脾切除是内皮移植后发生移植物排斥反应的风险因素:回顾性研究

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Paola Kammrath Betancor, Daniel Böhringer, Philip Maier, Thabo Lapp, Thomas Reinhard
{"title":"脾切除是内皮移植后发生移植物排斥反应的风险因素:回顾性研究","authors":"Paola Kammrath Betancor, Daniel Böhringer, Philip Maier, Thabo Lapp, Thomas Reinhard","doi":"10.2196/50106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior chamber-associated immune deviation (ACAID) is an active immunotolerance mechanism, which is induced by placing antigen into the anterior eye chamber as long as a major surgical trauma is avoided. For this reason, ACAID may be a major contributor to the favorable immunologic outcomes in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Rodent models have demonstrated the importance of a functional spleen for the development of an ACAID.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate whether splenectomy leads to increased rejection rates after DMEK in humans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective evaluation was conducted on the course following DMEK at the Eye Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, for patients with a self-reported history of splenectomy compared to patients without this condition. Potential study patients were contacted by mail. A questionnaire to self-report splenectomy and the time thereof was sent out. The medical records of all consenting patients at the Eye Center were reviewed for graft survival and immune reactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We asked 1818 patients after DMEK to report their history of splenectomy. A total of 1340 patients responded and were included in the study. Of these 1340 patients, 16 (1.2%) reported a history of splenectomy (ie, 26 DMEKs, with 10 patients being transplanted in both eyes and 6 patients being transplanted in 1 eye; median age at surgery 73.7, range 66.7-76.1 y). The remaining patients (1324 patients, ie, 1941 eyes) served as controls, with 1941 DMEKs (median age at surgery 71.5, range 64.1-77.2 y). Five (19%) out of the 26 eyes from the splenectomy group required a second transplant due to dislocation (n=2.8%), failure (n=2.8%), and rejection (n=1.4%). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no relevant difference compared with controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that splenectomy has no major effect on the outcome following DMEK. Subsequent, ACAID may not be the main reason for the favorable immunological outcomes in DMEK, or the camero-splenic axis may be subordinate in humans. However, we only included 16 patients who underwent splenectomy, so it might be possible that we missed a minor effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"13 ","pages":"e50106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11422749/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Splenectomy as a Risk Factor for Graft Rejection Following Endothelial Transplantation: Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Paola Kammrath Betancor, Daniel Böhringer, Philip Maier, Thabo Lapp, Thomas Reinhard\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/50106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior chamber-associated immune deviation (ACAID) is an active immunotolerance mechanism, which is induced by placing antigen into the anterior eye chamber as long as a major surgical trauma is avoided. For this reason, ACAID may be a major contributor to the favorable immunologic outcomes in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Rodent models have demonstrated the importance of a functional spleen for the development of an ACAID.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate whether splenectomy leads to increased rejection rates after DMEK in humans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective evaluation was conducted on the course following DMEK at the Eye Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, for patients with a self-reported history of splenectomy compared to patients without this condition. Potential study patients were contacted by mail. A questionnaire to self-report splenectomy and the time thereof was sent out. The medical records of all consenting patients at the Eye Center were reviewed for graft survival and immune reactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We asked 1818 patients after DMEK to report their history of splenectomy. A total of 1340 patients responded and were included in the study. Of these 1340 patients, 16 (1.2%) reported a history of splenectomy (ie, 26 DMEKs, with 10 patients being transplanted in both eyes and 6 patients being transplanted in 1 eye; median age at surgery 73.7, range 66.7-76.1 y). The remaining patients (1324 patients, ie, 1941 eyes) served as controls, with 1941 DMEKs (median age at surgery 71.5, range 64.1-77.2 y). Five (19%) out of the 26 eyes from the splenectomy group required a second transplant due to dislocation (n=2.8%), failure (n=2.8%), and rejection (n=1.4%). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no relevant difference compared with controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that splenectomy has no major effect on the outcome following DMEK. Subsequent, ACAID may not be the main reason for the favorable immunological outcomes in DMEK, or the camero-splenic axis may be subordinate in humans. However, we only included 16 patients who underwent splenectomy, so it might be possible that we missed a minor effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interactive Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"e50106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11422749/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interactive Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/50106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/50106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前房相关免疫偏差(ACAID)是一种主动免疫耐受机制,只要避免大的手术创伤,将抗原放入前眼房就会诱发这种免疫偏差。因此,ACAID 可能是 Descemet 膜内皮角膜移植术(DMEK)取得良好免疫效果的主要原因。啮齿动物模型已证明功能性脾脏对 ACAID 的发生非常重要:本研究旨在探讨脾脏切除是否会导致人类 DMEK 术后排斥率的增加:方法:弗莱堡大学医学中心眼科中心对自述有脾脏切除史的患者与无脾脏切除史的患者进行了DMEK术后病程回顾性评估。研究人员通过邮件联系了潜在的研究对象。同时还发出了一份自述脾脏切除术及其时间的调查问卷。我们还查阅了眼科中心所有同意患者的病历,以了解移植物的存活率和免疫反应:我们要求 1818 名接受过 DMEK 手术的患者报告他们的脾脏切除史。共有 1340 名患者回复并被纳入研究。在这 1340 例患者中,16 例(1.2%)报告了脾脏切除史(即 26 例 DMEK,其中 10 例患者双眼移植,6 例患者单眼移植;手术时的中位年龄为 73.7 岁,范围为 66.7-76.1 岁)。其余患者(1324 名患者,即 1941 只眼睛)作为对照组,1941 名患者接受了 DMEK 手术(手术时的中位年龄为 71.5 岁,范围为 64.1-77.2 岁)。在脾脏切除组的26只眼睛中,有5只(19%)因脱位(n=2.8%)、失败(n=2.8%)和排斥(n=1.4%)而需要进行第二次移植。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,与对照组相比没有相关差异:我们的研究结果表明,脾切除术对DMEK术后的结果没有重大影响。随后,ACAID 可能不是 DMEK 免疫学结果良好的主要原因,或者在人类中,驼脾轴可能处于从属地位。不过,我们只纳入了 16 例接受脾切除术的患者,因此可能会遗漏一些微小的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Splenectomy as a Risk Factor for Graft Rejection Following Endothelial Transplantation: Retrospective Study.

