血液炎症标志物能否识别子痫前期孕妇?仍是一个有争议的问题。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Israel Medical Association Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01
Andrei Braester, Artyom Bilyk, Celia Suriu, Luiza Akria, Najib Dally, Masad Barhoum
{"title":"血液炎症标志物能否识别子痫前期孕妇?仍是一个有争议的问题。","authors":"Andrei Braester, Artyom Bilyk, Celia Suriu, Luiza Akria, Najib Dally, Masad Barhoum","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preeclampsia is a unique vascular disease during pregnancy that generally appears after 20 of weeks gestation or until 6 weeks after delivery. Left undiagnosed, preeclampsia can lead rapidly to death of both mother and fetus.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To verify the efficacy of peripheral blood inflammatory markers (BIMs)in diagnosing preeclampsia and compare them with results from other studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our retrospective case-control study comprised two patient groups. Pregnant women with preeclampsia and pregnant women without preeclampsia were compared for BIMs: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and mean platelet volume (MPV). The primary endpoint of our research was to assess the predictive power of BIMs for preeclampsia diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample size was calculated based on expected differences of BIMs between the control and study groups. Comparison of quantitative variables was conducted with independent sample t-test or alternatively by Wilcoxon rank sum test. The MPV values were slightly higher in the preeclampsia group, but not statistically significant. NLR and PLR did differentiate between study and control groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diagnostic accuracy of BIMs is unsatisfactory for preeclampsia diagnosis. Discrepancies concerning these values need to be clarified. Further large prospective studies are necessary to validate the potential factor accuracy in preeclampsia diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50268,"journal":{"name":"Israel Medical Association Journal","volume":"26 8","pages":"500-503"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Blood Inflammatory Markers Identify Pregnant Women with Preeclampsia? Still a Controversial Issue.\",\"authors\":\"Andrei Braester, Artyom Bilyk, Celia Suriu, Luiza Akria, Najib Dally, Masad Barhoum\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preeclampsia is a unique vascular disease during pregnancy that generally appears after 20 of weeks gestation or until 6 weeks after delivery. Left undiagnosed, preeclampsia can lead rapidly to death of both mother and fetus.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To verify the efficacy of peripheral blood inflammatory markers (BIMs)in diagnosing preeclampsia and compare them with results from other studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our retrospective case-control study comprised two patient groups. Pregnant women with preeclampsia and pregnant women without preeclampsia were compared for BIMs: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and mean platelet volume (MPV). The primary endpoint of our research was to assess the predictive power of BIMs for preeclampsia diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample size was calculated based on expected differences of BIMs between the control and study groups. Comparison of quantitative variables was conducted with independent sample t-test or alternatively by Wilcoxon rank sum test. The MPV values were slightly higher in the preeclampsia group, but not statistically significant. NLR and PLR did differentiate between study and control groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diagnostic accuracy of BIMs is unsatisfactory for preeclampsia diagnosis. Discrepancies concerning these values need to be clarified. Further large prospective studies are necessary to validate the potential factor accuracy in preeclampsia diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Israel Medical Association Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 8\",\"pages\":\"500-503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Israel Medical Association Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Medical Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:子痫前期是一种独特的妊娠期血管疾病,一般在妊娠 20 周后或产后 6 周出现。如果不及时诊断,子痫前期可迅速导致母亲和胎儿死亡:验证外周血炎症标志物(BIMs)在诊断子痫前期中的有效性,并将其与其他研究结果进行比较:我们的回顾性病例对照研究包括两组患者。方法:我们的回顾性病例对照研究由两组患者组成,比较了子痫前期孕妇和非子痫前期孕妇的 BIMs:中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和平均血小板体积(MPV)。我们研究的主要终点是评估 BIMs 对子痫前期诊断的预测能力:样本量是根据对照组和研究组之间 BIMs 的预期差异计算得出的。定量变量的比较采用独立样本 t 检验或 Wilcoxon 秩和检验。子痫前期组的 MPV 值稍高,但无统计学意义。NLR和PLR在研究组和对照组之间存在差异:结论:BIMs 对子痫前期诊断的准确性并不令人满意。结论:BIMs 对子痫前期诊断的准确性并不理想,需要澄清这些数值之间的差异。有必要进一步开展大型前瞻性研究,以验证子痫前期诊断中潜在因素的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can Blood Inflammatory Markers Identify Pregnant Women with Preeclampsia? Still a Controversial Issue.

Background: Preeclampsia is a unique vascular disease during pregnancy that generally appears after 20 of weeks gestation or until 6 weeks after delivery. Left undiagnosed, preeclampsia can lead rapidly to death of both mother and fetus.

Objectives: To verify the efficacy of peripheral blood inflammatory markers (BIMs)in diagnosing preeclampsia and compare them with results from other studies.

Methods: Our retrospective case-control study comprised two patient groups. Pregnant women with preeclampsia and pregnant women without preeclampsia were compared for BIMs: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and mean platelet volume (MPV). The primary endpoint of our research was to assess the predictive power of BIMs for preeclampsia diagnosis.

Results: The sample size was calculated based on expected differences of BIMs between the control and study groups. Comparison of quantitative variables was conducted with independent sample t-test or alternatively by Wilcoxon rank sum test. The MPV values were slightly higher in the preeclampsia group, but not statistically significant. NLR and PLR did differentiate between study and control groups.

Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of BIMs is unsatisfactory for preeclampsia diagnosis. Discrepancies concerning these values need to be clarified. Further large prospective studies are necessary to validate the potential factor accuracy in preeclampsia diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Israel Medical Association Journal
Israel Medical Association Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
54
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ), representing medical sciences and medicine in Israel, is published in English by the Israel Medical Association. The Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ) was initiated in 1999.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信