Rachel Scott, Samuel D. Chumbley, Maria Miles, Clodagh Beattie, Anive Grewal
{"title":"待命模拟:评估成本和影响。","authors":"Rachel Scott, Samuel D. Chumbley, Maria Miles, Clodagh Beattie, Anive Grewal","doi":"10.1111/tct.13807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>On-call simulation has been shown to improve the confidence of prospective junior doctors in undertaking on-call shifts. Despite this, it is not mandated in UK medical school curricula, leading to variations in provision. Barriers to widespread implementation may include doubts surrounding effectiveness, feasibility of delivering on-call simulation across multiple sites and unknown costs. To address these gaps in the literature, we designed and implemented a multi-site on-call simulation programme. We aimed to evaluate it both educationally, using student preparedness to complete on-call shifts as our outcome, and economically, by performing a cost-outcome description.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>An on-call simulation programme, ‘Bleep 101’, was developed and implemented at eight hospitals. Students were ‘bleeped’ around a circuit of written scenarios including clinical emergencies, prescribing and distractor tasks. Students could escalate to their facilitator on the phone for advice at any time. Sessions concluded with a 30-minute debrief focusing on prioritisation and communication skills.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>Between 2018 and 2023, 217 students took part and completed feedback forms. Post-session feedback using Likert scales demonstrated a significant increase in preparedness to complete an on-call shift (pre-4/10, post-7/10, p < 0.01) with outcomes consistent across sites. A cohort of 20 students completed paired pre- and post-session feedback to evaluate the impact of the session on specific skills. This demonstrated increased confidence in using a bleep, prioritisation, gathering information and handing over. The costs of implementation at one site were reported, demonstrating a cost of £1.99/student/year or £99.48/student/year excluding costs saved by volunteers and room hire.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>This study indicates that on-call simulation can be delivered at a low cost using existing medical education infrastructure within hospitals. Results suggested an improvement in medical students' preparedness for on-call practice. We therefore recommend on-call simulation be available to all medical students as part of medical school curricula.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"21 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.13807","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On-call simulation: Evaluating cost and impact\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Scott, Samuel D. Chumbley, Maria Miles, Clodagh Beattie, Anive Grewal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tct.13807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>On-call simulation has been shown to improve the confidence of prospective junior doctors in undertaking on-call shifts. Despite this, it is not mandated in UK medical school curricula, leading to variations in provision. Barriers to widespread implementation may include doubts surrounding effectiveness, feasibility of delivering on-call simulation across multiple sites and unknown costs. To address these gaps in the literature, we designed and implemented a multi-site on-call simulation programme. We aimed to evaluate it both educationally, using student preparedness to complete on-call shifts as our outcome, and economically, by performing a cost-outcome description.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Approach</h3>\\n \\n <p>An on-call simulation programme, ‘Bleep 101’, was developed and implemented at eight hospitals. Students were ‘bleeped’ around a circuit of written scenarios including clinical emergencies, prescribing and distractor tasks. Students could escalate to their facilitator on the phone for advice at any time. Sessions concluded with a 30-minute debrief focusing on prioritisation and communication skills.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\\n \\n <p>Between 2018 and 2023, 217 students took part and completed feedback forms. Post-session feedback using Likert scales demonstrated a significant increase in preparedness to complete an on-call shift (pre-4/10, post-7/10, p < 0.01) with outcomes consistent across sites. A cohort of 20 students completed paired pre- and post-session feedback to evaluate the impact of the session on specific skills. This demonstrated increased confidence in using a bleep, prioritisation, gathering information and handing over. The costs of implementation at one site were reported, demonstrating a cost of £1.99/student/year or £99.48/student/year excluding costs saved by volunteers and room hire.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study indicates that on-call simulation can be delivered at a low cost using existing medical education infrastructure within hospitals. Results suggested an improvement in medical students' preparedness for on-call practice. We therefore recommend on-call simulation be available to all medical students as part of medical school curricula.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"volume\":\"21 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.13807\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.13807\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.13807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
On-call simulation has been shown to improve the confidence of prospective junior doctors in undertaking on-call shifts. Despite this, it is not mandated in UK medical school curricula, leading to variations in provision. Barriers to widespread implementation may include doubts surrounding effectiveness, feasibility of delivering on-call simulation across multiple sites and unknown costs. To address these gaps in the literature, we designed and implemented a multi-site on-call simulation programme. We aimed to evaluate it both educationally, using student preparedness to complete on-call shifts as our outcome, and economically, by performing a cost-outcome description.
Approach
An on-call simulation programme, ‘Bleep 101’, was developed and implemented at eight hospitals. Students were ‘bleeped’ around a circuit of written scenarios including clinical emergencies, prescribing and distractor tasks. Students could escalate to their facilitator on the phone for advice at any time. Sessions concluded with a 30-minute debrief focusing on prioritisation and communication skills.
Evaluation
Between 2018 and 2023, 217 students took part and completed feedback forms. Post-session feedback using Likert scales demonstrated a significant increase in preparedness to complete an on-call shift (pre-4/10, post-7/10, p < 0.01) with outcomes consistent across sites. A cohort of 20 students completed paired pre- and post-session feedback to evaluate the impact of the session on specific skills. This demonstrated increased confidence in using a bleep, prioritisation, gathering information and handing over. The costs of implementation at one site were reported, demonstrating a cost of £1.99/student/year or £99.48/student/year excluding costs saved by volunteers and room hire.
Implications
This study indicates that on-call simulation can be delivered at a low cost using existing medical education infrastructure within hospitals. Results suggested an improvement in medical students' preparedness for on-call practice. We therefore recommend on-call simulation be available to all medical students as part of medical school curricula.
期刊介绍:
The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.