基于自然的围产期抑郁、焦虑和孤独干预措施的系统性回顾。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Maternal and Child Health Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1007/s10995-024-03989-1
Chelsea Walker-Mao, Ashby Lavelle Sachs, Jessica Walls Wilson, Jordan Wrigley, Jill S Litt, Charlotte V Farewell, Bridget Lattimer, Jenn A Leiferman
{"title":"基于自然的围产期抑郁、焦虑和孤独干预措施的系统性回顾。","authors":"Chelsea Walker-Mao, Ashby Lavelle Sachs, Jessica Walls Wilson, Jordan Wrigley, Jill S Litt, Charlotte V Farewell, Bridget Lattimer, Jenn A Leiferman","doi":"10.1007/s10995-024-03989-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perinatal mood and anxiety disorders and social isolation are prevalent and associated with adverse maternal and child health outcomes. We conducted a systematic review to assess the evidence for nature-based interventions (NBIs) to address depression, anxiety, and loneliness among pregnant and postpartum women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were identified through MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.org, Web of Science, and Cochrane Reviews in February 2023. Included studies were original, peer-reviewed studies published in or translated into English that evaluated an intervention which engaged pregnant or postpartum women directly with nature and used a quantitative outcome measure for anxiety, depression, or loneliness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three studies, including 68 pregnant or postpartum women and their family or friends, met our inclusion criteria. Results were synthesized narratively in text and tables. All studies had early-stage designs and relatively small sample sizes. A variety of intervention content and delivery platforms were utilized. Studies were not adequately powered to test or detect statistically significant changes in depression, anxiety, or loneliness. Measurement of nature engagement varied. Using the Downs and Black checklist, we found study quality varied from good to poor.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>More research is needed to understand the potential benefits of NBIs for perinatal mental health and social wellbeing. Additional study rigor is needed, including the consistent use of validated and well-rationalized measures of nature engagement. Intervention design should consider the varying needs perinatal populations, including barriers to and facilitators of engagement for diverse communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48367,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1886-1896"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review of Nature-Based Interventions for Perinatal Depression, Anxiety, and Loneliness.\",\"authors\":\"Chelsea Walker-Mao, Ashby Lavelle Sachs, Jessica Walls Wilson, Jordan Wrigley, Jill S Litt, Charlotte V Farewell, Bridget Lattimer, Jenn A Leiferman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10995-024-03989-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perinatal mood and anxiety disorders and social isolation are prevalent and associated with adverse maternal and child health outcomes. We conducted a systematic review to assess the evidence for nature-based interventions (NBIs) to address depression, anxiety, and loneliness among pregnant and postpartum women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were identified through MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.org, Web of Science, and Cochrane Reviews in February 2023. Included studies were original, peer-reviewed studies published in or translated into English that evaluated an intervention which engaged pregnant or postpartum women directly with nature and used a quantitative outcome measure for anxiety, depression, or loneliness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three studies, including 68 pregnant or postpartum women and their family or friends, met our inclusion criteria. Results were synthesized narratively in text and tables. All studies had early-stage designs and relatively small sample sizes. A variety of intervention content and delivery platforms were utilized. Studies were not adequately powered to test or detect statistically significant changes in depression, anxiety, or loneliness. Measurement of nature engagement varied. Using the Downs and Black checklist, we found study quality varied from good to poor.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>More research is needed to understand the potential benefits of NBIs for perinatal mental health and social wellbeing. Additional study rigor is needed, including the consistent use of validated and well-rationalized measures of nature engagement. Intervention design should consider the varying needs perinatal populations, including barriers to and facilitators of engagement for diverse communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal and Child Health Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1886-1896\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal and Child Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-024-03989-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-024-03989-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:围产期情绪和焦虑障碍以及社会隔离是普遍现象,与不良的母婴健康结果相关。我们进行了一项系统性综述,评估以自然为基础的干预措施(NBIs)解决孕妇和产后妇女抑郁、焦虑和孤独问题的证据:我们于 2023 年 2 月通过 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、APA PsycINFO、ClinicalTrials.org、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Reviews 确定了相关研究。纳入的研究均为以英语发表或翻译成英语的原创性同行评审研究,这些研究评估了孕妇或产后妇女直接与大自然接触的干预措施,并对焦虑、抑郁或孤独感进行了定量结果测量:有三项研究符合我们的纳入标准,其中包括 68 名孕妇或产后妇女及其家人或朋友。研究结果以文字和表格的形式进行了综合叙述。所有研究均为早期设计,样本量相对较小。采用了多种干预内容和实施平台。这些研究没有足够的动力来测试或检测抑郁、焦虑或孤独感在统计学上的显著变化。对自然参与度的测量各不相同。使用唐斯和布莱克检查表,我们发现研究质量从好到差不等:讨论:需要进行更多的研究,以了解 NBI 对围产期心理健康和社会福利的潜在益处。研究需要更加严格,包括持续使用经过验证且合理的自然参与测量方法。干预设计应考虑围产期人群的不同需求,包括不同社区参与的障碍和促进因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic Review of Nature-Based Interventions for Perinatal Depression, Anxiety, and Loneliness.

Background: Perinatal mood and anxiety disorders and social isolation are prevalent and associated with adverse maternal and child health outcomes. We conducted a systematic review to assess the evidence for nature-based interventions (NBIs) to address depression, anxiety, and loneliness among pregnant and postpartum women.

Methods: Studies were identified through MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.org, Web of Science, and Cochrane Reviews in February 2023. Included studies were original, peer-reviewed studies published in or translated into English that evaluated an intervention which engaged pregnant or postpartum women directly with nature and used a quantitative outcome measure for anxiety, depression, or loneliness.

Results: Three studies, including 68 pregnant or postpartum women and their family or friends, met our inclusion criteria. Results were synthesized narratively in text and tables. All studies had early-stage designs and relatively small sample sizes. A variety of intervention content and delivery platforms were utilized. Studies were not adequately powered to test or detect statistically significant changes in depression, anxiety, or loneliness. Measurement of nature engagement varied. Using the Downs and Black checklist, we found study quality varied from good to poor.

Discussion: More research is needed to understand the potential benefits of NBIs for perinatal mental health and social wellbeing. Additional study rigor is needed, including the consistent use of validated and well-rationalized measures of nature engagement. Intervention design should consider the varying needs perinatal populations, including barriers to and facilitators of engagement for diverse communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Maternal and Child Health Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
271
期刊介绍: Maternal and Child Health Journal is the first exclusive forum to advance the scientific and professional knowledge base of the maternal and child health (MCH) field. This bimonthly provides peer-reviewed papers addressing the following areas of MCH practice, policy, and research: MCH epidemiology, demography, and health status assessment Innovative MCH service initiatives Implementation of MCH programs MCH policy analysis and advocacy MCH professional development. Exploring the full spectrum of the MCH field, Maternal and Child Health Journal is an important tool for practitioners as well as academics in public health, obstetrics, gynecology, prenatal medicine, pediatrics, and neonatology. Sponsors include the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), and CityMatCH.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信