学校教师声乐疲劳指数(VFI)的项目层次结构--来自南印度的研究。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Sreya Srinivas, R Poovaraghavan, Prakash Boominathan, Shenbagavalli Mahalingam
{"title":"学校教师声乐疲劳指数(VFI)的项目层次结构--来自南印度的研究。","authors":"Sreya Srinivas, R Poovaraghavan, Prakash Boominathan, Shenbagavalli Mahalingam","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aimed to identify the item hierarchy of the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) in school teachers using Mokken Scaling Analysis (MSA).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 362 school teachers from five zones in Chennai city, southern part of India, participated in the study. All subjects completed a subject-information form that had details such as age, sex, duration of vocal demand per day, number of classes taken, grades taught, and years of experience and VFI. Based on the VFI factor-I scores, teachers were segregated into three groups, viz, No Fatigue (<11), Low Fatigue (11-24), and High Fatigue (>24). Percentage analysis, Mann-Whitney U, and Pearson's chi square was done for finding the association of variables (listed above) with vocal fatigue and MSA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-hundred and seventy-five teachers (75.5%) identified themselves with vocal fatigue, and 87 (24%) others reported no vocal fatigue. The highest percentage of fatigue (63.18%) was documented in factor II, followed by factor III (48.90%) and factor I (40.38%). Mann-Whitney U test revealed a significant difference in vocal fatigue experience between males and females (P = 0.01). Pearson chi square showed a positive association between factor I and years of experience in teachers (P = 0.02). No significant correlation was observed between other variables and factors of VFI. MSA divided the VFI scale into two, scale 1 (factors I and II) and scale 2 (factor III). On segregation, several reliable scales were obtained, however, all the scales had a low Loevinger's coefficient.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>VFI, though a reliable tool, did not capture the underlying trait of vocal fatigue completely in school teachers as a population. This study ascertains the need to develop a tool that is specific to occupation/profession, geographic, sociocultural, and ethnic group. Mere adaptations and translations of tools may not necessarily suffice for clinical utility and application.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Item Hierarchy of Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) in School Teachers-A Study from South India.\",\"authors\":\"Sreya Srinivas, R Poovaraghavan, Prakash Boominathan, Shenbagavalli Mahalingam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.08.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aimed to identify the item hierarchy of the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) in school teachers using Mokken Scaling Analysis (MSA).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 362 school teachers from five zones in Chennai city, southern part of India, participated in the study. All subjects completed a subject-information form that had details such as age, sex, duration of vocal demand per day, number of classes taken, grades taught, and years of experience and VFI. Based on the VFI factor-I scores, teachers were segregated into three groups, viz, No Fatigue (<11), Low Fatigue (11-24), and High Fatigue (>24). Percentage analysis, Mann-Whitney U, and Pearson's chi square was done for finding the association of variables (listed above) with vocal fatigue and MSA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-hundred and seventy-five teachers (75.5%) identified themselves with vocal fatigue, and 87 (24%) others reported no vocal fatigue. The highest percentage of fatigue (63.18%) was documented in factor II, followed by factor III (48.90%) and factor I (40.38%). Mann-Whitney U test revealed a significant difference in vocal fatigue experience between males and females (P = 0.01). Pearson chi square showed a positive association between factor I and years of experience in teachers (P = 0.02). No significant correlation was observed between other variables and factors of VFI. MSA divided the VFI scale into two, scale 1 (factors I and II) and scale 2 (factor III). On segregation, several reliable scales were obtained, however, all the scales had a low Loevinger's coefficient.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>VFI, though a reliable tool, did not capture the underlying trait of vocal fatigue completely in school teachers as a population. This study ascertains the need to develop a tool that is specific to occupation/profession, geographic, sociocultural, and ethnic group. Mere adaptations and translations of tools may not necessarily suffice for clinical utility and application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.08.008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.08.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在利用莫肯标度分析法(MSA)确定学校教师声乐疲劳指数(VFI)的项目层次:方法:共有来自印度南部钦奈市五个区的 362 名学校教师参加了研究。所有受试者都填写了一份受试者信息表,其中包括年龄、性别、每天发声需求时间、上课次数、所教年级、工作年限和 VFI 等详细信息。根据 VFI 第一因子得分,教师被分为三组,即无疲劳组(24)。采用百分比分析、Mann-Whitney U 和 Pearson's chi square 等方法分析变量(如上所述)与发声疲劳和 MSA 的关系:275 名教师(75.5%)认为自己有发声疲劳,87 名教师(24%)表示没有发声疲劳。因素 II 中疲劳的比例最高(63.18%),其次是因素 III(48.90%)和因素 I(40.38%)。Mann-Whitney U 检验显示,男性和女性在声带疲劳经历方面存在显著差异(P = 0.01)。Pearson chi square 显示因子 I 与教师工作年限呈正相关(P = 0.02)。其他变量与 VFI 各因子之间无明显相关性。MSA 将 VFI 量表一分为二,即量表 1(因子 I 和 II)和量表 2(因子 III)。经过分离,得到了几个可靠的量表,但所有量表的洛文格系数都很低:VFI 虽然是一个可靠的工具,但并不能完全捕捉到学校教师这一群体发声疲劳的潜在特征。这项研究表明,有必要开发一种针对不同职业/专业、地域、社会文化和种族群体的工具。仅仅对工具进行改编和翻译并不一定能满足临床实用性和应用的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Item Hierarchy of Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) in School Teachers-A Study from South India.

Aim: The study aimed to identify the item hierarchy of the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) in school teachers using Mokken Scaling Analysis (MSA).

Method: A total of 362 school teachers from five zones in Chennai city, southern part of India, participated in the study. All subjects completed a subject-information form that had details such as age, sex, duration of vocal demand per day, number of classes taken, grades taught, and years of experience and VFI. Based on the VFI factor-I scores, teachers were segregated into three groups, viz, No Fatigue (<11), Low Fatigue (11-24), and High Fatigue (>24). Percentage analysis, Mann-Whitney U, and Pearson's chi square was done for finding the association of variables (listed above) with vocal fatigue and MSA.

Results: Two-hundred and seventy-five teachers (75.5%) identified themselves with vocal fatigue, and 87 (24%) others reported no vocal fatigue. The highest percentage of fatigue (63.18%) was documented in factor II, followed by factor III (48.90%) and factor I (40.38%). Mann-Whitney U test revealed a significant difference in vocal fatigue experience between males and females (P = 0.01). Pearson chi square showed a positive association between factor I and years of experience in teachers (P = 0.02). No significant correlation was observed between other variables and factors of VFI. MSA divided the VFI scale into two, scale 1 (factors I and II) and scale 2 (factor III). On segregation, several reliable scales were obtained, however, all the scales had a low Loevinger's coefficient.

Discussion/conclusion: VFI, though a reliable tool, did not capture the underlying trait of vocal fatigue completely in school teachers as a population. This study ascertains the need to develop a tool that is specific to occupation/profession, geographic, sociocultural, and ethnic group. Mere adaptations and translations of tools may not necessarily suffice for clinical utility and application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信