第三代与第四代经皮外翻矫正术:疗效的放射学分析。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Brian G Loder, Jason Lucas, Megan Bergeron
{"title":"第三代与第四代经皮外翻矫正术:疗效的放射学分析。","authors":"Brian G Loder, Jason Lucas, Megan Bergeron","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.08.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous hallux valgus correction is gaining popularity with foot and ankle surgeons. Various studies have found that the percutaneous approach has increased patient satisfaction and outcomes. The technique of the procedure has some variability with the geometry of the distal osteotomy being the most scrutinized. As of this publication, there has been no comparative studies on the geometry of the distal metatarsal osteotomy. This is a retrospective study of 50 patients who underwent percutaneous correction of a hallux valgus deformity with either a percutaneous transverse or modified chevron osteotomy. The two groups were compared radiographically, preoperatively, and postoperatively using both the intermetatarsal and hallux valgus angles. There is no difference in radiographic outcomes when comparing pre and post-operative IM and HAV angles, and it is the surgeon's comfort levels with a particular geometry of the osteotomy that should determine the approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Third generation versus fourth generation percutaneous hallux valgus correction: A radiographic analysis of outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Brian G Loder, Jason Lucas, Megan Bergeron\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.08.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Percutaneous hallux valgus correction is gaining popularity with foot and ankle surgeons. Various studies have found that the percutaneous approach has increased patient satisfaction and outcomes. The technique of the procedure has some variability with the geometry of the distal osteotomy being the most scrutinized. As of this publication, there has been no comparative studies on the geometry of the distal metatarsal osteotomy. This is a retrospective study of 50 patients who underwent percutaneous correction of a hallux valgus deformity with either a percutaneous transverse or modified chevron osteotomy. The two groups were compared radiographically, preoperatively, and postoperatively using both the intermetatarsal and hallux valgus angles. There is no difference in radiographic outcomes when comparing pre and post-operative IM and HAV angles, and it is the surgeon's comfort levels with a particular geometry of the osteotomy that should determine the approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2024.08.014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2024.08.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经皮外翻矫正术越来越受到足踝外科医生的青睐。多项研究发现,经皮方法提高了患者的满意度和治疗效果。该手术的技术有一定的差异性,其中远端截骨的几何形状最受关注。截至本报告发表时,还没有关于跖骨远端截骨几何形状的比较研究。这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是接受经皮横向截骨术或改良螯状截骨术矫正拇指外翻畸形的 50 名患者。两组患者术前和术后均使用跖骨间角和拇指外翻角进行了影像学比较。比较术前和术后的跖趾间角和外翻角,在放射学结果上没有差异,外科医生对截骨术特定几何形状的舒适度才是决定采用哪种方法的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Third generation versus fourth generation percutaneous hallux valgus correction: A radiographic analysis of outcomes.

Percutaneous hallux valgus correction is gaining popularity with foot and ankle surgeons. Various studies have found that the percutaneous approach has increased patient satisfaction and outcomes. The technique of the procedure has some variability with the geometry of the distal osteotomy being the most scrutinized. As of this publication, there has been no comparative studies on the geometry of the distal metatarsal osteotomy. This is a retrospective study of 50 patients who underwent percutaneous correction of a hallux valgus deformity with either a percutaneous transverse or modified chevron osteotomy. The two groups were compared radiographically, preoperatively, and postoperatively using both the intermetatarsal and hallux valgus angles. There is no difference in radiographic outcomes when comparing pre and post-operative IM and HAV angles, and it is the surgeon's comfort levels with a particular geometry of the osteotomy that should determine the approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信