比较双相超声和数字减影血管造影术对胫骨血管疾病的评估效果。

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2024-09-13 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.69327
Rubén Neris, Ali Kimyaghalam, Kuldeep Singh
{"title":"比较双相超声和数字减影血管造影术对胫骨血管疾病的评估效果。","authors":"Rubén Neris, Ali Kimyaghalam, Kuldeep Singh","doi":"10.7759/cureus.69327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Duplex ultrasonography (DUS) is readily available and often used as the first diagnostic test for patients with peripheral artery diseases (PADs). PAD is a disease that affects the general population but more commonly affects diabetics. To date, the role of DUS in the assessment of tibial vessel disease is inconclusive at best. The goal of our study is to assess the validity of DUS in characterizing the presence and severity of tibial diseases via comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) findings. Methods This is a single-center retrospective cohort study analyzing three arterial segments (anterior tibial, posterior tibial, and fibular arteries) in patients who received a duplex study followed by DSA within a 30-day period. All arterial segments were graded from normal (Grade 0) to occluded (Grade 4), based on duplex interpretation and directly compared to direct visualization findings from DSA. Using statistical methods, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of DUS were determined. Results A total of 171 tibial vessel segments from 57 enrolled subjects with critical limb ischemia symptoms were analyzed in this study. The agreement between both modalities was poor (Kappa=0.19, p < 0.05), with DUS demonstrating a significant underestimation of vessel pathologies. This is also reflected by the overall sub-optimal sensitivity (23%), specificity (84%), PPV (69%), and NPV (41%) in DUS when compared to DSA results as the gold standard. Conclusion Significant disagreements were noted in this study between DUS and DSA findings, primarily significant underestimation of tibial vessel disease by the DUS when compared with the DSA. Caution is advised in the clinical application of DUS in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) symptoms and multi-segment tibial vessels due to its demonstrated limitations in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11401628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Duplex Ultrasound and Digital Subtraction Angiography for Assessing Tibial Vessel Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Rubén Neris, Ali Kimyaghalam, Kuldeep Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.7759/cureus.69327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Duplex ultrasonography (DUS) is readily available and often used as the first diagnostic test for patients with peripheral artery diseases (PADs). PAD is a disease that affects the general population but more commonly affects diabetics. To date, the role of DUS in the assessment of tibial vessel disease is inconclusive at best. The goal of our study is to assess the validity of DUS in characterizing the presence and severity of tibial diseases via comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) findings. Methods This is a single-center retrospective cohort study analyzing three arterial segments (anterior tibial, posterior tibial, and fibular arteries) in patients who received a duplex study followed by DSA within a 30-day period. All arterial segments were graded from normal (Grade 0) to occluded (Grade 4), based on duplex interpretation and directly compared to direct visualization findings from DSA. Using statistical methods, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of DUS were determined. Results A total of 171 tibial vessel segments from 57 enrolled subjects with critical limb ischemia symptoms were analyzed in this study. The agreement between both modalities was poor (Kappa=0.19, p < 0.05), with DUS demonstrating a significant underestimation of vessel pathologies. This is also reflected by the overall sub-optimal sensitivity (23%), specificity (84%), PPV (69%), and NPV (41%) in DUS when compared to DSA results as the gold standard. Conclusion Significant disagreements were noted in this study between DUS and DSA findings, primarily significant underestimation of tibial vessel disease by the DUS when compared with the DSA. Caution is advised in the clinical application of DUS in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) symptoms and multi-segment tibial vessels due to its demonstrated limitations in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cureus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11401628/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cureus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.69327\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.69327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 双反射超声波检查(DUS)很容易获得,通常用作外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者的首次诊断检查。PAD 是一种影响普通人群的疾病,但更常见于糖尿病患者。迄今为止,DUS 在评估胫骨血管疾病中的作用充其量只能说是尚无定论。我们的研究旨在通过与数字减影血管造影(DSA)结果的比较,评估 DUS 在描述胫骨血管疾病的存在和严重程度方面的有效性。方法 这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,分析了 30 天内接受双工检查和 DSA 的患者的三个动脉段(胫前动脉、胫后动脉和腓动脉)。所有动脉段都根据双工分析结果从正常(0 级)到闭塞(4 级)进行了分级,并与 DSA 的直接显像结果进行了直接比较。使用统计方法确定了 DUS 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值 (PPV)、阴性预测值 (NPV) 和准确性。结果 本研究共分析了 57 名有严重肢体缺血症状的受试者的 171 个胫骨血管节段。两种模式之间的一致性很差(Kappa=0.19,p < 0.05),DUS 明显低估了血管的病变。与作为金标准的 DSA 结果相比,DUS 的灵敏度(23%)、特异性(84%)、PPV(69%)和 NPV(41%)均未达到最佳水平,这也反映了这一点。结论 在本研究中,DUS 和 DSA 结果之间存在显著差异,主要是 DUS 与 DSA 相比明显低估了胫骨血管疾病。由于 DUS 在本研究中的局限性,建议对有慢性肢体缺血(CLTI)症状和多节胫骨血管的患者临床应用 DUS 时要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Duplex Ultrasound and Digital Subtraction Angiography for Assessing Tibial Vessel Disease.

Background Duplex ultrasonography (DUS) is readily available and often used as the first diagnostic test for patients with peripheral artery diseases (PADs). PAD is a disease that affects the general population but more commonly affects diabetics. To date, the role of DUS in the assessment of tibial vessel disease is inconclusive at best. The goal of our study is to assess the validity of DUS in characterizing the presence and severity of tibial diseases via comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) findings. Methods This is a single-center retrospective cohort study analyzing three arterial segments (anterior tibial, posterior tibial, and fibular arteries) in patients who received a duplex study followed by DSA within a 30-day period. All arterial segments were graded from normal (Grade 0) to occluded (Grade 4), based on duplex interpretation and directly compared to direct visualization findings from DSA. Using statistical methods, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of DUS were determined. Results A total of 171 tibial vessel segments from 57 enrolled subjects with critical limb ischemia symptoms were analyzed in this study. The agreement between both modalities was poor (Kappa=0.19, p < 0.05), with DUS demonstrating a significant underestimation of vessel pathologies. This is also reflected by the overall sub-optimal sensitivity (23%), specificity (84%), PPV (69%), and NPV (41%) in DUS when compared to DSA results as the gold standard. Conclusion Significant disagreements were noted in this study between DUS and DSA findings, primarily significant underestimation of tibial vessel disease by the DUS when compared with the DSA. Caution is advised in the clinical application of DUS in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) symptoms and multi-segment tibial vessels due to its demonstrated limitations in this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信