Arcangelo Barbonetti, Daniele Tienforti, Federica Antolini, Luca Spagnolo, Francesca Cavallo, Alfonso Boris Di Pasquale, Mario Maggi, Giovanni Corona
{"title":"勃起功能障碍的营养干预:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Arcangelo Barbonetti, Daniele Tienforti, Federica Antolini, Luca Spagnolo, Francesca Cavallo, Alfonso Boris Di Pasquale, Mario Maggi, Giovanni Corona","doi":"10.1093/jsxmed/qdae123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although nutraceutical-based treatments are often offered for erectile dysfunction (ED), their efficacy remains doubtful, and the choice of one substance over the other is challenged by the dearth of head-to-head comparative studies.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to compare the efficacy of available nutraceutical interventions, alone or in combination with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i), in improving erectile function in men with ED through a network meta-analysis (NMA), which incorporates direct and indirect evidence into one model thus generating a hierarchy of effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of any nutraceutical regimen in improving erectile function when compared to each other, placebo, and/or PDE5i in men with ED. Data were included in a random-effects NMA, where efficacy of treatments was ranked by surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Two NMAs were also conducted separately for organic and non-organic ED. Reciprocal comparisons between all treatments were analyzed by league tables.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>The main outcome was the standardized mean difference in the score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 or IIEF-6.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen RCTs provided information on 1000 men with ED. In the overall NMA, compared to placebo, the combination propionyl L-carnitine (PLC) + acetyl L-carnitine (ALC) + Sildenafil was associated with the highest SUCRA (97%) in improving erectile function score, followed by L-Arginine + Tadalafil (84%), Sildenafil (79%), Tadalafil (72%), and L-Arginine (52%). No other treatment regimen showed efficacy with statistical significance. In patients with organic ED, the efficacy of Sildenafil and Tadalafil was significantly improved by PLC + ALC and L-Arginine, respectively. On the contrary, in non-organic ED, nutraceuticals did not improve the therapeutic performance of daily Tadalafil.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>This NMA contributes valuable insights into the potential of nutraceutical interventions for ED.</p><p><strong>Strengths and limitations: </strong>We employed strict inclusion criteria related to study design and diagnostic tool, ensuring the assumption of transitivity and the consistency of the analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Against a background of general ineffectiveness of most nutraceutical interventions, L-Arginine and the mix PLC + ALC appeared to be of some usefulness in improving erectile function, especially in combination with PDE5i in organic ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nutraceutical interventions for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Arcangelo Barbonetti, Daniele Tienforti, Federica Antolini, Luca Spagnolo, Francesca Cavallo, Alfonso Boris Di Pasquale, Mario Maggi, Giovanni Corona\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jsxmed/qdae123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although nutraceutical-based treatments are often offered for erectile dysfunction (ED), their efficacy remains doubtful, and the choice of one substance over the other is challenged by the dearth of head-to-head comparative studies.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to compare the efficacy of available nutraceutical interventions, alone or in combination with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i), in improving erectile function in men with ED through a network meta-analysis (NMA), which incorporates direct and indirect evidence into one model thus generating a hierarchy of effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of any nutraceutical regimen in improving erectile function when compared to each other, placebo, and/or PDE5i in men with ED. Data were included in a random-effects NMA, where efficacy of treatments was ranked by surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Two NMAs were also conducted separately for organic and non-organic ED. Reciprocal comparisons between all treatments were analyzed by league tables.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>The main outcome was the standardized mean difference in the score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 or IIEF-6.