基于电子德尔菲方法,制定以药房为基础的最佳实践,以支持更安全地使用和管理处方阿片类药物。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Suzanne Nielsen, Freya Horn, Rebecca McDonald, Desiree Eide, Alexander Y Walley, Ingrid Binswanger, Aili V Langford, Pallavi Prathivadi, Pene Wood, Thomas Clausen, Louisa Picco
{"title":"基于电子德尔菲方法,制定以药房为基础的最佳实践,以支持更安全地使用和管理处方阿片类药物。","authors":"Suzanne Nielsen, Freya Horn, Rebecca McDonald, Desiree Eide, Alexander Y Walley, Ingrid Binswanger, Aili V Langford, Pallavi Prathivadi, Pene Wood, Thomas Clausen, Louisa Picco","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid utilization and related harm have increased in recent decades, notably in Australia, the United States, Canada, and some European countries. For people who are prescribed opioids, pharmacies offer an accessible, regular point-of-contact, providing a unique opportunity to address opioid prescription drugs risks.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This project aimed to develop consensus-based, best practice statements for improving the safer use of prescription opioids through community pharmacy settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The e-Delphi technique is used to obtain consensus from experts about issues where conclusive evidence is lacking, using multiple rounds of online participation. The investigator group identified an international group of potential participants with relevant expertise who were invited to the study, and asked to identify other experts for invitation. The e-Delphi process comprised three online rounds, involving (1) statement idea generation, (2) developing statement consensus, and (3) confirming and ranking statements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A diverse group of 42 experts (76 % female, 6 countries) participated, comprising pharmacists (n = 24, 57 %), medical doctors of differing specialties (n = 12, 29 %), and/or researchers (n = 28, 67 %), with a mean of 15 years' professional experience (SD = 8.08). Eighty-five statements were initially developed in Round 1, and 78 were supported with amendments, with suggestions to merge and remove items in Round 2, resulting in 72 final statements which were all endorsed in Round 3. Items spanned seven themes: education, monitoring outcomes and risk, deprescribing and pain management, overdose education and naloxone, opioid agonist treatment, staff education, and overarching practices. Preferred terminology was determined in Round 2 and confirmed in Round 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Community pharmacies offer a unique opportunity to support the safer use of prescription opioids. These 72 best practice statements provide practical guidance on specific practices that pharmacists can undertake to support patients' safer use of prescription opioids and prevent or reduce harms from prescribed opioid use.</p>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of pharmacy-based best practices to support safer use and management of prescription opioids based on an e-Delphi methodology.\",\"authors\":\"Suzanne Nielsen, Freya Horn, Rebecca McDonald, Desiree Eide, Alexander Y Walley, Ingrid Binswanger, Aili V Langford, Pallavi Prathivadi, Pene Wood, Thomas Clausen, Louisa Picco\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid utilization and related harm have increased in recent decades, notably in Australia, the United States, Canada, and some European countries. For people who are prescribed opioids, pharmacies offer an accessible, regular point-of-contact, providing a unique opportunity to address opioid prescription drugs risks.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This project aimed to develop consensus-based, best practice statements for improving the safer use of prescription opioids through community pharmacy settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The e-Delphi technique is used to obtain consensus from experts about issues where conclusive evidence is lacking, using multiple rounds of online participation. The investigator group identified an international group of potential participants with relevant expertise who were invited to the study, and asked to identify other experts for invitation. The e-Delphi process comprised three online rounds, involving (1) statement idea generation, (2) developing statement consensus, and (3) confirming and ranking statements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A diverse group of 42 experts (76 % female, 6 countries) participated, comprising pharmacists (n = 24, 57 %), medical doctors of differing specialties (n = 12, 29 %), and/or researchers (n = 28, 67 %), with a mean of 15 years' professional experience (SD = 8.08). Eighty-five statements were initially developed in Round 1, and 78 were supported with amendments, with suggestions to merge and remove items in Round 2, resulting in 72 final statements which were all endorsed in Round 3. Items spanned seven themes: education, monitoring outcomes and risk, deprescribing and pain management, overdose education and naloxone, opioid agonist treatment, staff education, and overarching practices. Preferred terminology was determined in Round 2 and confirmed in Round 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Community pharmacies offer a unique opportunity to support the safer use of prescription opioids. These 72 best practice statements provide practical guidance on specific practices that pharmacists can undertake to support patients' safer use of prescription opioids and prevent or reduce harms from prescribed opioid use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.09.001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.09.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近几十年来,阿片类药物的使用和相关危害不断增加,尤其是在澳大利亚、美国、加拿大和一些欧洲国家。对于被处方阿片类药物的人来说,药房是一个方便、固定的接触点,为解决阿片类处方药的风险问题提供了一个独特的机会:本项目旨在制定以共识为基础的最佳实践声明,通过社区药房提高阿片类处方药的安全使用:方法:采用电子德尔菲(e-Delphi)技术,通过多轮在线参与,就缺乏确凿证据的问题从专家那里获得共识。研究小组确定了一批具有相关专业知识的国际潜在参与者,邀请他们参与研究,并要求他们确定其他专家以供邀请。e-Delphi 流程包括三轮在线讨论,涉及 (1) 陈述想法的产生,(2) 陈述共识的形成,以及 (3) 陈述的确认和排序:42 名专家(76% 为女性,来自 6 个国家)参加了此次活动,其中包括药剂师(24 人,占 57%)、不同专业的医生(12 人,占 29%)和/或研究人员(28 人,占 67%),平均专业经验为 15 年(SD = 8.08)。第 1 轮初步拟定了 85 项陈述,第 2 轮对 78 项陈述进行了修正,并提出了合并和删除项目的建议,最终形成了 72 项陈述,这些陈述在第 3 轮得到了全部认可。项目涉及七个主题:教育、监测结果和风险、去处方化和疼痛管理、用药过量教育和纳洛酮、阿片激动剂治疗、员工教育和总体实践。首选术语在第二轮中确定,并在第三轮中得到确认:社区药房为支持更安全地使用处方类阿片提供了独特的机会。这 72 项最佳实践声明就药剂师可以采取的具体做法提供了实用指导,以支持患者更安全地使用处方阿片类药物,并预防或减少处方阿片类药物使用造成的伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of pharmacy-based best practices to support safer use and management of prescription opioids based on an e-Delphi methodology.

