医学研究生教育中交叉护理的复杂性和挑战:定性研究。

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Lauren A Heidemann, Alexandra H Vinson, David T Hughes, Catherine McDermott, Sarah Hartley
{"title":"医学研究生教育中交叉护理的复杂性和挑战:定性研究。","authors":"Lauren A Heidemann, Alexandra H Vinson, David T Hughes, Catherine McDermott, Sarah Hartley","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cross-cover care (care for hospitalized patients when the primary team is absent) is a common graduate medical education responsibility; however, it may lead to increased preventable adverse events. Despite understanding the difficulties of cross-cover care, medical educators lack comprehensive knowledge of specific challenges that residents face and how they handle these challenges. This study explores the challenges residents experience when providing cross-cover care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The authors conducted 60 semistructured, qualitative interviews with 20 internal medicine and surgery residents at a single academic institution between October 2021 and April 2022. Each resident participated in 3 interviews, 2 immediately after a shift. Working inductively, the authors generated codes for important themes. Study design and data collection were guided by interpretive description, a qualitative approach for health care research focused on experiences and perceptions to develop meaningful findings. To illustrate residents' workflow and aid in quality improvement efforts, the authors created a process map.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen cross-cover challenges were organized into 7 interrelated and overlapping themes: lack of baseline knowledge, inadequate or inaccurate information transfer from the primary team, unfamiliarity with cross-cover patients, high task volume leading to increased interruptions, ill-defined roles leading to unmet expectations from others, perceived decreased access to resources, and fatigue. The process map illustrates 4 cross-cover workflow components: information transfer from the primary team to the cross-cover team, direct handling of cross-cover tasks that are assigned by the primary team or that arise during the time of cross-cover, information transfer back to primary team and other care team members, and responsibilities that residents have overnight that are not directly related to cross-cover.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Residents face substantial challenges when providing cross-cover care, which have important implications for patient safety and resident well-being. The medical community should strive to develop educational and structural interventions to improve this process.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complexity and Challenges of Cross-Cover Care in Graduate Medical Education: A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren A Heidemann, Alexandra H Vinson, David T Hughes, Catherine McDermott, Sarah Hartley\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cross-cover care (care for hospitalized patients when the primary team is absent) is a common graduate medical education responsibility; however, it may lead to increased preventable adverse events. Despite understanding the difficulties of cross-cover care, medical educators lack comprehensive knowledge of specific challenges that residents face and how they handle these challenges. This study explores the challenges residents experience when providing cross-cover care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The authors conducted 60 semistructured, qualitative interviews with 20 internal medicine and surgery residents at a single academic institution between October 2021 and April 2022. Each resident participated in 3 interviews, 2 immediately after a shift. Working inductively, the authors generated codes for important themes. Study design and data collection were guided by interpretive description, a qualitative approach for health care research focused on experiences and perceptions to develop meaningful findings. To illustrate residents' workflow and aid in quality improvement efforts, the authors created a process map.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen cross-cover challenges were organized into 7 interrelated and overlapping themes: lack of baseline knowledge, inadequate or inaccurate information transfer from the primary team, unfamiliarity with cross-cover patients, high task volume leading to increased interruptions, ill-defined roles leading to unmet expectations from others, perceived decreased access to resources, and fatigue. The process map illustrates 4 cross-cover workflow components: information transfer from the primary team to the cross-cover team, direct handling of cross-cover tasks that are assigned by the primary team or that arise during the time of cross-cover, information transfer back to primary team and other care team members, and responsibilities that residents have overnight that are not directly related to cross-cover.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Residents face substantial challenges when providing cross-cover care, which have important implications for patient safety and resident well-being. The medical community should strive to develop educational and structural interventions to improve this process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005875\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005875","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:交叉护理(当主要团队缺席时对住院患者的护理)是研究生医学教育的一项常见职责;然而,它可能会导致可预防的不良事件增加。尽管了解交叉护理的困难,但医学教育者对住院医师面临的具体挑战以及他们如何应对这些挑战缺乏全面的了解。本研究探讨了住院医师在提供交叉护理时遇到的挑战:作者在 2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 4 月期间对一家学术机构的 20 名内科和外科住院医师进行了 60 次半结构化定性访谈。每位住院医师参加了 3 次访谈,其中 2 次是在轮班结束后立即进行的。作者采用归纳法对重要主题进行编码。研究设计和数据收集以解释性描述为指导,解释性描述是一种医疗保健研究的定性方法,侧重于经验和感知,以得出有意义的研究结果。为了说明住院医师的工作流程并协助质量改进工作,作者绘制了流程图:结果:17 项交叉护理挑战被归纳为 7 个相互关联、相互重叠的主题:缺乏基础知识、来自主要团队的信息传递不足或不准确、不熟悉交叉护理患者、任务量大导致干扰增多、角色不明确导致无法满足他人的期望、感知到资源获取途径减少以及疲劳。流程图说明了交叉护理工作流程的 4 个组成部分:从主要团队到交叉护理团队的信息传递、直接处理主要团队分配的或在交叉护理期间出现的交叉护理任务、将信息传递回主要团队和其他护理团队成员,以及住院医师在一夜之间承担的与交叉护理无直接关系的职责:住院医师在提供交叉护理时面临着巨大的挑战,这对患者的安全和住院医师的福祉有着重要的影响。医疗界应努力制定教育和结构性干预措施,以改善这一过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complexity and Challenges of Cross-Cover Care in Graduate Medical Education: A Qualitative Study.

Purpose: Cross-cover care (care for hospitalized patients when the primary team is absent) is a common graduate medical education responsibility; however, it may lead to increased preventable adverse events. Despite understanding the difficulties of cross-cover care, medical educators lack comprehensive knowledge of specific challenges that residents face and how they handle these challenges. This study explores the challenges residents experience when providing cross-cover care.

Method: The authors conducted 60 semistructured, qualitative interviews with 20 internal medicine and surgery residents at a single academic institution between October 2021 and April 2022. Each resident participated in 3 interviews, 2 immediately after a shift. Working inductively, the authors generated codes for important themes. Study design and data collection were guided by interpretive description, a qualitative approach for health care research focused on experiences and perceptions to develop meaningful findings. To illustrate residents' workflow and aid in quality improvement efforts, the authors created a process map.

Results: Seventeen cross-cover challenges were organized into 7 interrelated and overlapping themes: lack of baseline knowledge, inadequate or inaccurate information transfer from the primary team, unfamiliarity with cross-cover patients, high task volume leading to increased interruptions, ill-defined roles leading to unmet expectations from others, perceived decreased access to resources, and fatigue. The process map illustrates 4 cross-cover workflow components: information transfer from the primary team to the cross-cover team, direct handling of cross-cover tasks that are assigned by the primary team or that arise during the time of cross-cover, information transfer back to primary team and other care team members, and responsibilities that residents have overnight that are not directly related to cross-cover.

Conclusions: Residents face substantial challenges when providing cross-cover care, which have important implications for patient safety and resident well-being. The medical community should strive to develop educational and structural interventions to improve this process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信