倒频谱声学测量:语音任务和发声偏差程度的影响

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Samylle Danúbia Leite do Ó, Mara Behlau, Samuel Ribeiro de Abreu, Marina Taborda Englert, Leonardo Wanderley Lopes
{"title":"倒频谱声学测量:语音任务和发声偏差程度的影响","authors":"Samylle Danúbia Leite do Ó, Mara Behlau, Samuel Ribeiro de Abreu, Marina Taborda Englert, Leonardo Wanderley Lopes","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.08.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze whether there are differences in the cepstral measures obtained in different speech tasks, depending on the presence and degree of vocal deviation, and to analyze if there is a correlation between the cepstral measures obtained from different speech tasks and the general degree of vocal deviation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Analysis of 258 vocal samples of the sustained vowel [a] and connected speech (counting numbers) from a database, including 160 dysphonic and 98 nondysphonic voices. The counting number samples were edited in three different durations: counting from 1 to 10, from 1 to 11, and from 1 to 20. Five speech-language pathologists (SLPs), voice specialists, carried out the perceptual-auditory judgment of the overall degree of vocal deviation (ODD) using the G from the overall dysphonia grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain (GRBAS) scale. We extracted the cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS) measurements from all the vocal samples using an extraction script in the free software Praat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CPP and CPPS were different between dysphonic and nondysphonic individuals, regardless of the speech task, with lower values for dysphonic. Also, CPP values between the vowel and the connected speech tasks were different between both groups. Only the CPPS showed differences between all the speech tasks depending on the degree of vocal deviation. There was a strong negative correlation between the CPPS<sub>Vowel</sub>, CPPS<sub>10</sub>, CPPS<sub>11</sub>, CPPS<sub>20,</sub> and the ODD, and a moderate negative correlation between CPP<sub>Vowel</sub>, CPP<sub>10</sub>, CPP<sub>11</sub>, CPP<sub>20</sub>, and ODD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are differences in the cepstral measures obtained in different speech tasks, depending on the presence of dysphonia and ODD. CPP and CPPS values are different between dysphonic and nondysphonic individuals in all speech tasks. There is a moderate negative correlation between CCP in the different speech tasks and ODD, while there is a strong negative correlation between CPPS in the different speech tasks and ODD.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cepstral Acoustic Measurements: Influence of Speech Task and Degree of Vocal Deviation.\",\"authors\":\"Samylle Danúbia Leite do Ó, Mara Behlau, Samuel Ribeiro de Abreu, Marina Taborda Englert, Leonardo Wanderley Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.08.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze whether there are differences in the cepstral measures obtained in different speech tasks, depending on the presence and degree of vocal deviation, and to analyze if there is a correlation between the cepstral measures obtained from different speech tasks and the general degree of vocal deviation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Analysis of 258 vocal samples of the sustained vowel [a] and connected speech (counting numbers) from a database, including 160 dysphonic and 98 nondysphonic voices. The counting number samples were edited in three different durations: counting from 1 to 10, from 1 to 11, and from 1 to 20. Five speech-language pathologists (SLPs), voice specialists, carried out the perceptual-auditory judgment of the overall degree of vocal deviation (ODD) using the G from the overall dysphonia grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain (GRBAS) scale. We extracted the cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS) measurements from all the vocal samples using an extraction script in the free software Praat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CPP and CPPS were different between dysphonic and nondysphonic individuals, regardless of the speech task, with lower values for dysphonic. Also, CPP values between the vowel and the connected speech tasks were different between both groups. Only the CPPS showed differences between all the speech tasks depending on the degree of vocal deviation. There was a strong negative correlation between the CPPS<sub>Vowel</sub>, CPPS<sub>10</sub>, CPPS<sub>11</sub>, CPPS<sub>20,</sub> and the ODD, and a moderate negative correlation between CPP<sub>Vowel</sub>, CPP<sub>10</sub>, CPP<sub>11</sub>, CPP<sub>20</sub>, and ODD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are differences in the cepstral measures obtained in different speech tasks, depending on the presence of dysphonia and ODD. CPP and CPPS values are different between dysphonic and nondysphonic individuals in all speech tasks. There is a moderate negative correlation between CCP in the different speech tasks and ODD, while there is a strong negative correlation between CPPS in the different speech tasks and ODD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.08.027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.08.027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析在不同的语音任务中获得的epstral测量值是否存在差异,这取决于发声偏差的存在和程度,并分析在不同的语音任务中获得的epstral测量值与一般发声偏差程度之间是否存在相关性:方法:分析数据库中 258 个持续元音[a]和连接语音(计数数字)的发声样本,其中包括 160 个发音困难和 98 个非发音困难的声音。数数样本按三种不同的持续时间进行编辑:从 1 数到 10,从 1 数到 11,从 1 数到 20。五名语言病理学家(SLPs),即嗓音专家,使用总体发音障碍等级、粗糙度、呼吸感、气喘和劳损(GRBAS)量表中的 G 值对总体发声偏差(ODD)程度进行感知-听觉判断。我们使用免费软件 Praat 中的提取脚本从所有声带样本中提取了共振峰突度(CPP)和平滑共振峰突度(CPPS)测量值:无论语音任务如何,发音障碍者和非发音障碍者的 CPP 和 CPPS 都不同,发音障碍者的 CPP 和 CPPS 值较低。此外,元音任务和连贯言语任务之间的 CPP 值在两组之间也存在差异。只有 CPPS 因发声偏差程度不同而在所有语音任务之间存在差异。CPPSVowel、CPPS10、CPPS11、CPPS20 和 ODD 之间存在较强的负相关,CPPVowel、CPP10、CPP11、CPP20 和 ODD 之间存在中等程度的负相关:结论:在不同的言语任务中获得的epstral测量值存在差异,这取决于是否存在发音障碍和ODD。在所有言语任务中,发音障碍者和非发音障碍者的 CPP 和 CPPS 值都不同。不同言语任务中的 CCP 与 ODD 之间存在中度负相关,而不同言语任务中的 CPPS 与 ODD 之间存在较强的负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cepstral Acoustic Measurements: Influence of Speech Task and Degree of Vocal Deviation.

