掌握气管造口护理:护士气管造口术培训进修计划:比较两种培训方法,一种是单独的模拟实践培训,另一种是补充性的自主电子学习。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Wei Jun Dan Ong, Amit Kansal, Fauziah Jabil, Li-Phing Clarice Wee, Yit Ying Adeline Tan, Ching Yee Tan, Eleanor Dela Peña, Faheem Ahmed Khan
{"title":"掌握气管造口护理:护士气管造口术培训进修计划:比较两种培训方法,一种是单独的模拟实践培训,另一种是补充性的自主电子学习。","authors":"Wei Jun Dan Ong, Amit Kansal, Fauziah Jabil, Li-Phing Clarice Wee, Yit Ying Adeline Tan, Ching Yee Tan, Eleanor Dela Peña, Faheem Ahmed Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective clinical education is essential for managing tracheostomy patients safely and efficiently. Simulation-based training has shown greater efficacy than traditional methods in various clinical settings. Our internal training programme, called the Tracheostomy Refresher Program (TRP) was used to enhance nurses' skills in tracheostomy care.</p><p><strong>Aim/objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the TRP on nurses' self-reported knowledge and confidence and psychomotor skills comparing hands-on simulation-based training alone (TRP-S) with both the simulation-based training and the e-learning component (TRP-S + e).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted at a large tertiary hospital in Singapore from February 2022 to October 2022, focussing on the TRP. Participants were divided into two cohorts: those receiving TRP-S and those receiving additional complementary TRP-S + e. All participants completed theory tests and affective questionnaires before and after the training to assess knowledge and attitudes. At the same time, their psychomotor skills were evaluated during the simulation using a standardised checklist. The two cohorts were then compared based on the results of these pretests and post-tests and the psychomotor skills assessment to evaluate the effectiveness of the additional e-learning component.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported significantly enhanced confidence, knowledge, and psychomotor skills in tracheostomy care post training (p < 0.001 for all). The TRP-S + e cohort showed significantly higher knowledge and confidence scores than the TRP-S cohort (p < 0.001 for both).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests that a TRP incorporating hands-on simulation-based training with or without e-learning significantly improved self-reported knowledge, confidence, and psychomotor skills in tracheostomy care. Future research should explore the optimal duration, engagement strategies, and cost-effectiveness of such educational techniques and whether similar approaches can be applied for other clinical skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mastering tracheostomy care: Refresher programme for tracheostomy training for nurses: Comparison of two training methods based on hands-on simulation-based training alone versus additional complementary self-directed e-learning.\",\"authors\":\"Wei Jun Dan Ong, Amit Kansal, Fauziah Jabil, Li-Phing Clarice Wee, Yit Ying Adeline Tan, Ching Yee Tan, Eleanor Dela Peña, Faheem Ahmed Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective clinical education is essential for managing tracheostomy patients safely and efficiently. Simulation-based training has shown greater efficacy than traditional methods in various clinical settings. Our internal training programme, called the Tracheostomy Refresher Program (TRP) was used to enhance nurses' skills in tracheostomy care.</p><p><strong>Aim/objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the TRP on nurses' self-reported knowledge and confidence and psychomotor skills comparing hands-on simulation-based training alone (TRP-S) with both the simulation-based training and the e-learning component (TRP-S + e).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted at a large tertiary hospital in Singapore from February 2022 to October 2022, focussing on the TRP. Participants were divided into two cohorts: those receiving TRP-S and those receiving additional complementary TRP-S + e. All participants completed theory tests and affective questionnaires before and after the training to assess knowledge and attitudes. At the same time, their psychomotor skills were evaluated during the simulation using a standardised checklist. The two cohorts were then compared based on the results of these pretests and post-tests and the psychomotor skills assessment to evaluate the effectiveness of the additional e-learning component.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported significantly enhanced confidence, knowledge, and psychomotor skills in tracheostomy care post training (p < 0.001 for all). The TRP-S + e cohort showed significantly higher knowledge and confidence scores than the TRP-S cohort (p < 0.001 for both).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests that a TRP incorporating hands-on simulation-based training with or without e-learning significantly improved self-reported knowledge, confidence, and psychomotor skills in tracheostomy care. Future research should explore the optimal duration, engagement strategies, and cost-effectiveness of such educational techniques and whether similar approaches can be applied for other clinical skills.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Critical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有效的临床教育对于安全高效地管理气管造口术患者至关重要。在各种临床环境中,模拟训练比传统方法更有效。我们的内部培训计划名为 "气管造口术进修计划"(TRP),旨在提高护士在气管造口术护理方面的技能:本研究的目的是评估 TRP 对护士自我报告的知识和信心以及心理运动技能的影响,并对单独的模拟实训(TRP-S)与模拟实训和电子学习部分(TRP-S + e)进行比较:研究于 2022 年 2 月至 2022 年 10 月在新加坡一家大型三级医院进行,重点是 TRP。所有参与者在培训前后都完成了理论测试和情感问卷,以评估知识和态度。同时,在模拟训练过程中,还使用标准化检查表对他们的心理运动技能进行了评估。然后,根据这些前测、后测和心理运动技能评估的结果,对两组学员进行比较,以评估额外电子学习内容的效果:结果:参加培训的人员在培训后对气管造口护理的信心、知识和心理运动技能都有了明显提高(P 结论:我们的研究表明,气管造口护理培训计划(TRP)包含了气管造口护理方面的知识和心理运动技能:我们的研究表明,无论是否采用电子学习,以动手模拟为基础的 TRP 都能显著提高自我报告的气管造口护理知识、信心和心理运动技能。未来的研究应探索此类教育技术的最佳持续时间、参与策略和成本效益,以及类似方法是否可用于其他临床技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mastering tracheostomy care: Refresher programme for tracheostomy training for nurses: Comparison of two training methods based on hands-on simulation-based training alone versus additional complementary self-directed e-learning.

Background: Effective clinical education is essential for managing tracheostomy patients safely and efficiently. Simulation-based training has shown greater efficacy than traditional methods in various clinical settings. Our internal training programme, called the Tracheostomy Refresher Program (TRP) was used to enhance nurses' skills in tracheostomy care.

Aim/objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the TRP on nurses' self-reported knowledge and confidence and psychomotor skills comparing hands-on simulation-based training alone (TRP-S) with both the simulation-based training and the e-learning component (TRP-S + e).

Methods: The study was conducted at a large tertiary hospital in Singapore from February 2022 to October 2022, focussing on the TRP. Participants were divided into two cohorts: those receiving TRP-S and those receiving additional complementary TRP-S + e. All participants completed theory tests and affective questionnaires before and after the training to assess knowledge and attitudes. At the same time, their psychomotor skills were evaluated during the simulation using a standardised checklist. The two cohorts were then compared based on the results of these pretests and post-tests and the psychomotor skills assessment to evaluate the effectiveness of the additional e-learning component.

Results: Participants reported significantly enhanced confidence, knowledge, and psychomotor skills in tracheostomy care post training (p < 0.001 for all). The TRP-S + e cohort showed significantly higher knowledge and confidence scores than the TRP-S cohort (p < 0.001 for both).

Conclusion: Our study suggests that a TRP incorporating hands-on simulation-based training with or without e-learning significantly improved self-reported knowledge, confidence, and psychomotor skills in tracheostomy care. Future research should explore the optimal duration, engagement strategies, and cost-effectiveness of such educational techniques and whether similar approaches can be applied for other clinical skills.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信