精神科急诊就诊后的虚拟随访与亲自随访:一项基于人群的队列研究。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Matthew Crocker, Anjie Huang, Kinwah Fung, Therese A Stukel, Alene Toulany, Natasha Saunders, Paul Kurdyak, Lucy C Barker, Tanya S Hauck, Martin Rotenberg, Emily Hamovitch, Simone N Vigod
{"title":"精神科急诊就诊后的虚拟随访与亲自随访:一项基于人群的队列研究。","authors":"Matthew Crocker, Anjie Huang, Kinwah Fung, Therese A Stukel, Alene Toulany, Natasha Saunders, Paul Kurdyak, Lucy C Barker, Tanya S Hauck, Martin Rotenberg, Emily Hamovitch, Simone N Vigod","doi":"10.1177/07067437241281068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>With increased utilization of virtual care in mental health, examining its appropriateness in various clinical scenarios is warranted. This study aimed to compare the risk of adverse psychiatric outcomes following virtual versus in-person mental health follow-up care after a psychiatric emergency department (ED) visit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using population-based health administrative data in Ontario (2021), we identified 28,232 adults discharged from a psychiatric ED visit who had a follow-up mental health visit within 14 days postdischarge. We compared those whose first follow-up visit was virtual (telephone or video) versus in-person on their risk for experiencing either a repeat psychiatric ED visit, psychiatric hospitalization, intentional self-injury, or suicide in the 15-90 days post-ED visit. Cox proportional hazard models generated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for age, income quintile, psychiatric hospitalization, and intentional self-injury in the 2 years prior to ED visit. We stratified by sex and diagnosis at index ED visits based on the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Canada (ICD-10-CA) coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 65% (<i>n</i> = 18,354) of first follow-up visits were virtual, while 35% (<i>n</i> = 9,878) were in-person. About 13.9% and 14.6% of the virtual and in-person groups, respectively, experienced the composite outcome, corresponding to incidence rates of 60.9 versus 74.2 per 1000 person-years (aHR 0.95, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.01). Results were similar for individual elements of the composite outcome, when stratifying by sex and index psychiatric diagnosis, when varying exposure (7 days) and outcome periods (60 and 30 days), and comparing \"only\" virtual versus \"any\" in-person follow-up during the 14-day follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>These results support virtual care as a modality to increase access to follow-up after an acute care psychiatric encounter across a wide range of diagnoses. Prospective trials to discern whether this is due to the comparable efficacy of virtual and in-person care, or due solely to appropriate patient selection may be warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual Versus In-Person Follow-up After a Psychiatric Emergency Visit: A Population-Based Cohort Study: Suivi virtuel opposé à en personne après une visite à l'urgence psychiatrique : une étude de cohorte dans la population.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Crocker, Anjie Huang, Kinwah Fung, Therese A Stukel, Alene Toulany, Natasha Saunders, Paul Kurdyak, Lucy C Barker, Tanya S Hauck, Martin Rotenberg, Emily Hamovitch, Simone N Vigod\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07067437241281068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>With increased utilization of virtual care in mental health, examining its appropriateness in various clinical scenarios is warranted. This study aimed to compare the risk of adverse psychiatric outcomes following virtual versus in-person mental health follow-up care after a psychiatric emergency department (ED) visit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using population-based health administrative data in Ontario (2021), we identified 28,232 adults discharged from a psychiatric ED visit who had a follow-up mental health visit within 14 days postdischarge. We compared those whose first follow-up visit was virtual (telephone or video) versus in-person on their risk for experiencing either a repeat psychiatric ED visit, psychiatric hospitalization, intentional self-injury, or suicide in the 15-90 days post-ED visit. Cox proportional hazard models generated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for age, income quintile, psychiatric hospitalization, and intentional self-injury in the 2 years prior to ED visit. We stratified by sex and diagnosis at index ED visits based on the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Canada (ICD-10-CA) coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 65% (<i>n</i> = 18,354) of first follow-up visits were virtual, while 35% (<i>n</i> = 9,878) were in-person. About 13.9% and 14.6% of the virtual and in-person groups, respectively, experienced the composite outcome, corresponding to incidence rates of 60.9 versus 74.2 per 1000 person-years (aHR 0.95, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.01). Results were similar for individual elements of the composite outcome, when stratifying by sex and index psychiatric diagnosis, when varying exposure (7 days) and outcome periods (60 and 30 days), and comparing \\\"only\\\" virtual versus \\\"any\\\" in-person follow-up during the 14-day follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>These results support virtual care as a modality to increase access to follow-up after an acute care psychiatric encounter across a wide range of diagnoses. Prospective trials to discern whether this is due to the comparable efficacy of virtual and in-person care, or due solely to appropriate patient selection may be warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562897/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437241281068\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437241281068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:随着虚拟医疗在心理健康领域的应用越来越广泛,有必要对其在各种临床场景中的适用性进行研究。本研究旨在比较在精神科急诊室(ED)就诊后,接受虚拟精神健康随访护理与亲自接受精神健康随访护理后出现不良精神结果的风险:利用安大略省(2021 年)基于人口的健康管理数据,我们确定了 28232 名从精神科急诊出院的成年人,他们在出院后 14 天内接受了精神健康随访。我们比较了首次复诊为虚拟(电话或视频)与面对面的患者在出院后 15-90 天内再次出现精神科急诊就诊、精神科住院、故意自伤或自杀的风险。根据年龄、收入五分位数、精神科住院情况以及就诊前 2 年内的故意自伤情况进行调整后,Cox 比例危险模型得出了调整后的危险比 (aHR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI)。我们根据《国际疾病和相关健康问题分类》第 10 次修订版(ICD-10-CA,加拿大)的编码对指数急诊就医时的性别和诊断进行了分层:约 65% 的首次随访(n = 18,354 人)为虚拟随访,35% 的首次随访(n = 9,878 人)为面对面随访。虚拟组和现场组中分别约有 13.9% 和 14.6% 的人出现了综合结果,对应的发病率分别为每千人年 60.9 例和 74.2 例(aHR 0.95,95% CI 0.89 至 1.01)。当按性别和精神病诊断指标进行分层时,当改变暴露期(7 天)和结果期(60 天和 30 天)时,以及在 14 天随访期间比较 "仅 "虚拟随访与 "任何 "面对面随访时,综合结果的各个要素的结果相似:这些结果支持将虚拟治疗作为一种模式,以增加急性精神病治疗后的随访机会,适用于各种诊断。可能需要进行前瞻性试验,以确定这是由于虚拟护理和面对面护理的疗效相当,还是仅仅由于选择了适当的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtual Versus In-Person Follow-up After a Psychiatric Emergency Visit: A Population-Based Cohort Study: Suivi virtuel opposé à en personne après une visite à l'urgence psychiatrique : une étude de cohorte dans la population.