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen RCTs provided information on 1000 men with ED. In the overall NMA, compared to placebo, the combination propionyl L-carnitine (PLC) + acetyl L-carnitine (ALC) + Sildenafil was associated with the highest SUCRA (97%) in improving erectile function score, followed by L-Arginine + Tadalafil (84%), Sildenafil (79%), Tadalafil (72%), and L-Arginine (52%). No other treatment regimen showed efficacy with statistical significance. In patients with organic ED, the efficacy of Sildenafil and Tadalafil was significantly improved by PLC + ALC and L-Arginine, respectively. On the contrary, in non-organic ED, nutraceuticals did not improve the therapeutic performance of daily Tadalafil.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>This NMA contributes valuable insights into the potential of nutraceutical interventions for ED.</p><p><strong>Strengths and limitations: </strong>We employed strict inclusion criteria related to study design and diagnostic tool, ensuring the assumption of transitivity and the consistency of the analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Against a background of general ineffectiveness of most nutraceutical interventions, L-Arginine and the mix PLC + ALC appeared to be of some usefulness in improving erectile function, especially in combination with PDE5i in organic ED.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae123\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:尽管营养保健品是治疗勃起功能障碍(ED)的常用药物,但其疗效仍然值得怀疑,而且由于缺乏正面比较研究,在选择一种药物或另一种药物时面临挑战。目的:我们旨在通过网络荟萃分析(NMA)比较现有营养保健品干预措施(单独使用或与5型磷酸二酯酶抑制剂(PDE5i)联合使用)在改善ED男性勃起功能方面的疗效:方法:在 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Sciences 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中搜索了随机安慰剂对照试验 (RCT),这些试验评估了任何营养保健品方案与其他营养保健品、安慰剂和/或 PDE5i 相比在改善男性 ED 患者勃起功能方面的效果。数据被纳入随机效应 NMA,根据累积排序曲线(SUCRA)的表面积对治疗效果进行排序。还针对器质性和非器质性 ED 分别进行了两次 NMA。所有治疗方法之间的相互比较通过列表进行分析:主要结果是国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)-5 或 IIEF-6 评分的标准化平均差异:15项研究提供了1000名男性ED患者的信息。在总体NMA中,与安慰剂相比,丙酰左旋肉碱(PLC)+乙酰左旋肉碱(ALC)+西地那非组合疗法在改善勃起功能评分方面的SUCRA最高(97%),其次是左旋精氨酸+他达拉非(84%)、西地那非(79%)、他达拉非(72%)和左旋精氨酸(52%)。其他治疗方案均未显示出具有统计学意义的疗效。在器质性 ED 患者中,PLC + ALC 和 L-Arginine 分别显著提高了西地那非和他达拉非的疗效。相反,在非器质性 ED 患者中,营养保健品并未改善每日服用他达拉非的治疗效果:这项NMA研究为营养保健品干预ED的潜力提供了有价值的见解:我们采用了与研究设计和诊断工具相关的严格纳入标准,确保了横向性假设和分析的一致性:在大多数营养保健品干预措施普遍无效的背景下,L-精氨酸和混合 PLC + ALC 似乎对改善勃起功能有一定作用,尤其是在器质性 ED 中与 PDE5i 联合使用时。
Nutraceutical interventions for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Background: Although nutraceutical-based treatments are often offered for erectile dysfunction (ED), their efficacy remains doubtful, and the choice of one substance over the other is challenged by the dearth of head-to-head comparative studies.
Aim: We aimed to compare the efficacy of available nutraceutical interventions, alone or in combination with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i), in improving erectile function in men with ED through a network meta-analysis (NMA), which incorporates direct and indirect evidence into one model thus generating a hierarchy of effectiveness.
Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of any nutraceutical regimen in improving erectile function when compared to each other, placebo, and/or PDE5i in men with ED. Data were included in a random-effects NMA, where efficacy of treatments was ranked by surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Two NMAs were also conducted separately for organic and non-organic ED. Reciprocal comparisons between all treatments were analyzed by league tables.
Outcomes: The main outcome was the standardized mean difference in the score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 or IIEF-6.
Results: Fifteen RCTs provided information on 1000 men with ED. In the overall NMA, compared to placebo, the combination propionyl L-carnitine (PLC) + acetyl L-carnitine (ALC) + Sildenafil was associated with the highest SUCRA (97%) in improving erectile function score, followed by L-Arginine + Tadalafil (84%), Sildenafil (79%), Tadalafil (72%), and L-Arginine (52%). No other treatment regimen showed efficacy with statistical significance. In patients with organic ED, the efficacy of Sildenafil and Tadalafil was significantly improved by PLC + ALC and L-Arginine, respectively. On the contrary, in non-organic ED, nutraceuticals did not improve the therapeutic performance of daily Tadalafil.
Clinical implications: This NMA contributes valuable insights into the potential of nutraceutical interventions for ED.
Strengths and limitations: We employed strict inclusion criteria related to study design and diagnostic tool, ensuring the assumption of transitivity and the consistency of the analysis.
Conclusion: Against a background of general ineffectiveness of most nutraceutical interventions, L-Arginine and the mix PLC + ALC appeared to be of some usefulness in improving erectile function, especially in combination with PDE5i in organic ED.