{"title":"比较双相超声和数字减影血管造影术对胫骨血管疾病的评估效果。","authors":"Rubén Neris, Ali Kimyaghalam, Kuldeep Singh","doi":"10.7759/cureus.69327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Duplex ultrasonography (DUS) is readily available and often used as the first diagnostic test for patients with peripheral artery diseases (PADs). PAD is a disease that affects the general population but more commonly affects diabetics. To date, the role of DUS in the assessment of tibial vessel disease is inconclusive at best. The goal of our study is to assess the validity of DUS in characterizing the presence and severity of tibial diseases via comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) findings. Methods This is a single-center retrospective cohort study analyzing three arterial segments (anterior tibial, posterior tibial, and fibular arteries) in patients who received a duplex study followed by DSA within a 30-day period. All arterial segments were graded from normal (Grade 0) to occluded (Grade 4), based on duplex interpretation and directly compared to direct visualization findings from DSA. Using statistical methods, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of DUS were determined. Results A total of 171 tibial vessel segments from 57 enrolled subjects with critical limb ischemia symptoms were analyzed in this study. The agreement between both modalities was poor (Kappa=0.19, p < 0.05), with DUS demonstrating a significant underestimation of vessel pathologies. This is also reflected by the overall sub-optimal sensitivity (23%), specificity (84%), PPV (69%), and NPV (41%) in DUS when compared to DSA results as the gold standard. Conclusion Significant disagreements were noted in this study between DUS and DSA findings, primarily significant underestimation of tibial vessel disease by the DUS when compared with the DSA. Caution is advised in the clinical application of DUS in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) symptoms and multi-segment tibial vessels due to its demonstrated limitations in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11401628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Duplex Ultrasound and Digital Subtraction Angiography for Assessing Tibial Vessel Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Rubén Neris, Ali Kimyaghalam, Kuldeep Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.7759/cureus.69327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Duplex ultrasonography (DUS) is readily available and often used as the first diagnostic test for patients with peripheral artery diseases (PADs). PAD is a disease that affects the general population but more commonly affects diabetics. To date, the role of DUS in the assessment of tibial vessel disease is inconclusive at best. The goal of our study is to assess the validity of DUS in characterizing the presence and severity of tibial diseases via comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) findings. Methods This is a single-center retrospective cohort study analyzing three arterial segments (anterior tibial, posterior tibial, and fibular arteries) in patients who received a duplex study followed by DSA within a 30-day period. All arterial segments were graded from normal (Grade 0) to occluded (Grade 4), based on duplex interpretation and directly compared to direct visualization findings from DSA. Using statistical methods, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of DUS were determined. Results A total of 171 tibial vessel segments from 57 enrolled subjects with critical limb ischemia symptoms were analyzed in this study. The agreement between both modalities was poor (Kappa=0.19, p < 0.05), with DUS demonstrating a significant underestimation of vessel pathologies. This is also reflected by the overall sub-optimal sensitivity (23%), specificity (84%), PPV (69%), and NPV (41%) in DUS when compared to DSA results as the gold standard. Conclusion Significant disagreements were noted in this study between DUS and DSA findings, primarily significant underestimation of tibial vessel disease by the DUS when compared with the DSA. Caution is advised in the clinical application of DUS in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) symptoms and multi-segment tibial vessels due to its demonstrated limitations in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cureus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11401628/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cureus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.69327\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.69327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景 双反射超声波检查(DUS)很容易获得,通常用作外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者的首次诊断检查。PAD 是一种影响普通人群的疾病,但更常见于糖尿病患者。迄今为止,DUS 在评估胫骨血管疾病中的作用充其量只能说是尚无定论。我们的研究旨在通过与数字减影血管造影(DSA)结果的比较,评估 DUS 在描述胫骨血管疾病的存在和严重程度方面的有效性。方法 这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,分析了 30 天内接受双工检查和 DSA 的患者的三个动脉段(胫前动脉、胫后动脉和腓动脉)。所有动脉段都根据双工分析结果从正常(0 级)到闭塞(4 级)进行了分级,并与 DSA 的直接显像结果进行了直接比较。使用统计方法确定了 DUS 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值 (PPV)、阴性预测值 (NPV) 和准确性。结果 本研究共分析了 57 名有严重肢体缺血症状的受试者的 171 个胫骨血管节段。两种模式之间的一致性很差(Kappa=0.19,p < 0.05),DUS 明显低估了血管的病变。与作为金标准的 DSA 结果相比,DUS 的灵敏度(23%)、特异性(84%)、PPV(69%)和 NPV(41%)均未达到最佳水平,这也反映了这一点。结论 在本研究中,DUS 和 DSA 结果之间存在显著差异,主要是 DUS 与 DSA 相比明显低估了胫骨血管疾病。由于 DUS 在本研究中的局限性,建议对有慢性肢体缺血(CLTI)症状和多节胫骨血管的患者临床应用 DUS 时要谨慎。
Comparison of Duplex Ultrasound and Digital Subtraction Angiography for Assessing Tibial Vessel Disease.
Background Duplex ultrasonography (DUS) is readily available and often used as the first diagnostic test for patients with peripheral artery diseases (PADs). PAD is a disease that affects the general population but more commonly affects diabetics. To date, the role of DUS in the assessment of tibial vessel disease is inconclusive at best. The goal of our study is to assess the validity of DUS in characterizing the presence and severity of tibial diseases via comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) findings. Methods This is a single-center retrospective cohort study analyzing three arterial segments (anterior tibial, posterior tibial, and fibular arteries) in patients who received a duplex study followed by DSA within a 30-day period. All arterial segments were graded from normal (Grade 0) to occluded (Grade 4), based on duplex interpretation and directly compared to direct visualization findings from DSA. Using statistical methods, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of DUS were determined. Results A total of 171 tibial vessel segments from 57 enrolled subjects with critical limb ischemia symptoms were analyzed in this study. The agreement between both modalities was poor (Kappa=0.19, p < 0.05), with DUS demonstrating a significant underestimation of vessel pathologies. This is also reflected by the overall sub-optimal sensitivity (23%), specificity (84%), PPV (69%), and NPV (41%) in DUS when compared to DSA results as the gold standard. Conclusion Significant disagreements were noted in this study between DUS and DSA findings, primarily significant underestimation of tibial vessel disease by the DUS when compared with the DSA. Caution is advised in the clinical application of DUS in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) symptoms and multi-segment tibial vessels due to its demonstrated limitations in this study.