脑震荡要点》的可行性:针对儿童和青少年持续性脑震荡后症状的多模式干预。

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Vanessa C Rausa, Franz E Babl, Katie Davies, Michael Takagi, Gavin A Davis, Audrey McKinlay, Bianca Charles, Stephen J C Hearps, Nicholas Anderson, Cathriona Clarke, Peter Barnett, Kevin Dunne, Vicki Anderson
{"title":"脑震荡要点》的可行性:针对儿童和青少年持续性脑震荡后症状的多模式干预。","authors":"Vanessa C Rausa, Franz E Babl, Katie Davies, Michael Takagi, Gavin A Davis, Audrey McKinlay, Bianca Charles, Stephen J C Hearps, Nicholas Anderson, Cathriona Clarke, Peter Barnett, Kevin Dunne, Vicki Anderson","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2024.2402564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the feasibility of \"Concussion Essentials\" (CE), an individualized, multimodal intervention for persisting post-concussion symptoms (pPCS). Thirteen 6-18 year-olds with pPCS at 1-month post-concussion, as determined by the Post Concussion Symptom Inventory - Parent Report (PCSI-P), completed education, physiotherapy, and psychology modules, for up to 8-weeks or until pPCS resolved. Intervention participants were matched to a longitudinal observational cohort who received usual care (n = 13). The study enrolled 70% of participants symptomatic on screening and the dropout rate was <30% between baseline and post-programme assessments (4-weeks to 3-months post-injury). Symptoms improved for 100% of CE participants, with the number of symptomatic items on the PCSI-P reducing from 4-weeks, Median (IQR) = 14.0 (8.0-19.0) to 3-months, Median (IQR) = 1.0 (0.0-5.0). Comparatively, symptoms improved for approximately half of matched usual care participants. CE participants (n = 8) and their parents (n = 11) completed acceptability questionnaires. Most parents (91%) agreed CE was acceptable for children with concussion. All participants agreed CE was appropriate for concussion, while approximately 88% agreed they enjoyed the intervention and would recommend CE to others. Findings suggest CE is a feasible and acceptable treatment for paediatric pPCS. Further investigation within a larger scale randomized clinical trial is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of Concussion Essentials: A multimodal intervention for persisting post-concussion symptoms among children and adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa C Rausa, Franz E Babl, Katie Davies, Michael Takagi, Gavin A Davis, Audrey McKinlay, Bianca Charles, Stephen J C Hearps, Nicholas Anderson, Cathriona Clarke, Peter Barnett, Kevin Dunne, Vicki Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09602011.2024.2402564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examined the feasibility of \\\"Concussion Essentials\\\" (CE), an individualized, multimodal intervention for persisting post-concussion symptoms (pPCS). Thirteen 6-18 year-olds with pPCS at 1-month post-concussion, as determined by the Post Concussion Symptom Inventory - Parent Report (PCSI-P), completed education, physiotherapy, and psychology modules, for up to 8-weeks or until pPCS resolved. Intervention participants were matched to a longitudinal observational cohort who received usual care (n = 13). The study enrolled 70% of participants symptomatic on screening and the dropout rate was <30% between baseline and post-programme assessments (4-weeks to 3-months post-injury). Symptoms improved for 100% of CE participants, with the number of symptomatic items on the PCSI-P reducing from 4-weeks, Median (IQR) = 14.0 (8.0-19.0) to 3-months, Median (IQR) = 1.0 (0.0-5.0). Comparatively, symptoms improved for approximately half of matched usual care participants. CE participants (n = 8) and their parents (n = 11) completed acceptability questionnaires. Most parents (91%) agreed CE was acceptable for children with concussion. All participants agreed CE was appropriate for concussion, while approximately 88% agreed they enjoyed the intervention and would recommend CE to others. Findings suggest CE is a feasible and acceptable treatment for paediatric pPCS. Further investigation within a larger scale randomized clinical trial is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2024.2402564\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2024.2402564","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了 "脑震荡要点"(CE)的可行性,这是一种针对持续性脑震荡后症状(pPCS)的个性化、多模式干预措施。根据 "脑震荡后症状量表--家长报告"(PCSI-P),13 名 6-18 岁的儿童在脑震荡后 1 个月出现了持续性脑震荡后症状(pPCS),他们完成了教育、物理治疗和心理治疗模块,持续时间长达 8 周或直到持续性脑震荡后症状得到缓解。干预参与者与接受常规护理的纵向观察队列(n = 13)相匹配。该研究招募了 70% 在筛查时有症状的参与者,辍学率为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of Concussion Essentials: A multimodal intervention for persisting post-concussion symptoms among children and adolescents.

This study examined the feasibility of "Concussion Essentials" (CE), an individualized, multimodal intervention for persisting post-concussion symptoms (pPCS). Thirteen 6-18 year-olds with pPCS at 1-month post-concussion, as determined by the Post Concussion Symptom Inventory - Parent Report (PCSI-P), completed education, physiotherapy, and psychology modules, for up to 8-weeks or until pPCS resolved. Intervention participants were matched to a longitudinal observational cohort who received usual care (n = 13). The study enrolled 70% of participants symptomatic on screening and the dropout rate was <30% between baseline and post-programme assessments (4-weeks to 3-months post-injury). Symptoms improved for 100% of CE participants, with the number of symptomatic items on the PCSI-P reducing from 4-weeks, Median (IQR) = 14.0 (8.0-19.0) to 3-months, Median (IQR) = 1.0 (0.0-5.0). Comparatively, symptoms improved for approximately half of matched usual care participants. CE participants (n = 8) and their parents (n = 11) completed acceptability questionnaires. Most parents (91%) agreed CE was acceptable for children with concussion. All participants agreed CE was appropriate for concussion, while approximately 88% agreed they enjoyed the intervention and would recommend CE to others. Findings suggest CE is a feasible and acceptable treatment for paediatric pPCS. Further investigation within a larger scale randomized clinical trial is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信