Background: Anterior chamber-associated immune deviation (ACAID) is an active immunotolerance mechanism, which is induced by placing antigen into the anterior eye chamber as long as a major surgical trauma is avoided. For this reason, ACAID may be a major contributor to the favorable immunologic outcomes in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Rodent models have demonstrated the importance of a functional spleen for the development of an ACAID.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether splenectomy leads to increased rejection rates after DMEK in humans.

Methods: A retrospective evaluation was conducted on the course following DMEK at the Eye Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, for patients with a self-reported history of splenectomy compared to patients without this condition. Potential study patients were contacted by mail. A questionnaire to self-report splenectomy and the time thereof was sent out. The medical records of all consenting patients at the Eye Center were reviewed for graft survival and immune reactions.

Results: We asked 1818 patients after DMEK to report their history of splenectomy. A total of 1340 patients responded and were included in the study. Of these 1340 patients, 16 (1.2%) reported a history of splenectomy (ie, 26 DMEKs, with 10 patients being transplanted in both eyes and 6 patients being transplanted in 1 eye; median age at surgery 73.7, range 66.7-76.1 y). The remaining patients (1324 patients, ie, 1941 eyes) served as controls, with 1941 DMEKs (median age at surgery 71.5, range 64.1-77.2 y). Five (19%) out of the 26 eyes from the splenectomy group required a second transplant due to dislocation (n=2.8%), failure (n=2.8%), and rejection (n=1.4%). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no relevant difference compared with controls.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that splenectomy has no major effect on the outcome following DMEK. Subsequent, ACAID may not be the main reason for the favorable immunological outcomes in DMEK, or the camero-splenic axis may be subordinate in humans. However, we only included 16 patients who underwent splenectomy, so it might be possible that we missed a minor effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Interactive Journal of Medical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信