在狗的数量辨别任务中,积极的语调会增加对较小奖励的感知价值。

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Erin N Colbert-White, Devin C Anderson, Matthew Q Maus
{"title":"在狗的数量辨别任务中,积极的语调会增加对较小奖励的感知价值。","authors":"Erin N Colbert-White, Devin C Anderson, Matthew Q Maus","doi":"10.1037/com0000392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Like many other species, dogs have a natural quantity judgment system to assist with decision making to maximize resources. Additionally, dogs are highly sensitive to, and influenced by, human-delivered ostensive (i.e., social) cues. Here, we assessed the influence of one such cue-a high, rising, positive \"Oooh!\" sound-on dogs' choice of differing quantities of pieces of food presented on two different plates. Subjects (<i>N</i> = 29) received 16 randomized trials of four conditions: 1 versus 1 paired with experimenter \"Oooh!\" while looking at the one plate, 1 versus 3, 3 versus 1 paired with experimenter \"Oooh!,\" and 1 versus 1. As predicted, dogs chose the larger quantity more often in 1 versus 3 conditions. Contrary to one of our predictions, subjects chose the 1 versus 1+ \"Oooh!\" at chance levels. However, in support of another prediction, pairing the smaller reward with a positive intonation in 3 versus 1+ \"Oooh!\" significantly reduced dogs' choice of the larger reward. That is to say, without the presence of words, eye contact, or facial expressions, dogs followed a misguiding cue and chose a smaller reward that a stranger had deemed more valuable than a larger one. Local enhancement as well as a drive to increase social capital with the human are discussed as possible explanations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Positive intonation increases the perceived value of smaller rewards in a quantity discrimination task with dogs (Canis familiaris).\",\"authors\":\"Erin N Colbert-White, Devin C Anderson, Matthew Q Maus\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/com0000392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Like many other species, dogs have a natural quantity judgment system to assist with decision making to maximize resources. Additionally, dogs are highly sensitive to, and influenced by, human-delivered ostensive (i.e., social) cues. Here, we assessed the influence of one such cue-a high, rising, positive \\\"Oooh!\\\" sound-on dogs' choice of differing quantities of pieces of food presented on two different plates. Subjects (<i>N</i> = 29) received 16 randomized trials of four conditions: 1 versus 1 paired with experimenter \\\"Oooh!\\\" while looking at the one plate, 1 versus 3, 3 versus 1 paired with experimenter \\\"Oooh!,\\\" and 1 versus 1. As predicted, dogs chose the larger quantity more often in 1 versus 3 conditions. Contrary to one of our predictions, subjects chose the 1 versus 1+ \\\"Oooh!\\\" at chance levels. However, in support of another prediction, pairing the smaller reward with a positive intonation in 3 versus 1+ \\\"Oooh!\\\" significantly reduced dogs' choice of the larger reward. That is to say, without the presence of words, eye contact, or facial expressions, dogs followed a misguiding cue and chose a smaller reward that a stranger had deemed more valuable than a larger one. Local enhancement as well as a drive to increase social capital with the human are discussed as possible explanations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Comparative Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Comparative Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000392\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000392","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与许多其他物种一样,狗也有一个天然的数量判断系统,以协助决策,最大限度地利用资源。此外,狗对人类发出的暗示(即社交暗示)高度敏感,并受其影响。在这里,我们评估了这样一种暗示--高亢、上扬、积极的 "Oooh!"声--对狗选择放在两个不同盘子里的不同数量食物的影响。实验对象(N = 29)接受了 16 次随机试验,共分为四种情况:1 对 1 搭配实验者 "噢!",同时观察一个盘子;1 对 3;3 对 1 搭配实验者 "噢!";1 对 1。正如我们所预测的那样,在 1 对 3 的条件下,狗更多地选择了较大的数量。与我们的预测相反,在 1 对 1+ "噢!"的条件下,被试的选择率达到了几率水平。然而,为了支持我们的另一个预测,在 3 对 1+ "啊!"条件下,较小奖励与积极语调的搭配会显著减少狗对较大奖励的选择。也就是说,在没有语言、眼神接触或面部表情的情况下,狗会跟随错误的引导线索,选择陌生人认为比较大奖励更有价值的较小奖励。讨论的可能解释是,狗在当地得到了提升,以及狗想增加与人类的社会资本。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Positive intonation increases the perceived value of smaller rewards in a quantity discrimination task with dogs (Canis familiaris).

Like many other species, dogs have a natural quantity judgment system to assist with decision making to maximize resources. Additionally, dogs are highly sensitive to, and influenced by, human-delivered ostensive (i.e., social) cues. Here, we assessed the influence of one such cue-a high, rising, positive "Oooh!" sound-on dogs' choice of differing quantities of pieces of food presented on two different plates. Subjects (N = 29) received 16 randomized trials of four conditions: 1 versus 1 paired with experimenter "Oooh!" while looking at the one plate, 1 versus 3, 3 versus 1 paired with experimenter "Oooh!," and 1 versus 1. As predicted, dogs chose the larger quantity more often in 1 versus 3 conditions. Contrary to one of our predictions, subjects chose the 1 versus 1+ "Oooh!" at chance levels. However, in support of another prediction, pairing the smaller reward with a positive intonation in 3 versus 1+ "Oooh!" significantly reduced dogs' choice of the larger reward. That is to say, without the presence of words, eye contact, or facial expressions, dogs followed a misguiding cue and chose a smaller reward that a stranger had deemed more valuable than a larger one. Local enhancement as well as a drive to increase social capital with the human are discussed as possible explanations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Comparative Psychology publishes original research from a comparative perspective on the behavior, cognition, perception, and social relationships of diverse species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信