[重症监护医学中的伦理边界决定]。

Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1007/s00108-024-01781-5
Benedikt Florian Scherr, Philipp Karl Buehler
{"title":"[重症监护医学中的伦理边界决定]。","authors":"Benedikt Florian Scherr, Philipp Karl Buehler","doi":"10.1007/s00108-024-01781-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ethical decision-making is a cornerstone of intensive care and emergency medicine. In acute scenarios, clinicians often face rapid, high-stakes decisions concerning life and death, made more challenging by time constraints and incomplete information. These decisions are further complicated by economic constraints, limited resources, and evolving technological capabilities.</p><p><strong>Question: </strong>What decision-making aids and factors can be employed in ethical borderline cases within intensive care medicine?</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fundamental ethical principles such as patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice form the basis for medical treatment decisions. Evaluating the patient's will through advanced directives or proxy consensus is crucial, although advanced directives can be ambiguous. Assessing quality of life is increasingly important, with instruments such as the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) being utilized. For older patients, a holistic approach is recommended, focusing on overall health rather than chronological age. In patients with advanced underlying diseases, a multidisciplinary dialogue is essential.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Decision-making in intensive care medicine requires careful consideration of medical, ethical, and individual factors. Despite advances in artificial intelligence and prognostic models, human judgment remains crucial. During periods of resource scarcity, ethically sound triage protocols are required. The challenge lies in applying these principles and factors in clinical practice while respecting the individuality of each patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":73385,"journal":{"name":"Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"967-975"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Ethical boundary decisions in intensive care medicine].\",\"authors\":\"Benedikt Florian Scherr, Philipp Karl Buehler\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00108-024-01781-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ethical decision-making is a cornerstone of intensive care and emergency medicine. In acute scenarios, clinicians often face rapid, high-stakes decisions concerning life and death, made more challenging by time constraints and incomplete information. These decisions are further complicated by economic constraints, limited resources, and evolving technological capabilities.</p><p><strong>Question: </strong>What decision-making aids and factors can be employed in ethical borderline cases within intensive care medicine?</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fundamental ethical principles such as patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice form the basis for medical treatment decisions. Evaluating the patient's will through advanced directives or proxy consensus is crucial, although advanced directives can be ambiguous. Assessing quality of life is increasingly important, with instruments such as the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) being utilized. For older patients, a holistic approach is recommended, focusing on overall health rather than chronological age. In patients with advanced underlying diseases, a multidisciplinary dialogue is essential.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Decision-making in intensive care medicine requires careful consideration of medical, ethical, and individual factors. Despite advances in artificial intelligence and prognostic models, human judgment remains crucial. During periods of resource scarcity, ethically sound triage protocols are required. The challenge lies in applying these principles and factors in clinical practice while respecting the individuality of each patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"967-975\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452514/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-024-01781-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-024-01781-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:伦理决策是重症监护和急诊医学的基石。在急诊情况下,临床医生经常要迅速做出关乎生死的重大决策,而时间紧迫和信息不全使决策变得更具挑战性。经济限制、有限的资源和不断发展的技术能力使这些决策变得更加复杂:在重症监护医学中,哪些决策辅助工具和因素可用于伦理边缘病例?患者自主、受益、非恶意和公正等基本伦理原则是医疗决策的基础。通过预先指示或代理共识来评估病人的意愿至关重要,尽管预先指示可能含糊不清。评估生活质量越来越重要,临床虚弱量表(CFS)等工具也得到了应用。对于老年患者,建议采用综合方法,重点关注整体健康而非实际年龄。对于患有晚期基础疾病的患者,多学科对话至关重要:重症监护医学中的决策制定需要仔细考虑医疗、伦理和个人因素。尽管人工智能和预后模型取得了进步,但人的判断仍然至关重要。在资源稀缺时期,需要制定符合伦理的分流方案。挑战在于如何在临床实践中应用这些原则和因素,同时尊重每个病人的个性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Ethical boundary decisions in intensive care medicine].

Background: Ethical decision-making is a cornerstone of intensive care and emergency medicine. In acute scenarios, clinicians often face rapid, high-stakes decisions concerning life and death, made more challenging by time constraints and incomplete information. These decisions are further complicated by economic constraints, limited resources, and evolving technological capabilities.

Question: What decision-making aids and factors can be employed in ethical borderline cases within intensive care medicine?

Results: Fundamental ethical principles such as patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice form the basis for medical treatment decisions. Evaluating the patient's will through advanced directives or proxy consensus is crucial, although advanced directives can be ambiguous. Assessing quality of life is increasingly important, with instruments such as the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) being utilized. For older patients, a holistic approach is recommended, focusing on overall health rather than chronological age. In patients with advanced underlying diseases, a multidisciplinary dialogue is essential.

Discussion: Decision-making in intensive care medicine requires careful consideration of medical, ethical, and individual factors. Despite advances in artificial intelligence and prognostic models, human judgment remains crucial. During periods of resource scarcity, ethically sound triage protocols are required. The challenge lies in applying these principles and factors in clinical practice while respecting the individuality of each patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信