利益相关者对数据监测委员会当前问题的看法。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Michael J. Cartwright, Tim Friede, David Lawrence, Emma May, Tobias Mütze, Kit Roes
{"title":"利益相关者对数据监测委员会当前问题的看法。","authors":"Michael J. Cartwright,&nbsp;Tim Friede,&nbsp;David Lawrence,&nbsp;Emma May,&nbsp;Tobias Mütze,&nbsp;Kit Roes","doi":"10.1002/bimj.202300384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Data Monitoring Committees (DMCs) are groups of experts that review accumulating data from one or more ongoing clinical studies and advise the Sponsor regarding the continuing safety of study subjects along with the continuing validity and scientific merit of the study. Although DMCs are widely used, considerable variability exists in their conduct. This paper offers recommendations, derived from sessions given at the 2023 Central European Network International Biometric and Statisticians in the Pharmaceutical Industry Conferences' and the authors' experiences. We focus on four topics that are part of the DMC process and where there is unclarity and inconsistency in current practices: (1) Communication with the DMC—We reflect on the importance of effective, proper communication channels between the DMC and relevant stakeholders to foster collaboration and exchange of critical information while retaining study integrity throughout. (2) Open sessions—We discuss the benefits of incorporating open sessions in DMC meetings to enhance transparency, inclusivity, and the consideration of diverse perspectives, as well as pitfalls of open sessions. (3) Access to efficacy data—We highlight the need for appropriate access to efficacy data by DMCs and discuss how to implement this in practice and how to address potential concerns regarding multiplicity. (4) Interactive data displays—We outline the utilization of interactive data displays to facilitate a more intuitive understanding of study results by the DMC. By addressing these topics, we aim to provide comprehensive practical recommendations that bridge the gap between current practices and optimal DMC functionality.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stakeholders' Perspectives on Current Issues in Data Monitoring Committees\",\"authors\":\"Michael J. Cartwright,&nbsp;Tim Friede,&nbsp;David Lawrence,&nbsp;Emma May,&nbsp;Tobias Mütze,&nbsp;Kit Roes\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bimj.202300384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Data Monitoring Committees (DMCs) are groups of experts that review accumulating data from one or more ongoing clinical studies and advise the Sponsor regarding the continuing safety of study subjects along with the continuing validity and scientific merit of the study. Although DMCs are widely used, considerable variability exists in their conduct. This paper offers recommendations, derived from sessions given at the 2023 Central European Network International Biometric and Statisticians in the Pharmaceutical Industry Conferences' and the authors' experiences. We focus on four topics that are part of the DMC process and where there is unclarity and inconsistency in current practices: (1) Communication with the DMC—We reflect on the importance of effective, proper communication channels between the DMC and relevant stakeholders to foster collaboration and exchange of critical information while retaining study integrity throughout. (2) Open sessions—We discuss the benefits of incorporating open sessions in DMC meetings to enhance transparency, inclusivity, and the consideration of diverse perspectives, as well as pitfalls of open sessions. (3) Access to efficacy data—We highlight the need for appropriate access to efficacy data by DMCs and discuss how to implement this in practice and how to address potential concerns regarding multiplicity. (4) Interactive data displays—We outline the utilization of interactive data displays to facilitate a more intuitive understanding of study results by the DMC. By addressing these topics, we aim to provide comprehensive practical recommendations that bridge the gap between current practices and optimal DMC functionality.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.202300384\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.202300384","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数据监测委员会(DMC)是由专家组成的小组,负责审查一项或多项正在进行的临床研究的累积数据,并就研究对象的持续安全性以及研究的持续有效性和科学价值向申办方提供建议。尽管 DMC 被广泛使用,但其行为方式存在相当大的差异。本文根据 2023 年中欧网络国际制药业生物计量和统计学家会议上的发言和作者的经验提出建议。我们重点讨论了 DMC 流程中的四个主题,以及当前实践中存在的不清晰和不一致之处:(1)与 DMC 的沟通--我们思考了 DMC 与相关利益方之间有效、适当的沟通渠道的重要性,以促进合作和重要信息的交流,同时在整个过程中保持研究的完整性。(2) 公开会议--我们讨论了将公开会议纳入 DMC 会议以提高透明度、包容性和考虑不同观点的好处,以及公开会议的缺陷。(3) 获取疗效数据--我们强调了区管会适当获取疗效数据的必要性,并讨论了如何在实践中落实这一点,以及如何解决潜在的多重性问题。(4) 交互式数据显示--我们概述了如何利用交互式数据显示来帮助 DMC 更直观地了解研究结果。通过讨论这些主题,我们旨在提供全面实用的建议,缩小当前实践与最佳 DMC 功能之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stakeholders' Perspectives on Current Issues in Data Monitoring Committees

Data Monitoring Committees (DMCs) are groups of experts that review accumulating data from one or more ongoing clinical studies and advise the Sponsor regarding the continuing safety of study subjects along with the continuing validity and scientific merit of the study. Although DMCs are widely used, considerable variability exists in their conduct. This paper offers recommendations, derived from sessions given at the 2023 Central European Network International Biometric and Statisticians in the Pharmaceutical Industry Conferences' and the authors' experiences. We focus on four topics that are part of the DMC process and where there is unclarity and inconsistency in current practices: (1) Communication with the DMC—We reflect on the importance of effective, proper communication channels between the DMC and relevant stakeholders to foster collaboration and exchange of critical information while retaining study integrity throughout. (2) Open sessions—We discuss the benefits of incorporating open sessions in DMC meetings to enhance transparency, inclusivity, and the consideration of diverse perspectives, as well as pitfalls of open sessions. (3) Access to efficacy data—We highlight the need for appropriate access to efficacy data by DMCs and discuss how to implement this in practice and how to address potential concerns regarding multiplicity. (4) Interactive data displays—We outline the utilization of interactive data displays to facilitate a more intuitive understanding of study results by the DMC. By addressing these topics, we aim to provide comprehensive practical recommendations that bridge the gap between current practices and optimal DMC functionality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信