo, Martina Sebastiani, Gianmarco Giunta, Giuseppe Mercante, Giuseppe Spriano, Luca Malvezzi","doi":"10.1177/01455613241282566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Evaluation of effectiveness of non-mucosa-sparing (eg, reboot) surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), poorly responders to mAb therapy, who failed repeated comprehensive endoscopic surgeries. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective observational study. Patients who were under mAb for a comorbid condition but still had no control over their CRSwNP were included. Data collected were preoperative tissue eosinophilia, nasal polyp score (NPS), 22-item sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22), visual analog scale (VAS) for nasal symptoms, Lund-Kennedy score for nasal crusts (LK-c) and synechiae (LK-s), and Lund-Mackay score (LMS). The same data were also collected postoperatively (at 12 months), besides LMS, and compared. <b>Results:</b> Overall, 20 patients were included. Pre-reboot scores were: NPS = 4.95 ± 1.70; SNOT-22 = 63.90 ± 19.15; VAS-global = 7.06 ± 1.50; LM = 19.0 ± 4.01; LK-c = 1.10 ± 0.64; and LK-s = 1.30 ± 0.73. Tissue biopsies revealed a high density of eosinophils in all cases, ≥10/HPF (range 10-60). Mean postoperative outcomes were: NPS = 0; SNOT-22 = 17.90 ± 6.80; VAS-global = 1.91 ± 1.17; LK-c = 1.45 ± 0.51; and LK-s = 1.50 ± 0.61. The difference of mean pre- and postoperative scores was significant for both NPS, SNOT-22 and VAS-global (<i>P</i> < .001). No differences were observed for LK-c and LK-s (<i>P</i> > .05). Nasal specimens showed markedly reduced tissue eosinophils (100% of cases). <b>Conclusion:</b> Reboot sinus surgery might be an effective solution for recalcitrant CRSwNP patients unresponsive to mAbs and multiple sinus surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":93984,"journal":{"name":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-Mucosa Sparing (Reboot) Surgery as a Possible Rescue Therapy in Patients Locally Unresponsive to Biologics.\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Pirola, Francesco Giombi, Gian Marco Pace, Michele Cerasuolo, Jessica Zuppardo, Martina Sebastiani, Gianmarco Giunta, Giuseppe Mercante, Giuseppe Spriano, Luca Malvezzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01455613241282566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Evaluation of effectiveness of non-mucosa-sparing (eg, reboot) surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), poorly responders to mAb therapy, who failed repeated comprehensive endoscopic surgeries. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective observational study. Patients who were under mAb for a comorbid condition but still had no control over their CRSwNP were included. Data collected were preoperative tissue eosinophilia, nasal polyp score (NPS), 22-item sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22), visual analog scale (VAS) for nasal symptoms, Lund-Kennedy score for nasal crusts (LK-c) and synechiae (LK-s), and Lund-Mackay score (LMS). The same data were also collected postoperatively (at 12 months), besides LMS, and compared. <b>Results:</b> Overall, 20 patients were included. Pre-reboot scores were: NPS = 4.95 ± 1.70; SNOT-22 = 63.90 ± 19.15; VAS-global = 7.06 ± 1.50; LM = 19.0 ± 4.01; LK-c = 1.10 ± 0.64; and LK-s = 1.30 ± 0.73. Tissue biopsies revealed a high density of eosinophils in all cases, ≥10/HPF (range 10-60). Mean postoperative outcomes were: NPS = 0; SNOT-22 = 17.90 ± 6.80; VAS-global = 1.91 ± 1.17; LK-c = 1.45 ± 0.51; and LK-s = 1.50 ± 0.61. The difference of mean pre- and postoperative scores was significant for both NPS, SNOT-22 and VAS-global (<i>P</i> < .001). No differences were observed for LK-c and LK-s (<i>P</i> > .05). Nasal specimens showed markedly reduced tissue eosinophils (100% of cases). <b>Conclusion:</b> Reboot sinus surgery might be an effective solution for recalcitrant CRSwNP patients unresponsive to mAbs and multiple sinus surgeries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ear, nose, & throat journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ear, nose, & throat journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613241282566\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613241282566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估对慢性鼻炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)、对 mAb 反应不佳的患者进行非黏膜保留(如重新启动)手术的效果:评估对 mAb 治疗效果不佳、多次内窥镜综合手术失败的慢性鼻炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)患者实施非黏膜保留(如重启)手术的效果。方法:回顾性观察研究:回顾性观察研究。研究对象包括因合并症正在接受 mAb 治疗但仍无法控制 CRSwNP 的患者。收集的数据包括术前组织嗜酸性粒细胞增多、鼻息肉评分(NPS)、22 项鼻窦结果测试(SNOT-22)、鼻腔症状视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Lund-Kennedy 鼻痂评分(LK-c)和鼻窦脓肿评分(LK-s)以及 Lund-Mackay 评分(LMS)。除 LMS 外,还收集了术后(12 个月)的相同数据并进行比较。结果:共纳入 20 名患者。重启前评分为NPS = 4.95 ± 1.70;SNOT-22 = 63.90 ± 19.15;VAS-global = 7.06 ± 1.50;LM = 19.0 ± 4.01;LK-c = 1.10 ± 0.64;LK-s = 1.30 ± 0.73。组织活检显示,所有病例的嗜酸性粒细胞密度都很高,≥10/HPF(范围 10-60)。平均术后结果为NPS = 0;SNOT-22 = 17.90 ± 6.80;VAS-global = 1.91 ± 1.17;LK-c = 1.45 ± 0.51;LK-s = 1.50 ± 0.61。NPS、SNOT-22 和 VAS-global 的术前和术后平均评分差异显著(P < .001)。LK-c和LK-s无差异(P > .05)。鼻腔标本显示组织嗜酸性粒细胞明显减少(100% 的病例)。结论:对于对 mAbs 和多次鼻窦手术反应迟钝的 CRSwNP 患者,重新启动鼻窦手术可能是一种有效的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-Mucosa Sparing (Reboot) Surgery as a Possible Rescue Therapy in Patients Locally Unresponsive to Biologics.

Objective: Evaluation of effectiveness of non-mucosa-sparing (eg, reboot) surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), poorly responders to mAb therapy, who failed repeated comprehensive endoscopic surgeries. Methods: Retrospective observational study. Patients who were under mAb for a comorbid condition but still had no control over their CRSwNP were included. Data collected were preoperative tissue eosinophilia, nasal polyp score (NPS), 22-item sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22), visual analog scale (VAS) for nasal symptoms, Lund-Kennedy score for nasal crusts (LK-c) and synechiae (LK-s), and Lund-Mackay score (LMS). The same data were also collected postoperatively (at 12 months), besides LMS, and compared. Results: Overall, 20 patients were included. Pre-reboot scores were: NPS = 4.95 ± 1.70; SNOT-22 = 63.90 ± 19.15; VAS-global = 7.06 ± 1.50; LM = 19.0 ± 4.01; LK-c = 1.10 ± 0.64; and LK-s = 1.30 ± 0.73. Tissue biopsies revealed a high density of eosinophils in all cases, ≥10/HPF (range 10-60). Mean postoperative outcomes were: NPS = 0; SNOT-22 = 17.90 ± 6.80; VAS-global = 1.91 ± 1.17; LK-c = 1.45 ± 0.51; and LK-s = 1.50 ± 0.61. The difference of mean pre- and postoperative scores was significant for both NPS, SNOT-22 and VAS-global (P < .001). No differences were observed for LK-c and LK-s (P > .05). Nasal specimens showed markedly reduced tissue eosinophils (100% of cases). Conclusion: Reboot sinus surgery might be an effective solution for recalcitrant CRSwNP patients unresponsive to mAbs and multiple sinus surgeries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信