Objective: With increased utilization of virtual care in mental health, examining its appropriateness in various clinical scenarios is warranted. This study aimed to compare the risk of adverse psychiatric outcomes following virtual versus in-person mental health follow-up care after a psychiatric emergency department (ED) visit.

Methods: Using population-based health administrative data in Ontario (2021), we identified 28,232 adults discharged from a psychiatric ED visit who had a follow-up mental health visit within 14 days postdischarge. We compared those whose first follow-up visit was virtual (telephone or video) versus in-person on their risk for experiencing either a repeat psychiatric ED visit, psychiatric hospitalization, intentional self-injury, or suicide in the 15-90 days post-ED visit. Cox proportional hazard models generated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for age, income quintile, psychiatric hospitalization, and intentional self-injury in the 2 years prior to ED visit. We stratified by sex and diagnosis at index ED visits based on the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Canada (ICD-10-CA) coding.

Results: About 65% (n = 18,354) of first follow-up visits were virtual, while 35% (n = 9,878) were in-person. About 13.9% and 14.6% of the virtual and in-person groups, respectively, experienced the composite outcome, corresponding to incidence rates of 60.9 versus 74.2 per 1000 person-years (aHR 0.95, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.01). Results were similar for individual elements of the composite outcome, when stratifying by sex and index psychiatric diagnosis, when varying exposure (7 days) and outcome periods (60 and 30 days), and comparing "only" virtual versus "any" in-person follow-up during the 14-day follow-up.

Conclusions and relevance: These results support virtual care as a modality to increase access to follow-up after an acute care psychiatric encounter across a wide range of diagnoses. Prospective trials to discern whether this is due to the comparable efficacy of virtual and in-person care, or due solely to appropriate patient selection may be warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信