人类成纤维细胞衰老的系统转录组分析和时间模型。

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Frontiers in aging Pub Date : 2024-08-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fragi.2024.1448543
R-L Scanlan, L Pease, H O'Keefe, A Martinez-Guimera, L Rasmussen, J Wordsworth, D Shanley
{"title":"人类成纤维细胞衰老的系统转录组分析和时间模型。","authors":"R-L Scanlan, L Pease, H O'Keefe, A Martinez-Guimera, L Rasmussen, J Wordsworth, D Shanley","doi":"10.3389/fragi.2024.1448543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cellular senescence is a diverse phenotype characterised by permanent cell cycle arrest and an associated secretory phenotype (SASP) which includes inflammatory cytokines. Typically, senescent cells are removed by the immune system, but this process becomes dysregulated with age causing senescent cells to accumulate and induce chronic inflammatory signalling. Identifying senescent cells is challenging due to senescence phenotype heterogeneity, and senotherapy often requires a combinatorial approach. Here we systematically collected 119 transcriptomic datasets related to human fibroblasts, forming an online database describing the relevant variables for each study allowing users to filter for variables and genes of interest. Our own analysis of the database identified 28 genes significantly up- or downregulated across four senescence types (DNA damage induced senescence (DDIS), oncogene induced senescence (OIS), replicative senescence, and bystander induced senescence) compared to proliferating controls. We also found gene expression patterns of conventional senescence markers were highly specific and reliable for different senescence inducers, cell lines, and timepoints. Our comprehensive data supported several observations made in existing studies using single datasets, including stronger p53 signalling in DDIS compared to OIS. However, contrary to some early observations, both p16 and p21 mRNA levels rise quickly, depending on senescence type, and persist for at least 8-11 days. Additionally, little evidence was found to support an initial TGFβ-centric SASP. To support our transcriptomic analysis, we computationally modelled temporal protein changes of select core senescence proteins during DDIS and OIS, as well as perform knockdown interventions. We conclude that while universal biomarkers of senescence are difficult to identify, conventional senescence markers follow predictable profiles and construction of a framework for studying senescence could lead to more reproducible data and understanding of senescence heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":73061,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11390594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic transcriptomic analysis and temporal modelling of human fibroblast senescence.\",\"authors\":\"R-L Scanlan, L Pease, H O'Keefe, A Martinez-Guimera, L Rasmussen, J Wordsworth, D Shanley\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fragi.2024.1448543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cellular senescence is a diverse phenotype characterised by permanent cell cycle arrest and an associated secretory phenotype (SASP) which includes inflammatory cytokines. Typically, senescent cells are removed by the immune system, but this process becomes dysregulated with age causing senescent cells to accumulate and induce chronic inflammatory signalling. Identifying senescent cells is challenging due to senescence phenotype heterogeneity, and senotherapy often requires a combinatorial approach. Here we systematically collected 119 transcriptomic datasets related to human fibroblasts, forming an online database describing the relevant variables for each study allowing users to filter for variables and genes of interest. Our own analysis of the database identified 28 genes significantly up- or downregulated across four senescence types (DNA damage induced senescence (DDIS), oncogene induced senescence (OIS), replicative senescence, and bystander induced senescence) compared to proliferating controls. We also found gene expression patterns of conventional senescence markers were highly specific and reliable for different senescence inducers, cell lines, and timepoints. Our comprehensive data supported several observations made in existing studies using single datasets, including stronger p53 signalling in DDIS compared to OIS. However, contrary to some early observations, both p16 and p21 mRNA levels rise quickly, depending on senescence type, and persist for at least 8-11 days. Additionally, little evidence was found to support an initial TGFβ-centric SASP. To support our transcriptomic analysis, we computationally modelled temporal protein changes of select core senescence proteins during DDIS and OIS, as well as perform knockdown interventions. We conclude that while universal biomarkers of senescence are difficult to identify, conventional senescence markers follow predictable profiles and construction of a framework for studying senescence could lead to more reproducible data and understanding of senescence heterogeneity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in aging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11390594/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2024.1448543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2024.1448543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

细胞衰老是一种多样化的表型,其特征是细胞周期永久停滞和相关分泌表型(SASP),其中包括炎症细胞因子。通常情况下,衰老细胞会被免疫系统清除,但随着年龄的增长,这一过程会变得失调,导致衰老细胞积聚并诱发慢性炎症信号。由于衰老表型的异质性,识别衰老细胞具有挑战性,而衰老疗法通常需要一种组合方法。在这里,我们系统地收集了 119 个与人类成纤维细胞相关的转录组数据集,并形成了一个在线数据库,其中描述了每项研究的相关变量,允许用户筛选感兴趣的变量和基因。我们自己对数据库进行了分析,发现与增殖对照组相比,四种衰老类型(DNA损伤诱导衰老(DDIS)、癌基因诱导衰老(OIS)、复制衰老和旁观者诱导衰老)中有28个基因明显上调或下调。我们还发现,对于不同的衰老诱导剂、细胞系和时间点,传统衰老标记物的基因表达模式具有高度的特异性和可靠性。我们的综合数据支持了现有研究中使用单一数据集得出的一些观察结果,包括 DDIS 与 OIS 相比,p53 信号更强。然而,与早期的一些观察结果相反,p16 和 p21 mRNA 水平上升很快,这取决于衰老类型,并至少持续 8-11 天。此外,几乎没有证据表明最初的 SASP 是以 TGFβ 为中心的。为了支持我们的转录组分析,我们通过计算模拟了 DDIS 和 OIS 期间某些核心衰老蛋白的时间变化,并进行了基因敲除干预。我们的结论是,虽然衰老的通用生物标志物难以确定,但传统的衰老标志物遵循可预测的特征,构建一个研究衰老的框架可以获得更多可重复的数据,并了解衰老的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic transcriptomic analysis and temporal modelling of human fibroblast senescence.

Cellular senescence is a diverse phenotype characterised by permanent cell cycle arrest and an associated secretory phenotype (SASP) which includes inflammatory cytokines. Typically, senescent cells are removed by the immune system, but this process becomes dysregulated with age causing senescent cells to accumulate and induce chronic inflammatory signalling. Identifying senescent cells is challenging due to senescence phenotype heterogeneity, and senotherapy often requires a combinatorial approach. Here we systematically collected 119 transcriptomic datasets related to human fibroblasts, forming an online database describing the relevant variables for each study allowing users to filter for variables and genes of interest. Our own analysis of the database identified 28 genes significantly up- or downregulated across four senescence types (DNA damage induced senescence (DDIS), oncogene induced senescence (OIS), replicative senescence, and bystander induced senescence) compared to proliferating controls. We also found gene expression patterns of conventional senescence markers were highly specific and reliable for different senescence inducers, cell lines, and timepoints. Our comprehensive data supported several observations made in existing studies using single datasets, including stronger p53 signalling in DDIS compared to OIS. However, contrary to some early observations, both p16 and p21 mRNA levels rise quickly, depending on senescence type, and persist for at least 8-11 days. Additionally, little evidence was found to support an initial TGFβ-centric SASP. To support our transcriptomic analysis, we computationally modelled temporal protein changes of select core senescence proteins during DDIS and OIS, as well as perform knockdown interventions. We conclude that while universal biomarkers of senescence are difficult to identify, conventional senescence markers follow predictable profiles and construction of a framework for studying senescence could lead to more reproducible data and understanding of senescence heterogeneity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信