Prerna G Arora, Kayla Parr, Kayla Staubi, Aaron Soo Ping Chow, Veronica Coriano, Courtney N Baker
{"title":"开发文化适应内容核对表:针对少数种族和少数族裔青少年的循证心理干预措施的文化适应性测量。","authors":"Prerna G Arora, Kayla Parr, Kayla Staubi, Aaron Soo Ping Chow, Veronica Coriano, Courtney N Baker","doi":"10.1037/spq0000651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disparities in mental health need and service use among racial and ethnic minoritized (REM) youth remain a pervasive public health concern in the United States. Cultural adaptations (CAs) have been put forth as a way to increase the cultural and contextual relevance of evidence-based psychological interventions (EBIs) to improve treatment outcomes among REM youth. Currently, no measure of CAs to EBIs for REM youth in the United States exists in the literature. Using a multistage method, this study sought to develop such a tool, the Cultural Adaptations Content Checklist (CACC). In a previous foundational study conducted via a systematic literature review, authors identified a comprehensive list of existing CAs. In the first two stages, we used a modified Delphi method as a part of which expert practice and research stakeholders (<i>N</i> = 17) provided feedback on CA types, definitions, and groupings via survey methodology. In the third stage, we conducted cognitive interviews with a subset of participants (<i>n</i> = 10) to assess participant comprehension of the CACC. The final CACC was developed and consists of 36 CA types organized into eight groups. Implications for use of the CACC in research and practice are presented. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74763,"journal":{"name":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the Cultural Adaptations Content Checklist: Measuring cultural adaptations to evidence-based psychological interventions for racial and ethnic minoritized youth.\",\"authors\":\"Prerna G Arora, Kayla Parr, Kayla Staubi, Aaron Soo Ping Chow, Veronica Coriano, Courtney N Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/spq0000651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Disparities in mental health need and service use among racial and ethnic minoritized (REM) youth remain a pervasive public health concern in the United States. Cultural adaptations (CAs) have been put forth as a way to increase the cultural and contextual relevance of evidence-based psychological interventions (EBIs) to improve treatment outcomes among REM youth. Currently, no measure of CAs to EBIs for REM youth in the United States exists in the literature. Using a multistage method, this study sought to develop such a tool, the Cultural Adaptations Content Checklist (CACC). In a previous foundational study conducted via a systematic literature review, authors identified a comprehensive list of existing CAs. In the first two stages, we used a modified Delphi method as a part of which expert practice and research stakeholders (<i>N</i> = 17) provided feedback on CA types, definitions, and groupings via survey methodology. In the third stage, we conducted cognitive interviews with a subset of participants (<i>n</i> = 10) to assess participant comprehension of the CACC. The final CACC was developed and consists of 36 CA types organized into eight groups. Implications for use of the CACC in research and practice are presented. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000651\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在美国,少数种族和族裔(REM)青少年在心理健康需求和服务使用方面的差异仍然是一个普遍的公共卫生问题。文化适应(CAs)被认为是提高循证心理干预(EBIs)的文化和背景相关性以改善 REM 青少年治疗效果的一种方法。目前,文献中还没有针对美国 REM 青少年的循证心理干预的文化适应性的衡量标准。本研究采用多阶段方法,试图开发这样一种工具--文化适应内容核对表(CACC)。在之前通过系统性文献回顾进行的一项基础研究中,作者确定了一份现有文化适应内容的综合清单。在前两个阶段,我们使用了经过修改的德尔菲法,其中专家实践和研究利益相关者(N = 17)通过调查方法提供了关于 CA 类型、定义和分组的反馈意见。在第三阶段,我们对一部分参与者(10 人)进行了认知访谈,以评估参与者对 CACC 的理解。最终开发出的 CACC 包含 36 种 CA 类型,分为 8 组。本文介绍了在研究和实践中使用 CACC 的意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
Development of the Cultural Adaptations Content Checklist: Measuring cultural adaptations to evidence-based psychological interventions for racial and ethnic minoritized youth.
Disparities in mental health need and service use among racial and ethnic minoritized (REM) youth remain a pervasive public health concern in the United States. Cultural adaptations (CAs) have been put forth as a way to increase the cultural and contextual relevance of evidence-based psychological interventions (EBIs) to improve treatment outcomes among REM youth. Currently, no measure of CAs to EBIs for REM youth in the United States exists in the literature. Using a multistage method, this study sought to develop such a tool, the Cultural Adaptations Content Checklist (CACC). In a previous foundational study conducted via a systematic literature review, authors identified a comprehensive list of existing CAs. In the first two stages, we used a modified Delphi method as a part of which expert practice and research stakeholders (N = 17) provided feedback on CA types, definitions, and groupings via survey methodology. In the third stage, we conducted cognitive interviews with a subset of participants (n = 10) to assess participant comprehension of the CACC. The final CACC was developed and consists of 36 CA types organized into eight groups. Implications for use of the CACC in research and practice are presented. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).