Objective: To analyze whether there are differences in the cepstral measures obtained in different speech tasks, depending on the presence and degree of vocal deviation, and to analyze if there is a correlation between the cepstral measures obtained from different speech tasks and the general degree of vocal deviation.

Method: Analysis of 258 vocal samples of the sustained vowel [a] and connected speech (counting numbers) from a database, including 160 dysphonic and 98 nondysphonic voices. The counting number samples were edited in three different durations: counting from 1 to 10, from 1 to 11, and from 1 to 20. Five speech-language pathologists (SLPs), voice specialists, carried out the perceptual-auditory judgment of the overall degree of vocal deviation (ODD) using the G from the overall dysphonia grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain (GRBAS) scale. We extracted the cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS) measurements from all the vocal samples using an extraction script in the free software Praat.

Results: CPP and CPPS were different between dysphonic and nondysphonic individuals, regardless of the speech task, with lower values for dysphonic. Also, CPP values between the vowel and the connected speech tasks were different between both groups. Only the CPPS showed differences between all the speech tasks depending on the degree of vocal deviation. There was a strong negative correlation between the CPPSVowel, CPPS10, CPPS11, CPPS20, and the ODD, and a moderate negative correlation between CPPVowel, CPP10, CPP11, CPP20, and ODD.

Conclusions: There are differences in the cepstral measures obtained in different speech tasks, depending on the presence of dysphonia and ODD. CPP and CPPS values are different between dysphonic and nondysphonic individuals in all speech tasks. There is a moderate negative correlation between CCP in the different speech tasks and ODD, while there is a strong negative correlation between CPPS in the different speech tasks and ODD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信