Background: Opioid utilization and related harm have increased in recent decades, notably in Australia, the United States, Canada, and some European countries. For people who are prescribed opioids, pharmacies offer an accessible, regular point-of-contact, providing a unique opportunity to address opioid prescription drugs risks.

Objective: This project aimed to develop consensus-based, best practice statements for improving the safer use of prescription opioids through community pharmacy settings.

Methods: The e-Delphi technique is used to obtain consensus from experts about issues where conclusive evidence is lacking, using multiple rounds of online participation. The investigator group identified an international group of potential participants with relevant expertise who were invited to the study, and asked to identify other experts for invitation. The e-Delphi process comprised three online rounds, involving (1) statement idea generation, (2) developing statement consensus, and (3) confirming and ranking statements.

Results: A diverse group of 42 experts (76 % female, 6 countries) participated, comprising pharmacists (n = 24, 57 %), medical doctors of differing specialties (n = 12, 29 %), and/or researchers (n = 28, 67 %), with a mean of 15 years' professional experience (SD = 8.08). Eighty-five statements were initially developed in Round 1, and 78 were supported with amendments, with suggestions to merge and remove items in Round 2, resulting in 72 final statements which were all endorsed in Round 3. Items spanned seven themes: education, monitoring outcomes and risk, deprescribing and pain management, overdose education and naloxone, opioid agonist treatment, staff education, and overarching practices. Preferred terminology was determined in Round 2 and confirmed in Round 3.

Conclusions: Community pharmacies offer a unique opportunity to support the safer use of prescription opioids. These 72 best practice statements provide practical guidance on specific practices that pharmacists can undertake to support patients' safer use of prescription opioids and prevent or reduce harms from prescribed opioid use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信